Gale R, Slater P E, Zalkinder-Luboshitz I
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1986 Dec;23(5-6):369-77. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(86)90172-3.
In 147 elective and 384 non-elective cesarean sections, the need for neonatal respiratory assistance at birth was significantly greater for babies born under general anesthesia compared to epidural anesthesia, and the differences could not be explained by differences in pre-operative risk factors. For 114 babies on whom blood gas data were gathered prospectively, a greater proportion born under general anesthesia were acidemic and hypercarbic. Our results complement a growing body of retrospective and clinical data suggesting that epidural anesthesia is preferable to general in all but a few cesarean sections. Ideally, this suggestion should be tested in a randomized clinical trial.
在147例择期剖宫产和384例非择期剖宫产中,与硬膜外麻醉相比,全身麻醉下出生的婴儿出生时对新生儿呼吸辅助的需求显著更高,且这些差异无法用术前危险因素的差异来解释。对于前瞻性收集血气数据的114例婴儿,全身麻醉下出生的婴儿中酸血症和高碳酸血症的比例更高。我们的结果补充了越来越多的回顾性和临床数据,表明除少数剖宫产外,硬膜外麻醉优于全身麻醉。理想情况下,这一建议应在随机临床试验中进行检验。