Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, España; CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Grupo de Trabajo de Analgesia, Sedación, Contenciones y Delirio de la Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (GT-ASCyD-SEEIUC), España.
Grupo de Trabajo de Analgesia, Sedación, Contenciones y Delirio de la Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (GT-ASCyD-SEEIUC), España; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (Imas12), Madrid, España; Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, España.
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan-Mar;31(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
Main aim: To determine the Spanish intensive care units (ICU) that assess and record pain levels, sedation/agitation, delirium and the use of physical restraint (PR) as standard practice. Secondary aims: To determine the use of validated assessment tools and to explore patients' levels of pain and sedation/agitation, the prevalence of delirium, and the use of PR.
An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective and multicentre study using an ad hoc survey with online access that consisted of 2 blocks. Block I: with questions on the unit's characteristics and routine practice; Block II: aspects of direct care and direct assessments of patients admitted to participating units.
One hundred and fifty-eight units and 1574 patients participated. The pain of communicative patients (CP) was assessed and recorded as standard in 109 units (69%), the pain of non-communicative patients (NCP) in 84 (53%), sedation/agitation in 111 (70%), and delirium in 39 units (25%). There was recorded use of PR in 39 units (25%). Validated scales were used to assess the pain of CP in 139 units (88%), of NCP in 102 (65%), sedation/agitation in 145 (92%), delirium in 53 units (34%). In 33 units (21%) pain, sedation/agitation and delirium of PC and NPC was assessed, and in 8 of these units there was a specific PR protocol and register. Among the patients who could be assessed, an absence of pain was reported in 57%, moderate pain in 27%; 48% were calm and collaborative, and 10% agitated; 21% had PR, and 12.6% of the patients had delirium.
The assessment of pain, sedation and delirium is demonstrated, and low percentages of agitation and delirium achieved. We observed a high percentage of patients with pain, and moderate use of PC. We should generalise the use of protocols to assess, prevent and treat pain and delirium by appropriately managing analgesia, sedation, and individual and well-considered use of PC. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03773874).
主要目的:确定评估和记录疼痛水平、镇静/躁动、谵妄和使用身体约束(PR)的西班牙重症监护病房(ICU)作为标准做法。次要目的:确定使用经过验证的评估工具,并探讨患者的疼痛和镇静/躁动水平、谵妄的发生率以及 PR 的使用情况。
采用观察性、描述性、横断面、前瞻性和多中心研究,使用在线访问的特定调查,包括 2 个部分。第 1 部分:关于单位特征和常规实践的问题;第 2 部分:直接护理和直接评估入住参与单位患者的方面。
共有 158 个单位和 1574 名患者参与。109 个单位(69%)标准评估和记录有沟通能力的患者(CP)的疼痛,84 个单位(53%)评估和记录无沟通能力的患者(NCP)的疼痛,111 个单位(70%)评估和记录镇静/躁动,39 个单位(25%)评估和记录谵妄。39 个单位(25%)记录使用 PR。139 个单位(88%)评估 CP 的疼痛、102 个单位(65%)评估 NCP 的疼痛、145 个单位(92%)评估镇静/躁动、53 个单位(34%)评估谵妄时使用了经过验证的量表。在 33 个单位(21%)中,对 PC 和 NPC 的疼痛、镇静/躁动和谵妄进行了评估,其中 8 个单位有专门的 PR 协议和登记册。在可以评估的患者中,57%报告无疼痛,27%报告中度疼痛;48%安静协作,10%躁动;21%有 PR,12.6%的患者有谵妄。
评估疼痛、镇静和谵妄的情况得到了证明,而躁动和谵妄的百分比较低。我们观察到有相当比例的患者有疼痛,并且中度使用 PC。我们应该推广使用协议来评估、预防和治疗疼痛和谵妄,通过适当管理镇痛、镇静以及个体化和深思熟虑地使用 PC。(临床试验标识符:NCT03773874)。