3M Drug Delivery Systems, Inhalation Drug Delivery, 3M Center, Building 260-3A-05, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55144-1000, USA.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019 Apr 19;20(5):170. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019-1354-7.
Cascade impactor testing is widely used to characterize the aerodynamic particle-size distribution of metered dose inhaler aerosols. Charge is often imparted to MDI aerosols by triboelectrification as formulation rapidly travels through the valve stem and actuator during atomization. The presence of charge on MDI aerosols can impact the accuracy and reproducibility of APSD measurements made using cascade impactors. The aerodynamic particle size distribution of three different experimental MDI formulations were evaluated using the Next Generation Impactor with and without incorporating static controls during testing. The static controls included grounding the analyst and the equipment, using an ionizing air blower and anti-static gun, rinsing and allowing the actuator to air dry prior to testing, and having the analyst not wear gloves or touch the USP throat during testing. For all three formulations, tests that used static controls had lower actuator and throat deposition and correspondingly higher deposition on the impactor stages. While static controls influenced the amount of drug entering into the impactor during testing, the static controls did not otherwise change the aerodynamic particle size distribution of these particles. Static controls had the greatest impact on the ethanol-free HFA-227 formulation. For this formulation, there was a 15% difference in throat deposition for the tests that did or did not incorporate static controls. These results demonstrated that electrostatic effects can lead to meaningful variability in cascade impactor test results. Static controls should be considered when developing cascade impactor test methods for MDI products in order to eliminate variability in test results.
级联冲击器测试广泛用于描述计量吸入器气溶胶的空气动力学粒径分布。在雾化过程中,配方制剂快速流经阀门杆和致动器时,常常通过静电摩擦给 MDI 气溶胶充电。MDI 气溶胶上的电荷会影响使用级联冲击器进行的 APSD 测量的准确性和重现性。使用下一代冲击器评估了三种不同的实验性 MDI 配方,在测试过程中是否结合了静电控制。静电控制包括使分析人员和设备接地、使用电离空气鼓风机和静电枪、在测试前冲洗并让致动器风干、以及在测试过程中分析人员不戴手套或触摸 USP 咽喉。对于所有三种配方,使用静电控制的测试具有较低的致动器和咽喉沉积,相应地在冲击器阶段具有较高的沉积。虽然静电控制会影响在测试过程中进入冲击器的药物量,但它们不会改变这些颗粒的空气动力学粒径分布。静电控制对无乙醇 HFA-227 配方的影响最大。对于该配方,在纳入或不纳入静电控制的测试中,咽喉沉积有 15%的差异。这些结果表明,静电效应会导致级联冲击器测试结果产生有意义的可变性。在为 MDI 产品开发级联冲击器测试方法时,应考虑静电控制,以消除测试结果的可变性。