Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2020 Apr;22(2):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s10903-019-00890-w.
Comparison of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators in Latinx majority populations living with HIV can assist clinicians in selecting a calculator and interpreting results. 10-year CVD risks were estimated for 652 patients seen ≥ 2 times over 12 months in a public clinic using three risk calculators: Atherosclerotic CVD risk Calculator (ASCVD), Framingham Risk Calculator (FRC), and Data Collection on Adverse Effects of Anti-HIV Drugs Study (D:A:D) Calculator. Median estimated 10-year CVD risk in this population was highest using FRC (11%), followed by D:A:D (10%), and lowest with ASCVD (5%; p < 0.001). However, D:A:D classified 44.3% in a high/very high risk category compared to FRC (20.7%) and ASCVD (33.4%) (all p < 0.001). ASCVD risk estimates differed significantly by race/ethnicity (p < 0.001). Risk varied widely across three risk calculators and by race/ethnicity, and providers should be aware of these differences when choosing a calculator for use in majority minority populations.
比较心血管疾病 (CVD) 风险计算器在拉丁裔为主的 HIV 感染者中的应用,可以帮助临床医生选择计算器并解释结果。使用三种风险计算器(动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 风险计算器 (ASCVD)、弗雷明汉风险计算器 (FRC) 和抗 HIV 药物不良影响数据收集研究 (D:A:D) 计算器)对在一家公立诊所就诊≥2 次、随访 12 个月的 652 名患者进行了 10 年 CVD 风险估计。该人群中使用 FRC 估计的 10 年 CVD 风险中位数最高(11%),其次是 D:A:D(10%),ASCVD 最低(5%;p<0.001)。然而,D:A:D 将 44.3%的患者归类为高/极高风险类别,而 FRC 为 20.7%,ASCVD 为 33.4%(均 p<0.001)。ASCVD 风险估计因种族/民族而异(p<0.001)。三种风险计算器和种族/民族之间的风险差异很大,临床医生在为少数族裔为主的人群选择计算器时应注意这些差异。