Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Section of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jun;228(6):910-923. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
Within the growing geriatric population, there is an increasing need for emergency operations. Optimizing outcomes can require a structured system of surgical care based on key quality indicators. To investigate this, the current study sought to answer 2 questions. First, to what degree does hospital emergency operative volume impact mortality for geriatric patients undergoing emergency general surgery (EGS) operations? Second, at what procedure-specific hospital volume will geriatric patients undergoing an emergency operation achieve at or better than average mortality risk?
Retrospective cohort study of geriatric patients (aged 65 years and older) who underwent 1 of 10 EGS operations identified from the California State Inpatient Database (2010 to 2011). β-Logistic generalized linear regression was used, with the hospital as the unit of analysis, to investigate the relationship between hospital operative volume and in-hospital riskv-adjusted mortality. Hospital operative volume thresholds to optimize probability of survival were defined.
There were 41,860 operations evaluated at 299 hospitals. For each operation, mortality decreased as hospital emergency operative volume increased (p < 0.001 for each operation); for every standardized increase in volume (meaning +1 natural logarithm of volume), the reduction in mortality ranged from 14% for colectomy to 61% for appendectomy. Hospital volume thresholds, which optimize to 95% probability of survival, varied by procedure, with a mean of 14 operations over 2 years. More than 50% of hospitals did not meet the threshold benchmarks, representing 22% of patients.
Survival rates for geriatric patients were improved substantially when emergency operations were performed at hospitals with higher operative volumes. Consistent with all active Quality Programs of the American College of Surgeons, hospital operative volume appears to be an important metric of surgical quality for older patients undergoing emergency operations.
在不断增长的老年人口中,对急诊手术的需求日益增加。为了优化手术效果,可以建立一个基于关键质量指标的外科手术护理结构化体系。为了调查这一点,本研究旨在回答两个问题。第一,医院急诊手术量对接受急诊普通外科手术(EGS)的老年患者的死亡率有多大影响?第二,在哪个特定手术量下,接受急诊手术的老年患者的死亡率将达到或低于平均风险?
回顾性队列研究,研究对象为从加利福尼亚州住院患者数据库(2010 年至 2011 年)中确定的 10 种 EGS 手术之一的老年患者(年龄≥65 岁)。使用β-Logistic 广义线性回归,以医院为单位进行分析,调查医院手术量与院内风险调整死亡率之间的关系。定义了优化生存率概率的医院手术量阈值。
在 299 家医院共评估了 41860 例手术。对于每种手术,随着医院急诊手术量的增加,死亡率降低(每种手术均<0.001);每增加一个标准化手术量(即增加 1 个自然对数的手术量),死亡率降低范围从结肠切除术的 14%到阑尾切除术的 61%。手术优化至 95%生存率的医院容量阈值因手术类型而异,平均每年为 14 例。超过 50%的医院未达到基准阈值,占患者的 22%。
当在手术量较高的医院进行急诊手术时,老年患者的生存率显著提高。与美国外科医师学院所有现行质量计划一致,医院手术量似乎是接受急诊手术的老年患者手术质量的一个重要指标。