• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较护理价值:常见手术的医院成本差异及其与手术量的关系。

Benchmarking the value of care: Variability in hospital costs for common operations and its association with procedure volume.

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery (C.K.Z., K.A.D.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery (C.K.Z., S.A.H.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (A.C.B.), College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Surgery (J.P.M.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and Department of Surgery (K.L.S.), Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 May;88(5):619-628. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002611.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002611
PMID:32039972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7802807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts to improve health care value (quality/cost) have become a priority in the United States. Although many seek to increase quality by reducing variability in adverse outcomes, less is known about variability in costs. In conjunction with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Healthcare Economics Committee, the objective of this study was to examine the extent of variability in total hospital costs for two common procedures: laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

Nationally weighted data for adults 18 years and older was obtained for patients undergoing each operation in the 2014 and 2016 National Inpatient Sample. Data were aggregated at the hospital-level to attain hospital-specific median index hospital costs in 2019 US dollars and corresponding annual procedure volumes. Cost variation was assessed using caterpillar plots and risk-standardized observed/expected cost ratios. Correlation analysis, variance decomposition, and regression analysis explored costs' association with volume.

RESULTS

In 2016, 1,563 hospitals representing 86,170 LA and 2,276 hospitals representing 230,120 LC met the inclusion criteria. In 2014, the numbers were similar (1,602 and 2,259 hospitals). Compared with a mean of US $10,202, LA median costs ranged from US $2,850 to US $33,381. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy median costs ranged from US $4,406 to US $40,585 with a mean of US $12,567. Differences in cost strongly associated with procedure volume. Volume accounted for 9.9% (LA) and 12.4% (LC) of variation between hospitals, after controlling for the influence of other hospital (8.2% and 5.0%) and patient (6.3% and 3.7%) characteristics and in-hospital complications (0.8% and 0.4%). Counterfactual modeling suggests that were all hospitals to have performed at or below their expected median cost, one would see a national cost savings of greater than US $301.9 million per year (95% confidence interval, US $280.6-325.5 million).

CONCLUSION

Marked variability of median hospital costs for common operations exists. Differences remained consistent across changing coding structures and database years and were strongly associated with volume. Taken together, the findings suggest room for improvement in emergency general surgery and a need to address large discrepancies in an often-overlooked aspect of value.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiological, level III.

摘要

背景

提高医疗保健价值(质量/成本)在美国已成为当务之急。尽管许多人试图通过减少不良结果的变异性来提高质量,但对于成本的变异性知之甚少。本研究与美国创伤外科学会医疗保健经济委员会合作,旨在检查两种常见手术:腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的总住院费用的变异性程度。

方法

从 2014 年和 2016 年国家住院患者样本中获得 18 岁及以上成人接受每种手术的数据。将数据汇总到医院层面,以获得 2019 年以美元计价的医院特定中位数指数住院费用和相应的年度手术量。使用毛毛虫图和风险标准化观察/预期成本比评估成本变化。相关性分析、方差分解和回归分析探讨了成本与数量的关系。

结果

2016 年,有 1563 家医院代表 86170 例 LA 和 2276 家医院代表 230120 例 LC 符合纳入标准。2014 年,数字相似(1602 家和 2259 家医院)。与平均 10202 美元相比,LA 的中位数费用范围为 2850 美元至 33381 美元。LC 的中位数费用范围为 4406 美元至 40585 美元,平均为 12567 美元。成本差异与手术量密切相关。在控制其他医院(8.2%和 5.0%)和患者(6.3%和 3.7%)特征和住院并发症(0.8%和 0.4%)的影响后,医院之间的差异占 9.9%(LA)和 12.4%(LC),占 9.9%(LA)和 12.4%(LC)。假设所有医院的执行费用都低于或等于其预期中位数成本,那么每年全国的节省费用将超过 3.019 亿美元(95%置信区间为 2.806 亿美元至 3.255 亿美元)。

结论

常见手术的中位数医院费用存在显著差异。差异在不断变化的编码结构和数据库年份中保持一致,并且与数量密切相关。总的来说,这些发现表明,急诊普通外科仍有改进的空间,需要解决价值中一个经常被忽视的方面的巨大差异。

证据水平

流行病学,三级。

相似文献

1
Benchmarking the value of care: Variability in hospital costs for common operations and its association with procedure volume.比较护理价值:常见手术的医院成本差异及其与手术量的关系。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 May;88(5):619-628. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002611.
2
Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的区域成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2339-2344. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6526-0. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
The effects of laparoscopic surgery and nosocomial infections on the cost of care: evidence from three common surgical procedures.腹腔镜手术和医院感染对护理成本的影响:来自三种常见外科手术的证据。
Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00422.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
4
Cost and outcomes of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Mongolia.蒙古国开腹与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本及结果
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.常见腹腔镜手术的安全性、疗效和成本效益。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1127-35. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
6
Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement.急危重症普通外科手术后 30 天结局比较:具有针对性改进的潜力。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):217-38. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.009.
7
[Cost-benefit calculations in laparoscopic surgery. Substantial total benefits, but extra expenses for hospitals are required--reversed effect].[腹腔镜手术中的成本效益计算。总效益显著,但医院需要额外费用——效果相反]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 20;113(16):2007-9.
8
Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in children.腹腔镜检查在儿童中的成本效益
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Sep;153(9):965-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.9.965.
9
Assessing outcomes and costs of appendectomies performed at rural hospitals.评估在农村医院进行的阑尾切除术的结果和成本。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1102-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.038. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
10
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interhospital variation in the non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults.成人单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗的医院间差异。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 May 29;20:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.008. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Using Case Mix Index within Diagnosis-Related Groups to Evaluate Variation in Hospitalization Costs at a Large Academic Medical Center.使用病例组合指数在疾病相关分组内评估大型学术医疗中心住院费用的变化。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:1201-1208. eCollection 2023.
3
Variability in hospital costs for short stay emergent laparoscopic appendectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for General Surgery Operations Performed Emergently in Adults.成人急诊普通外科手术的医院手术量与手术死亡率
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):288-303. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003232.
2
Pro-con debate on regionalization of emergency general surgery: controversy or common sense?急诊普通外科区域化的利弊辩论:是争议还是常识?
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 May 19;4(1):e000319. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000319. eCollection 2019.
3
Macroeconomic trends and practice models impacting acute care surgery.
短期急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术的住院费用差异
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Nov 7;10:223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.10.007. eCollection 2022 Oct.
影响急性护理手术的宏观经济趋势与实践模式。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Apr 11;4(1):e000295. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000295. eCollection 2019.
4
The current and future economic state of acute care surgery.急性护理手术的当前及未来经济状况。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Aug;87(2):413-419. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002334.
5
Hospital Operative Volume as a Quality Indicator for General Surgery Operations Performed Emergently in Geriatric Patients.老年患者急诊普外科手术的医院手术量作为质量指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jun;228(6):910-923. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
6
Emergency general surgery in geriatric patients: How should we evaluate hospital experience?老年患者的急诊普通外科:我们应该如何评估医院的经验?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Feb;86(2):189-195. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002142.
7
High-volume hospitals are associated with lower mortality among high-risk emergency general surgery patients.高容量医院与高危急诊普通外科患者的死亡率降低相关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):560-565. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001985.
8
Defining burden and severity of disease for emergency general surgery.定义急诊普通外科疾病的负担和严重程度。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Aug 28;2(1):e000089. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000089. eCollection 2017.
9
Emergency general surgery in geriatric patients: A statewide analysis of surgeon and hospital volume with outcomes.老年患者的急诊普通外科:基于手术医生和医院容量与结局的全州分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jun;84(6):864-875. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001829.
10
Critical differences between elective and emergency surgery: identifying domains for quality improvement in emergency general surgery.择期手术和急诊手术的关键差异:确定急诊普通外科质量改进的领域。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):832-838. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.017. Epub 2018 Jan 10.