OBJECTIVE

This two-phase study aimed to explore the influence of a university rural curriculum and clinical placements on pharmacists' choice to practise in a rural or remote area.

DESIGN

A sequential mixed-methods approach involved the design of both a questionnaire and semistructured in-depth interviews to collect quantitative and qualitative data.

SETTING

Regional, rural and remote practice areas according to the Pharmacy Access/Remoteness Index of Australia classifications.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-two pharmacists from varied areas of practice, working in rural and remote locations across Australia, participated in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

University curriculum and clinical placements during the degree and their influence on the current rural workforce.

RESULTS

In the survey sample, two-thirds of the current rural pharmacy workforce's choice of practice location was significantly influenced by positive rural placement experiences. Rural practice was, however, not included in the curriculum for 50% of the rural workforce in the sample, although graduates from regional universities experienced up to 80% more exposure to rural curricula. In this sample, rural origin was also not found to be a significant determinant of rural practice, while rural lifestyle, family commitments, remuneration, career opportunities and other contractual agreements have had a greater influence than university education.

CONCLUSION

Although the positive influence of rural placements has been identified, there is still a way to go in terms of the development of a meaningful rural curriculum. This highlights that universities have a role to play in addressing this issue to produce graduates who are better prepared for the opportunities and challenges of rural pharmacy practice.