• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对分子靶向药物的信息论I-II期设计,该设计不需要单调性假设。

An information theoretic phase I-II design for molecularly targeted agents that does not require an assumption of monotonicity.

作者信息

Mozgunov Pavel, Jaki Thomas

机构信息

Lancaster University UK.

出版信息

J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2019 Feb;68(2):347-367. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12293. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1111/rssc.12293
PMID:31007292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6472641/
Abstract

For many years phase I and phase II clinical trials have been conducted separately, but there has been a recent shift to combine these phases. Although a variety of phase I-II model-based designs for cytotoxic agents have been proposed in the literature, methods for molecularly targeted agents (TAs) are just starting to develop. The main challenge of the TA setting is the unknown dose-efficacy relationship that can have either an increasing, plateau or umbrella shape. To capture these, approaches with more parameters are needed or, alternatively, more orderings are required to account for the uncertainty in the dose-efficacy relationship. As a result, designs for more complex clinical trials, e.g. trials looking at schedules of a combination treatment involving TAs, have not been extensively studied yet. We propose a novel regimen finding design which is based on a derived efficacy-toxicity trade-off function. Because of its special properties, an accurate regimen selection can be achieved without any parametric or monotonicity assumptions. We illustrate how this design can be applied in the context of a complex combination-schedule clinical trial. We discuss practical and ethical issues such as coherence, delayed and missing efficacy responses, safety and futility constraints.

摘要

多年来,I期和II期临床试验都是分开进行的,但最近出现了将这两个阶段合并的趋势。尽管文献中已经提出了多种基于模型的细胞毒性药物I-II期设计方法,但分子靶向药物(TAs)的方法才刚刚开始发展。TA环境的主要挑战是未知的剂量-疗效关系,这种关系可能呈上升、平台或伞形。为了捕捉这些关系,需要更多参数的方法,或者需要更多的排序来考虑剂量-疗效关系的不确定性。因此,针对更复杂临床试验的设计,例如研究涉及TA的联合治疗方案的试验,尚未得到广泛研究。我们提出了一种基于导出的疗效-毒性权衡函数的新型方案寻找设计。由于其特殊性质,无需任何参数或单调性假设就能实现准确的方案选择。我们说明了这种设计如何应用于复杂的联合方案临床试验。我们讨论了一致性、延迟和缺失疗效反应、安全性和无效性限制等实际和伦理问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/7042b19cafc7/RSSC-68-347-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/1119178c0b56/RSSC-68-347-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/5d1b50bd55fb/RSSC-68-347-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/ad3f7f9d661e/RSSC-68-347-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/2e01c5eedd05/RSSC-68-347-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/7042b19cafc7/RSSC-68-347-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/1119178c0b56/RSSC-68-347-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/5d1b50bd55fb/RSSC-68-347-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/ad3f7f9d661e/RSSC-68-347-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/2e01c5eedd05/RSSC-68-347-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f29/6472641/7042b19cafc7/RSSC-68-347-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
An information theoretic phase I-II design for molecularly targeted agents that does not require an assumption of monotonicity.一种针对分子靶向药物的信息论I-II期设计,该设计不需要单调性假设。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2019 Feb;68(2):347-367. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12293. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
Bayesian optimization design for dose-finding based on toxicity and efficacy outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.基于I/II期临床试验中毒性和疗效结果的剂量探索的贝叶斯优化设计。
Pharm Stat. 2021 May;20(3):422-439. doi: 10.1002/pst.2085. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Modified isotonic regression based phase I/II clinical trial design identifying optimal biological dose.基于改良等渗回归的 I/II 期临床试验设计,确定最佳生物学剂量。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107139. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107139. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.假设部分随机排序的分子靶向药物联合使用的贝叶斯剂量探索设计
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
7
Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.分子靶向药物的I/II期剂量探索设计:使用适应性随机化确定平台期
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631763. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
A flexible design for advanced Phase I/II clinical trials with continuous efficacy endpoints.一种用于具有连续疗效终点的高级I/II期临床试验的灵活设计。
Biom J. 2019 Nov;61(6):1477-1492. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800313. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
Bayesian adaptive model selection design for optimal biological dose finding in phase I/II clinical trials.贝叶斯自适应模型选择设计在 I/II 期临床试验中的最优生物剂量探索。
Biostatistics. 2023 Apr 14;24(2):277-294. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab028.

引用本文的文献

1
Using circulating tumor DNA as a novel biomarker of efficacy for dose-finding designs in oncology.将循环肿瘤DNA作为肿瘤学剂量探索设计中疗效的新型生物标志物。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Aug;34(8):1665-1683. doi: 10.1177/09622802251350457. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
A seamless Phase I/II platform design with a time-to-event efficacy endpoint for potential COVID-19 therapies.具有时间事件疗效终点的 COVID-19 疗法的无缝 I/II 期平台设计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Nov;33(11-12):2115-2130. doi: 10.1177/09622802241288348. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
REDOMA: Bayesian random-effects dose-optimization meta-analysis using spike-and-slab priors.

本文引用的文献

1
Loss functions in restricted parameter spaces and their Bayesian applications.受限参数空间中的损失函数及其贝叶斯应用。
J Appl Stat. 2019 Mar 14;46(13):2314-2337. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1586848. eCollection 2019.
2
Bayesian adaptive dose-escalation designs for simultaneously estimating the optimal and maximum safe dose based on safety and efficacy.基于安全性和有效性同时估计最佳剂量和最大安全剂量的贝叶斯自适应剂量递增设计。
Pharm Stat. 2017 Nov;16(6):396-413. doi: 10.1002/pst.1818. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
3
International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001-10: a population-based registry study.
REDoMA:基于尖峰-哑块先验的贝叶斯随机效应剂量优化荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2024 Aug 15;43(18):3484-3502. doi: 10.1002/sim.10107. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies.双药联合疗法的非模型I期剂量递增设计比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):203-226. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220497. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Optimizing dose-schedule regimens with bayesian adaptive designs: opportunities and challenges.利用贝叶斯适应性设计优化剂量-给药方案:机遇与挑战
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1261312. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1261312. eCollection 2023.
6
Early phase clinical trials in oncology: Realising the potential of seamless designs.肿瘤学的早期临床试验:实现无缝设计的潜力。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Aug;189:112916. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 13.
7
Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.在 I 期联合方案剂量探索试验中部分有序连续再评估方法的实际应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 30;41(30):5789-5809. doi: 10.1002/sim.9594. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
A dose-finding design for dual-agent trials with patient-specific doses for one agent with application to an opiate detoxification trial.具有患者特异性剂量的双药物试验的剂量探索设计及其在阿片类药物戒毒试验中的应用。
Pharm Stat. 2022 Mar;21(2):476-495. doi: 10.1002/pst.2181. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
9
A novel statistical test for treatment differences in clinical trials using a response-adaptive forward-looking Gittins Index Rule.一种新的临床试验中处理差异的统计检验方法,使用响应自适应前瞻性吉廷斯指数规则。
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):86-97. doi: 10.1111/biom.13581. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
10
Bayesian adaptive model selection design for optimal biological dose finding in phase I/II clinical trials.贝叶斯自适应模型选择设计在 I/II 期临床试验中的最优生物剂量探索。
Biostatistics. 2023 Apr 14;24(2):277-294. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab028.
国际儿童癌症发病率,2001-2010 年:基于人群的注册研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):719-731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30186-9. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.分子靶向药物的I/II期剂量探索设计:使用适应性随机化确定平台期
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631763. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
Bayesian adaptive dose-escalation procedures for binary and continuous responses utilizing a gain function.利用增益函数的二元和连续反应的贝叶斯自适应剂量递增程序。
Pharm Stat. 2015 Nov-Dec;14(6):479-87. doi: 10.1002/pst.1706. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
Non-monotonic dose-response relationships and endocrine disruptors: a qualitative method of assessment.非单调剂量反应关系与内分泌干扰物:一种定性评估方法。
Environ Health. 2015 Feb 11;14:13. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-14-13.
7
Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial.派姆单抗治疗伊匹单抗难治性晚期黑色素瘤的抗程序性死亡受体 1 治疗:一项 I 期试验的随机剂量比较队列。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1109-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60958-2. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Defining dose-limiting toxicity for phase 1 trials of molecularly targeted agents: results of a DLT-TARGETT international survey.定义分子靶向药物 1 期临床试验的剂量限制性毒性:DLT-TARGETT 国际调查结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2050-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.030. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
9
Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.分子靶向药物肿瘤学试验的无缝I/II期适应性设计
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(5):903-20. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920873. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.用于确定分子靶向药物最佳生物学剂量的适应性设计。
Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):319-327. doi: 10.1177/1740774514529848.