• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于确定分子靶向药物最佳生物学剂量的适应性设计。

Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

作者信息

Zang Yong, Lee J Jack, Yuan Ying

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):319-327. doi: 10.1177/1740774514529848.

DOI:10.1177/1740774514529848
PMID:24844841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4239216/
Abstract

Background Traditionally, the purpose of a dose-finding design in cancer is to find the maximum tolerated dose based solely on toxicity. However, for molecularly targeted agents, little toxicity may arise within the therapeutic dose range and the dose-response curves may not be monotonic. This challenges the principle that more is better, which is widely accepted for conventional chemotherapy. Methods We propose three adaptive dose-finding designs for trials evaluating molecularly targeted agents, for which the dose-response curves are unimodal or plateaued. The goal of these designs is to find the optimal biological dose, which is defined as the lowest dose with the highest rate of efficacy while safe. The first proposed design is parametric and assumes a logistic dose-efficacy curve for dose finding, the second design is nonparametric and uses the isotonic regression to identify the optimal biological dose, and the third design has the spirit of a 'semiparametric' approach by assuming a logistic model only locally around the current dose. Results We conducted extensive simulation studies to investigate the operating characteristics of the proposed designs. Simulation studies show that the nonparametric and semiparametric designs have good operating characteristics for finding the optimal biological dose. Limitations The proposed designs assume a binary endpoint. Extension of the proposed designs to ordinal and time-to-event endpoints is worth further investigation. Conclusion Among the three proposed designs, the nonparametric and semiparametric designs yield consistently good operating characteristics and thus are recommended for practical use. The software to implement these two designs is available for free download at http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yyuan/ .

摘要

背景 传统上,癌症剂量探索设计的目的是仅基于毒性来找到最大耐受剂量。然而,对于分子靶向药物,在治疗剂量范围内可能几乎没有毒性,且剂量反应曲线可能不是单调的。这对“越多越好”这一传统化疗中被广泛接受的原则提出了挑战。方法 我们为评估分子靶向药物的试验提出了三种适应性剂量探索设计,这些药物的剂量反应曲线是单峰或平台型的。这些设计的目标是找到最佳生物学剂量,其定义为在安全的同时具有最高疗效率的最低剂量。提出的第一种设计是参数化的,在剂量探索时假设为逻辑剂量-疗效曲线,第二种设计是非参数化的,使用等渗回归来确定最佳生物学剂量,第三种设计具有“半参数化”方法的特点,仅在当前剂量附近局部假设逻辑模型。结果 我们进行了广泛的模拟研究来考察所提出设计的操作特性。模拟研究表明,非参数化和半参数化设计在寻找最佳生物学剂量方面具有良好的操作特性。局限性 所提出的设计假设为二元终点。将所提出的设计扩展到有序和事件发生时间终点值得进一步研究。结论 在提出的三种设计中,非参数化和半参数化设计始终具有良好的操作特性,因此推荐实际使用。实现这两种设计的软件可在http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yyuan/免费下载。

相似文献

1
Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.用于确定分子靶向药物最佳生物学剂量的适应性设计。
Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):319-327. doi: 10.1177/1740774514529848.
2
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.假设部分随机排序的分子靶向药物联合使用的贝叶斯剂量探索设计
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
3
Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.分子靶向药物肿瘤学试验的无缝I/II期适应性设计
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(5):903-20. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920873. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Modified isotonic regression based phase I/II clinical trial design identifying optimal biological dose.基于改良等渗回归的 I/II 期临床试验设计,确定最佳生物学剂量。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107139. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107139. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.分子靶向药物的I/II期剂量探索设计:使用适应性随机化确定平台期
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631763. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Bridging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials in different ethnic populations.不同种族人群I期临床试验的桥接连续重新评估方法。
Stat Med. 2015 May 10;34(10):1681-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.6442. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship.在假设剂量反应关系单调的情况下,用于选择最大有效剂量的II期肿瘤试验的贝叶斯设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jul 29;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-95.
8
A Bayesian basket trial design using a calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model.一种使用校准贝叶斯分层模型的贝叶斯篮子试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;15(2):149-158. doi: 10.1177/1740774518755122. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.用于多种毒性的新型准连续终点的剂量发现设计。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2728-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.5737. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10
Bayesian optimization design for dose-finding based on toxicity and efficacy outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.基于I/II期临床试验中毒性和疗效结果的剂量探索的贝叶斯优化设计。
Pharm Stat. 2021 May;20(3):422-439. doi: 10.1002/pst.2085. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
UNITED: A Unified Transparent and Efficient Phase I/II Trial Design for Dose Optimization Accounting for Ordinal Graded, Continuous and Mixed Toxicity and Efficacy Endpoints.UNITED:一种统一、透明且高效的I/II期试验设计,用于考虑有序分级、连续及混合毒性和疗效终点的剂量优化。
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70098. doi: 10.1002/sim.70098.
2
A Bayesian Dynamic Model-Based Adaptive Design for Oncology Dose Optimization in Phase I/II Clinical Trials.用于I/II期临床试验肿瘤学剂量优化的基于贝叶斯动态模型的自适应设计
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2451. doi: 10.1002/pst.2451. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
3
REDOMA: Bayesian random-effects dose-optimization meta-analysis using spike-and-slab priors.REDoMA:基于尖峰-哑块先验的贝叶斯随机效应剂量优化荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2024 Aug 15;43(18):3484-3502. doi: 10.1002/sim.10107. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
A generalized phase 1-2-3 design integrating dose optimization with confirmatory treatment comparison.一种将剂量优化与确证性治疗比较相结合的广义的 1-2-3 期设计。
Biometrics. 2024 Jan 29;80(1). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujad022.
5
Statistical and practical considerations in planning and conduct of dose-optimization trials.规划和实施剂量优化试验的统计学和实际考虑因素。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):273-286. doi: 10.1177/17407745231207085. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.适用于靶向药物和免疫疗法的最佳生物剂量的适应性 I- II 期临床试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):298-307. doi: 10.1177/17407745231220661. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Looking ahead in early-phase trial design to improve the drug development process: examples in oncology.展望早期临床试验设计,以改善药物研发流程:肿瘤学实例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01979-5.
8
Metronomic Chemotherapy: Anti-Tumor Pathways and Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.节拍化疗:抗肿瘤途径及与免疫检查点抑制剂的联合应用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;15(9):2471. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092471.
9
Modified isotonic regression based phase I/II clinical trial design identifying optimal biological dose.基于改良等渗回归的 I/II 期临床试验设计,确定最佳生物学剂量。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107139. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107139. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
10
DROID: dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development.DROID:肿瘤药物研发中优化剂量的剂量范围方法。
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):2907-2919. doi: 10.1111/biom.13840. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Seamless phase I-II trial design for assessing toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.针对靶向药物的毒性和疗效评估的无缝 I- II 期试验设计。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 15;17(4):640-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1262. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
2
Potential relevance of bell-shaped and u-shaped dose-responses for the therapeutic targeting of angiogenesis in cancer.潜在的钟形和 U 形剂量反应与癌症中血管生成的治疗靶向相关。
Dose Response. 2010 Apr 23;8(3):253-84. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-049.Reynolds.
3
Early oncology clinical trial design in the era of molecular-targeted agents.分子靶向药物时代的早期肿瘤临床试验设计。
Future Oncol. 2010 Aug;6(8):1339-52. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.92.
4
Model-based phase I designs incorporating toxicity and efficacy for single and dual agent drug combinations: methods and challenges.基于模型的 I 期设计,纳入毒性和疗效,用于单药和双药药物组合:方法和挑战。
Stat Med. 2010 May 10;29(10):1077-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.3706.
5
An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.新疗法的 I 期研究的最佳规划、设计和实施概述。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1710-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1993. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
6
Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.I 期肿瘤学研究:有证据表明,在靶向治疗时代,接受较低剂量治疗的患者并未表现出更差的结果。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1289-97. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
7
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.I期癌症临床试验中的剂量递增方法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.
8
Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter?新型分子靶向药物I期试验中的临床获益:剂量重要吗?
Br J Cancer. 2009 May 5;100(9):1373-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605030.
9
Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.基于分子靶向终点的剂量递增试验设计。
Stat Med. 2005 Jul 30;24(14):2171-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.2102.
10
Phase I trial design for solid tumor studies of targeted, non-cytotoxic agents: theory and practice.实体瘤靶向非细胞毒性药物研究的I期试验设计:理论与实践
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 7;96(13):990-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh182.