Suppr超能文献

用于确定分子靶向药物最佳生物学剂量的适应性设计。

Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

作者信息

Zang Yong, Lee J Jack, Yuan Ying

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):319-327. doi: 10.1177/1740774514529848.

Abstract

Background Traditionally, the purpose of a dose-finding design in cancer is to find the maximum tolerated dose based solely on toxicity. However, for molecularly targeted agents, little toxicity may arise within the therapeutic dose range and the dose-response curves may not be monotonic. This challenges the principle that more is better, which is widely accepted for conventional chemotherapy. Methods We propose three adaptive dose-finding designs for trials evaluating molecularly targeted agents, for which the dose-response curves are unimodal or plateaued. The goal of these designs is to find the optimal biological dose, which is defined as the lowest dose with the highest rate of efficacy while safe. The first proposed design is parametric and assumes a logistic dose-efficacy curve for dose finding, the second design is nonparametric and uses the isotonic regression to identify the optimal biological dose, and the third design has the spirit of a 'semiparametric' approach by assuming a logistic model only locally around the current dose. Results We conducted extensive simulation studies to investigate the operating characteristics of the proposed designs. Simulation studies show that the nonparametric and semiparametric designs have good operating characteristics for finding the optimal biological dose. Limitations The proposed designs assume a binary endpoint. Extension of the proposed designs to ordinal and time-to-event endpoints is worth further investigation. Conclusion Among the three proposed designs, the nonparametric and semiparametric designs yield consistently good operating characteristics and thus are recommended for practical use. The software to implement these two designs is available for free download at http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yyuan/ .

摘要

背景 传统上,癌症剂量探索设计的目的是仅基于毒性来找到最大耐受剂量。然而,对于分子靶向药物,在治疗剂量范围内可能几乎没有毒性,且剂量反应曲线可能不是单调的。这对“越多越好”这一传统化疗中被广泛接受的原则提出了挑战。方法 我们为评估分子靶向药物的试验提出了三种适应性剂量探索设计,这些药物的剂量反应曲线是单峰或平台型的。这些设计的目标是找到最佳生物学剂量,其定义为在安全的同时具有最高疗效率的最低剂量。提出的第一种设计是参数化的,在剂量探索时假设为逻辑剂量-疗效曲线,第二种设计是非参数化的,使用等渗回归来确定最佳生物学剂量,第三种设计具有“半参数化”方法的特点,仅在当前剂量附近局部假设逻辑模型。结果 我们进行了广泛的模拟研究来考察所提出设计的操作特性。模拟研究表明,非参数化和半参数化设计在寻找最佳生物学剂量方面具有良好的操作特性。局限性 所提出的设计假设为二元终点。将所提出的设计扩展到有序和事件发生时间终点值得进一步研究。结论 在提出的三种设计中,非参数化和半参数化设计始终具有良好的操作特性,因此推荐实际使用。实现这两种设计的软件可在http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yyuan/免费下载。

相似文献

1
Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.
Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):319-327. doi: 10.1177/1740774514529848.
2
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
3
Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(5):903-20. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920873. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Modified isotonic regression based phase I/II clinical trial design identifying optimal biological dose.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107139. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107139. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631763. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Bridging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials in different ethnic populations.
Stat Med. 2015 May 10;34(10):1681-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.6442. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
A Bayesian basket trial design using a calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model.
Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;15(2):149-158. doi: 10.1177/1740774518755122. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2728-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.5737. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10

引用本文的文献

2
A Bayesian Dynamic Model-Based Adaptive Design for Oncology Dose Optimization in Phase I/II Clinical Trials.
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2451. doi: 10.1002/pst.2451. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
3
REDOMA: Bayesian random-effects dose-optimization meta-analysis using spike-and-slab priors.
Stat Med. 2024 Aug 15;43(18):3484-3502. doi: 10.1002/sim.10107. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Statistical and practical considerations in planning and conduct of dose-optimization trials.
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):273-286. doi: 10.1177/17407745231207085. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):298-307. doi: 10.1177/17407745231220661. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Looking ahead in early-phase trial design to improve the drug development process: examples in oncology.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01979-5.
8
Metronomic Chemotherapy: Anti-Tumor Pathways and Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;15(9):2471. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092471.
9
Modified isotonic regression based phase I/II clinical trial design identifying optimal biological dose.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107139. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107139. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
10
DROID: dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development.
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):2907-2919. doi: 10.1111/biom.13840. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Seamless phase I-II trial design for assessing toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 15;17(4):640-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1262. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
2
Potential relevance of bell-shaped and u-shaped dose-responses for the therapeutic targeting of angiogenesis in cancer.
Dose Response. 2010 Apr 23;8(3):253-84. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-049.Reynolds.
3
Early oncology clinical trial design in the era of molecular-targeted agents.
Future Oncol. 2010 Aug;6(8):1339-52. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.92.
5
An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1710-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1993. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
6
Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1289-97. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
7
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.
8
Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter?
Br J Cancer. 2009 May 5;100(9):1373-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605030.
9
Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.
Stat Med. 2005 Jul 30;24(14):2171-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.2102.
10
Phase I trial design for solid tumor studies of targeted, non-cytotoxic agents: theory and practice.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 7;96(13):990-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh182.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验