Lee Kim May, Wason James
MRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
J Stat Plan Inference. 2019 Mar;199:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2018.06.004.
Precision medicine, aka stratified/personalized medicine, is becoming more pronounced in the medical field due to advancement in computational ability to learn about patient genomic backgrounds. A biomaker, i.e. a type of biological process indicator, is often used in precision medicine to classify patient population into several subgroups. The aim of precision medicine is to tailor treatment regimes for different patient subgroups who suffer from the same disease. A multi-arm design could be conducted to explore the effect of treatment regimes on different biomarker subgroups. However, if treatments work only on certain subgroups, which is often the case, enrolling all patient subgroups in a confirmatory trial would increase the burden of a study. Having observed a phase II trial, we propose a design framework for finding an optimal design that could be implemented in a phase III study or a confirmatory trial. We consider two elements in our approach: Bayesian data analysis of observed data, and design of experiments. The first tool selects subgroups and treatments to be enrolled in the future trial whereas the second tool provides an optimal treatment randomization scheme for each selected/enrolled subgroups. Considering two independent treatments and two independent biomarkers, we illustrate our approach using simulation studies. We demonstrate efficiency gain, i.e. high probability of recommending truly effective treatments in the right subgroup, of the optimal design found by our framework over a randomized controlled trial and a biomarker-treatment linked trial.
精准医学,又称分层医学/个性化医学,由于了解患者基因组背景的计算能力的进步,在医学领域正变得越来越显著。生物标志物,即一种生物过程指标,在精准医学中经常被用来将患者群体分为几个亚组。精准医学的目的是为患有相同疾病的不同患者亚组量身定制治疗方案。可以进行多臂设计以探索治疗方案对不同生物标志物亚组的效果。然而,如果治疗仅对某些亚组有效,情况通常如此,那么在确证性试验中纳入所有患者亚组会增加研究负担。在观察了一项II期试验后,我们提出了一个设计框架,用于找到可在III期研究或确证性试验中实施的最优设计。我们在方法中考虑两个要素:对观察数据的贝叶斯数据分析和实验设计。第一个工具选择要纳入未来试验的亚组和治疗方案,而第二个工具为每个选定/纳入的亚组提供最优治疗随机化方案。考虑两种独立的治疗方法和两种独立的生物标志物,我们通过模拟研究来说明我们的方法。我们证明了我们框架找到的最优设计相对于随机对照试验和生物标志物-治疗关联试验的效率提升,即在正确的亚组中推荐真正有效治疗方法的高概率。