Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: Will it ever improve?
作者信息
Gogtay Nithya J
机构信息
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
出版信息
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):49-50. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_11_19.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: Will it ever improve?随机对照试验的报告：它会有所改善吗？
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):49-50. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_11_19.
2
Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.提高心胸外科随机对照试验报告的质量：前进的方向。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.056.
3
Randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: a 20-year review of reporting standards, methodologic quality, and impact.整形手术中的随机对照试验：对报告标准、方法学质量及影响的20年回顾
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Oct;122(4):1253-1263. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181858f16.
4
Quality of reporting of chemotherapy compliance in randomized controlled trials of breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗随机对照试验中化疗依从性报告的质量
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;45(6):520-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv043. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
5
Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011.2006 年至 2011 年发表在领先正畸期刊上的随机对照试验摘要的报告质量。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Oct;142(4):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.013.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: obstetrical journal guidelines.随机对照研究的质量标准：妇产科杂志指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 May;3(3):100334. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100334. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
The Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist: Methodology of Development of a Reporting Guideline Specific to Rehabilitation.随机对照试验康复检查表：专门针对康复的报告指南制定方法。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Mar;99(3):210-215. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001370.
9
10
Reporting quality of stepped wedge design randomized trials: a systematic review protocol.阶梯楔形设计随机试验的报告质量：一项系统评价方案
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 8;8:261-6. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S103098. eCollection 2016.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluating the use of SPIRIT on participant retention in randomised trials: Challenges in reporting and implications for practice.评估《标准方案条目：建议与规范》（SPIRIT）在随机试验中对参与者保留率的作用：报告中的挑战及对实践的影响
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0327110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327110. eCollection 2025.
2
Statistical analysis of publicly funded cluster randomised controlled trials: a review of the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library.公共资助的整群随机对照试验的统计学分析：国家卫生研究院期刊文库回顾。
Trials. 2022 Feb 4;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06025-1.
3
Reporting quality of surgical randomised controlled trials in head and neck cancer: a systematic review.头颈部癌手术随机对照试验的报告质量：一项系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov;278(11):4125-4133. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06694-9. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
本文引用的文献
1
The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals.对发表在印度医学期刊上的随机对照试验的质量评估。
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):79-83. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_60_18.
2
An assessment of the compliance of randomized controlled trials published in two high impact journals with the CONSORT statement.对发表于两份高影响力期刊的随机对照试验与CONSORT声明的依从性评估。
Natl Med J India. 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):79-82. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.253165.
3
Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update.尽管有21年的报告指南，但医学文献的描述仍不充分吗？——综述的系统评价：更新版
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Sep 27;11:495-510. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S155103. eCollection 2018.
4
Addressing overestimation of the prevalence of depression based on self-report screening questionnaires.基于自我报告筛查问卷解决抑郁症患病率高估问题。
CMAJ. 2018 Jan 15;190(2):E44-E49. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170691.
5
Quality of reporting of pilot and feasibility cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.报告试点和可行性集群随机试验质量的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e016970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016970.
6
Evidence for Health Decision Making - Beyond Randomized, Controlled Trials.健康决策的证据——超越随机对照试验
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):465-475. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1614394.
7
CONSORT item reporting quality in the top ten ranked journals of critical care medicine in 2011: a retrospective analysis.2011年重症医学排名前十的期刊中CONSORT条目报告质量：一项回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0128061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128061. eCollection 2015.
8
Compliance of randomized controlled trials in trauma surgery with the CONSORT statement.创伤外科随机对照试验与 CONSORT 声明的一致性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):562-72. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a5399e.
9
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.提高随机对照试验报告的质量。CONSORT声明。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637.
Zotero 插件