• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对发表在印度医学期刊上的随机对照试验的质量评估。

The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals.

作者信息

Goenka Luxitaa, Rajendran Suramya, Arumugam Kalaiselvi, Rani Jamuna, George Melvin

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, SRM MCH and RC, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):79-83. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_60_18.

DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_60_18
PMID:31008074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6463507/
Abstract

AIM

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we sought to evaluate if the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in the year 2017 among the Indian medical journals (IMJs) complied with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and identify domains where reporting could be improved.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify all the IMJs that published RCTs in the year 2017. In the archives of the identified journals, the number of published RCTs was identified and the full text was obtained. We selected articles that stated RCT in abstract and title and that evaluated the safety and efficacy of all therapeutic and preventive interventions.

RESULTS

A total of seven IMJs comprising of the Indian Journal of Anesthesia, Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Indian Journal of Pharmacology, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, and Indian Journal of Medical and Pediatric Oncology that published a total of 84 RCTs were included. The mean compliance score of all the RCTs was 13.7 ± 2.66 (57%). Most RCTs had serious reporting deficiencies in the methodology and result sections.

DISCUSSION

In spite of journals making it mandatory for prospective authors to comply with the CONSORT guidelines, it is intriguing that there continues to be significant lacunae in reporting RCTs adequately in most IMJs.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent need to impart training to the medical community of our country in clinical research methods and reporting of RCTs.

摘要

目的

在这项回顾性横断面研究中,我们试图评估2017年印度医学期刊(IMJ)上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)是否符合《试验报告统一标准》(CONSORT)指南,并确定报告中可以改进的领域。

方法

使用PubMed和谷歌学术进行文献检索,以识别2017年发表RCT的所有IMJ。在选定期刊的存档中,确定发表的RCT数量并获取全文。我们选择了在摘要和标题中注明RCT且评估了所有治疗和预防干预措施安全性和有效性的文章。

结果

总共纳入了7种IMJ,包括《印度麻醉学杂志》《印度皮肤病、性病和麻风病学杂志》《印度药理学杂志》《印度眼科学杂志》《妇产科学杂志》《药理学与药物治疗学杂志》以及《印度医学与儿科肿瘤学杂志》,这些期刊共发表了84项RCT。所有RCT的平均合规分数为13.7±2.66(57%)。大多数RCT在方法和结果部分存在严重的报告缺陷。

讨论

尽管期刊要求前瞻性作者必须遵守CONSORT指南,但有趣的是,大多数IMJ在充分报告RCT方面仍然存在重大缺陷。

结论

迫切需要对我国医学界进行临床研究方法和RCT报告方面的培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/c5c1770f6fba/PCR-10-79-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/42fb4bbc1ada/PCR-10-79-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/be67ae2ec04f/PCR-10-79-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/c5c1770f6fba/PCR-10-79-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/42fb4bbc1ada/PCR-10-79-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/be67ae2ec04f/PCR-10-79-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8d/6463507/c5c1770f6fba/PCR-10-79-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals.对发表在印度医学期刊上的随机对照试验的质量评估。
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):79-83. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_60_18.
2
Adherence of Randomized Controlled Trials to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines: A Survey of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2011-2016 in 3 Periodontology Journals.随机对照试验对 2010 年 CONSORT 报告标准的依从性:对 2011-2016 年 3 种牙周病学期刊发表的随机对照试验的调查。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019 Sep;19(3):260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics and gynecology.妇产科随机对照试验的严谨性、可重复性和透明度。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100450. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100450. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.神经外科学随机对照试验报告标准。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):280-5. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS091770. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
5
Have CONSORT guidelines improved the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in public health dentistry journals?CONSORT指南是否提高了发表在公共卫生牙科学期刊上的随机对照试验的报告质量?
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2013;11(2):95-103. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a29359.
6
Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications.临床试验注册印度报告的方法比印度期刊出版物要好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;66(1):10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.011. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).编辑政策与随机对照试验报告:对印度医学期刊作者指南的调查及试验报告评估(2004 - 2005年)
Natl Med J India. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):62-8.
8
Assessment of adherence to the statistical components of consolidated standards of reporting trials statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trials from five pharmacology journals.评估五本药理学杂志中随机对照试验报告质量的《报告试验的统一标准》统计部分的依从性。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):128-31. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184816.
9
Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals.发表于高质量外科杂志的随机试验报告质量
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):565-571.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
10
Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study.订阅和开放获取期刊中随机对照试验摘要报告的完整性:横断面研究。
Trials. 2019 Dec 2;20(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3781-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in an Indian and International Pharmacology Journal From 2019 to 2023.2019年至2023年发表于印度及国际药理学杂志的随机对照试验对2010年《试验报告统一标准》指南的遵循情况评估
Cureus. 2025 Mar 12;17(3):e80450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80450. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Assessment of Reporting Quality of Drug-Related Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in India and Published in MEDLINE-Indexed Indian Journals Over a Decade: A Systematic Review.对在印度开展并发表于MEDLINE索引的印度期刊上的药物相关随机对照试验报告质量的评估:一项系统评价(为期十年)
Cureus. 2023 Jan 29;15(1):e34353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34353. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical trial registration: A practical perspective.临床试验注册:实践视角
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;62(1):10-15. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_761_17.
2
Reporting quality of randomized-controlled trials in multiple sclerosis from 2000 to 2015, based on CONSORT statement.基于 CONSORT 声明报告 2000 年至 2015 年多发性硬化症随机对照试验的报告质量。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Sep;9:135-9. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
3
Assessment of adherence to the statistical components of consolidated standards of reporting trials statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trials from five pharmacology journals.
The utilization of systematic review evidence in formulating India's National Health Programme guidelines between 2007 and 2021.系统评价证据在制定印度 2007 年至 2021 年国家卫生计划指南中的利用。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):435-453. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad008.
4
Quality of the Systematic Reviews in Cochrane Gynecological Cancer Group and Their Understudied RCTs.考科蓝妇科癌症小组系统评价的质量及其未充分研究的随机对照试验
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Aug;72(Suppl 1):346-351. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01655-6. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
5
Completeness of reporting and outcome switching in trials published in Indian journals from 2017 to 2019: A cross-sectional study.2017年至2019年印度期刊发表的试验报告的完整性和结果转换:一项横断面研究。
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):77-81. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_64_20. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
6
Methodological quality and reporting of randomised controlled trials published in Indian medical journals.印度医学期刊发表的随机对照试验的方法学质量与报告情况
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Apr;11(4):1584-1585. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1741_21. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
7
Compliance of Published Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effect of Physical Activity on Primary Dysmenorrhea with the Consortium's Integrated Report on Clinical Trials Statement: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature.已发表的关于体育活动对原发性痛经影响的随机对照试验与该联盟临床试验综合报告声明的合规性:文献的批判性评价
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Nov 7;25(6):445-454. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_223_19. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
8
Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: Will it ever improve?随机对照试验的报告:它会有所改善吗?
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):49-50. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_11_19.
评估五本药理学杂志中随机对照试验报告质量的《报告试验的统一标准》统计部分的依从性。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):128-31. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184816.
4
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in ten academic Indian dental journals.十本印度学术牙科期刊中随机对照试验的报告质量
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;27(2):116-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.183132.
5
An Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for the Reporting of Group Sequential Randomised Controlled Trials: A Methodological Systematic Review.CONSORT 2010声明在成组序贯随机对照试验报告方面的缺点调查:一项方法学系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 3;10(11):e0141104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141104. eCollection 2015.
6
Randomization methods in emergency setting trials: a descriptive review.急诊环境试验中的随机化方法:描述性综述
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):46-54. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1163. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
7
A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature.系统评价卫生保健文献报告规范的依从性。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 May 6;6:169-88. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S43952. Print 2013.
8
Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications.临床试验注册印度报告的方法比印度期刊出版物要好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;66(1):10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.011. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 解释和说明:报告平行组随机试验的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
10
Randomized controlled trials: part 17 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.随机对照试验:系列评估科学出版物第 17 部分。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Sep;108(39):663-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0663. Epub 2011 Sep 30.