Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 22;7(4):e11831. doi: 10.2196/11831.
Smartphone apps promise to enhance the reach of evidence-based interventions (cognitive behavior therapy, contingency management and therapeutic education system) for populations with substance use disorders, with minimal disruption to health systems. However, further studies are needed to systematically evaluate smartphone apps targeting alcohol and illicit substances.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the functionality, aesthetics, and quality of information of free or low-cost apps claiming to target alcohol, benzodiazepine, cocaine, crack/cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and heroin use using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and critical content analysis.
A systematic search of iTunes and Google Play app stores for free or low-cost apps facilitating recovery was conducted in March 2018 and yielded 904 apps using the keywords described in previous studies (eg, recovery, sobriety, sober, alcohol, and heroin). An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, behavioral informatics, and public health reviewers trained in substance use disorders conducted a descriptive analysis of 74 apps categorized as reducing use. In addition to the MARS scale, a descriptive analysis of relevant apps was conducted by the study team to assess for quality indicators emphasized by expert guidelines and review articles.
Most apps (n=74) claimed to reduce use or promote abstinence and yielded an overall low median MARS score of 2.82 (0.55) and a wide range of scores (1.64, 4.20). Ratings were also low for engagement (2.75 (0.72)), functionality (3.64 (0.78)), aesthetics (3.03 (0.87)), information (2.82 (0.62)), and satisfaction (1.76 (0.67)) subdomains. Innovative design and content features elicited in the review included initial assessments of substance use following app download, tracking substance use, and related consequences (eg, cost or calorie intake), remote and proximate peer support per geospatial positioning, and allowing users and family members of individuals with substance use disorders to locate 12-step meetings, treatment programs, and mental health services. Few apps integrated evidence-based psychotherapeutic (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] or motivational interviewing) and pharmacologic interventions (eg, naloxone or buprenorphine).
Few commercially available apps yielded in our search integrated evidence-based interventions (eg, extended-release naltrexone, buprenorphine, naloxone, Self-Management and Recovery Training recovery, or CBT), and a concerning number of apps promoted harmful drinking and illicit substance use.
智能手机应用程序有望在最小程度干扰卫生系统的情况下,扩大针对物质使用障碍人群的循证干预措施(认知行为疗法、随附管理和治疗教育系统)的覆盖范围。然而,需要进一步的研究来系统地评估针对酒精和非法物质的智能手机应用程序。
本研究旨在使用经过验证的移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)和关键内容分析,评估声称针对酒精、苯二氮䓬类、可卡因、快克/可卡因、冰毒和海洛因使用的免费或低成本应用程序的功能、美观和信息质量。
2018 年 3 月,我们对 iTunes 和 Google Play 应用商店进行了系统搜索,以查找促进康复的免费或低成本应用程序,并使用先前研究中描述的关键字(例如恢复、清醒、酒精和海洛因)获得了 904 个应用程序。一个由临床医生、行为信息学和公共卫生专家组成的跨学科团队对 74 个被归类为减少使用的应用程序进行了描述性分析。除了 MARS 量表外,研究小组还对相关应用程序进行了描述性分析,以评估专家指南和综述文章强调的质量指标。
大多数应用程序(n=74)声称可减少使用或促进戒除,并得出总体较低的中位数 MARS 得分为 2.82(0.55)和广泛的得分范围(1.64,4.20)。参与度(2.75(0.72))、功能(3.64(0.78))、美观(3.03(0.87))、信息(2.82(0.62))和满意度(1.76(0.67))等子领域的评分也较低。审查中得出的创新设计和内容特征包括在应用程序下载后对物质使用进行初步评估、跟踪物质使用和相关后果(例如成本或卡路里摄入)、根据地理位置提供远程和邻近的同伴支持,以及允许有物质使用障碍的个人及其家属找到 12 步会议、治疗计划和心理健康服务。很少有应用程序整合了基于证据的心理治疗(例如认知行为疗法[CBT]或动机访谈)和药物干预(例如纳洛酮或丁丙诺啡)。
我们的搜索中很少有市售应用程序集成了基于证据的干预措施(例如,纳曲酮或丁丙诺啡、纳洛酮、自我管理和康复培训康复、或 CBT),而令人担忧的是,许多应用程序促进了有害饮酒和非法物质使用。