• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《欧洲跨境卫生数据交换路线图:意大利案例研究》。

The European cross-border health data exchange roadmap: Case study in the Italian setting.

机构信息

Telbios S.r.l, Milan, Italy.

Fondazione Santobono Pausilipon, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103183. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103183
PMID:31009760
Abstract

Health data exchange is a major challenge due to the sensitive information and the privacy issues entailed. Considering the European context, in which health data must be exchanged between different European Union (EU) Member States, each having a different national regulatory framework as well as different national healthcare structures, the challenge appears even greater. Europe has tried to address this challenge via the epSOS ("Smart Open Services for European Patients") project in 2008, a European large-scale pilot on cross-border sharing of specific health data and services. The adoption of the framework is an ongoing activity, with most Member States planning its implementation by 2020. Yet, this framework is quite generic and leaves a wide space to each EU Member State regarding the definition of roles, processes, workflows and especially the specific integration with the National Infrastructures for eHealth. The aim of this paper is to present the current landscape of the evolving eHealth infrastructure for cross-border health data exchange in Europe, as a result of past and ongoing initiatives, and illustrate challenges, open issues and limitations through a specific case study describing how Italy is approaching its adoption and accommodates the identified barriers. To this end, the paper discusses ethical, regulatory and organizational issues, also focusing on technical aspects, such as interoperability and cybersecurity. Regarding cybersecurity aspects per se, we present the approach of the KONFIDO EU-funded project, which aims to reinforce trust and security in European cross-border health data exchange by leveraging novel approaches and cutting-edge technologies, such as homomorphic encryption, photonic Physical Unclonable Functions (p-PUF), a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system, and blockchain-based auditing. In particular, we explain how KONFIDO will test its outcomes through a dedicated pilot based on a realistic scenario, in which Italy is involved in health data exchange with other European countries.

摘要

健康数据交换是一个主要挑战,因为涉及到敏感信息和隐私问题。考虑到欧洲的情况,在欧洲联盟(EU)成员国之间必须交换健康数据,每个成员国都有不同的国家监管框架和不同的国家医疗保健结构,因此挑战更大。欧洲曾试图通过 2008 年的 epSOS(“面向欧洲患者的智能开放服务”)项目来应对这一挑战,这是一个关于特定健康数据和服务跨境共享的欧洲大型试点项目。该框架的采用是一项正在进行的活动,大多数成员国计划在 2020 年前实施该框架。然而,该框架相当通用,为每个欧盟成员国在定义角色、流程、工作流程以及特别是与国家电子卫生基础设施的具体整合方面留下了很大的空间。本文旨在展示过去和正在进行的各项举措在欧洲跨境健康数据交换方面不断发展的电子卫生基础设施的现状,并通过描述意大利如何采用和应对已确定障碍的具体案例研究,说明挑战、未决问题和局限性。为此,本文讨论了伦理、监管和组织问题,还重点关注了互操作性和网络安全等技术方面。关于网络安全方面本身,我们介绍了 KONFIDO 欧盟资助项目的方法,该项目旨在通过利用新方法和最先进技术,例如同态加密、光子物理不可克隆功能(p-PUF)、安全信息和事件管理(SIEM)系统以及基于区块链的审计,加强欧洲跨境健康数据交换的信任和安全性。特别是,我们解释了 KONFIDO 将如何通过基于实际场景的专门试点来测试其成果,其中意大利参与了与其他欧洲国家的健康数据交换。

相似文献

1
The European cross-border health data exchange roadmap: Case study in the Italian setting.《欧洲跨境卫生数据交换路线图:意大利案例研究》。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103183. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
2
Comprehensive user requirements engineering methodology for secure and interoperable health data exchange.安全且互操作的健康数据交换的全面用户需求工程方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0664-0.
3
Developing an infrastructure for secure patient summary exchange in the EU context: Lessons learned from the KONFIDO project.在欧盟背景下开发安全的患者摘要交换基础设施:从 KONFIDO 项目中吸取的经验教训。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211021459. doi: 10.1177/14604582211021459.
4
Citizen Perspectives on Cross-Border eHealth Data Exchange: A European Survey.公民对跨境电子健康数据交换的看法:一项欧洲调查。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:719-723. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190317.
5
OpenNCP: a novel framework to foster cross-border e-Health services.OpenNCP:一个促进跨境电子健康服务的新型框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:617-21.
6
The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment.新的欧洲互操作性框架作为促进公民赋权的数字转型的推动者。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103166. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103166. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
7
Healthcare data warehouse system supporting cross-border interoperability.支持跨境互操作性的医疗保健数据仓库系统。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):1321-1332. doi: 10.1177/1460458219876793. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
Towards a Cross-domain Infrastructure to Support Electronic Identification and Capability Lookup for Cross-border ePrescription/Patient Summary Services.构建跨域基础设施以支持跨境电子处方/患者摘要服务的电子身份识别和能力查询
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;224:152-7.
9
A Blockchain Framework for Patient-Centered Health Records and Exchange (HealthChain): Evaluation and Proof-of-Concept Study.一种用于以患者为中心的健康记录与交换的区块链框架(HealthChain):评估与概念验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 31;21(8):e13592. doi: 10.2196/13592.
10
IT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey.与实施新的欧洲电子健康解决方案(数字生存护照(SurPass 版本 2.0))相关的信息技术障碍和促进因素:半结构化数字调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 2;26:e49910. doi: 10.2196/49910.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospects for the development of the electronic prescription system in the conditions of the modern pharmaceutical market of Russia.俄罗斯现代药品市场环境下电子处方系统的发展前景
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):1654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11966-1.
2
Legal implications for clinicians in cybersecurity incidents: A review.临床医生在网络安全事件中的法律责任:综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 27;103(39):e39887. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039887.
3
Towards a common European ethical and legal framework for conducting clinical research: the GATEKEEPER experience.
迈向欧洲临床研究的共同伦理与法律框架:守门人项目经验
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Apr 13;7(1):95. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01092-x.
4
The Current State and Usage of European Electronic Cross-border Health Services (eHDSI).欧洲电子跨境卫生服务(eHDSI)的现状和使用情况。
J Med Syst. 2023 Feb 11;47(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01920-9.
5
Standard Document Development for Health Information Exchange in Korea.韩国健康信息交换的标准文件编制。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):592-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749331. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Assessing the Legal Aspects of Information Security Requirements for Health Care in 3 Countries: Scoping Review and Framework Development.评估三个国家医疗保健信息安全要求的法律方面:范围审查与框架制定
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 25;9(2):e30050. doi: 10.2196/30050.
7
Common and Unique Barriers to the Exchange of Administrative Healthcare Data in Environmental Public Health Tracking Program.环境公共卫生跟踪项目中行政医疗保健数据交换的常见与独特障碍
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084356.
8
Integrating data from multiple Finnish biobanks and national health-care registers for retrospective studies: Practical experiences.整合来自多个芬兰生物库和国家健康保健登记处的数据进行回顾性研究:实践经验。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Jun;50(4):482-489. doi: 10.1177/14034948211004421. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
Health Care Cybersecurity Challenges and Solutions Under the Climate of COVID-19: Scoping Review.COVID-19 大流行下的医疗保健网络安全挑战与应对策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e21747. doi: 10.2196/21747.
10
Developing a Transnational Health Record Framework with Level-Specific Interoperability Guidelines Based on a Related Literature Review.基于相关文献综述制定具有特定级别互操作性指南的跨国健康记录框架。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 13;9(1):67. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010067.