• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国健康信息交换的标准文件编制。

Standard Document Development for Health Information Exchange in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Data Science Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):592-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749331. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1749331
PMID:35732191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9217181/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health information exchange (HIE) allows healthcare providers to access a patient's medical information to improve patient care continuity. The standardized data realize the HIE values. Since the Health Level 7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) is flexible, implementation guides (IG) are needed for use cases. Although many CDA IGs have been developed, they did not describe how these CDA IGs were developed. A national CDA IG that meets the local requirements is demanded since the data differs according to the digital divide and social-cultural background of the country that wants to establish HIE. Due to their localized contents, other countries cannot directly adopt the published CDA IGs.

OBJECTIVES

We developed the national CDA IG, namely, Korean (K)-CDA IG that meets the local requirement, including reusable structured templates, value sets, and object identifiers (OIDs). We present a detailed description of the development process and the technical methods of the national CDA IG in the Korean context.

METHODS

The K-CDA IG was developed in the following stages: analysis, development, and evaluation. First, we investigated the health information environment and electronic health record (EHR) systems and conducted a gap analysis with published CDA IGs. Second, a templated CDA approach was taken for designing modular. Lastly, we consulted a technical advisory group for comments on the validity of the K-CDA IG.

RESULTS

A total of 35 CDA templates were developed. We improved 28 value sets of which 13 were Korea specific and 15 were based on the ones used in other IGs, and made a set of rules to establish the OID structure.

CONCLUSION

We presented the development process and the technical specifications of K-CDA IG. We explored how the results can be used as interoperability criteria in the national EHR systems certification program. Finally, we provided recommendations that could guide other entities planning their HIE programs.

摘要

背景

健康信息交换(HIE)允许医疗保健提供者访问患者的医疗信息,以提高患者护理的连续性。标准化数据实现了 HIE 的价值。由于 Health Level 7 Clinical Document Architecture(CDA)具有灵活性,因此需要使用案例的实施指南(IG)。尽管已经开发了许多 CDA IG,但它们没有描述这些 CDA IG 是如何开发的。由于数据因想要建立 HIE 的国家的数字鸿沟和社会文化背景而有所不同,因此需要符合当地要求的国家 CDA IG。由于其本地化内容,其他国家无法直接采用已发布的 CDA IG。

目的

我们开发了符合当地要求的国家 CDA IG,即韩国(K)-CDA IG,其中包括可重复使用的结构化模板、值集和对象标识符(OID)。我们详细介绍了在韩国背景下开发国家 CDA IG 的过程和技术方法。

方法

K-CDA IG 的开发分为以下阶段:分析、开发和评估。首先,我们调查了健康信息环境和电子健康记录(EHR)系统,并与已发布的 CDA IG 进行了差距分析。其次,我们采用模板化的 CDA 方法进行模块化设计。最后,我们咨询了技术咨询小组,以征求他们对 K-CDA IG 有效性的意见。

结果

共开发了 35 个 CDA 模板。我们改进了 28 个值集,其中 13 个是韩国特有的,15 个是基于其他 IG 中的值集,还制定了一套规则来建立 OID 结构。

结论

我们介绍了 K-CDA IG 的开发过程和技术规范。我们探讨了如何将这些结果用作国家 EHR 系统认证计划中的互操作性标准。最后,我们提出了一些建议,可以为其他规划 HIE 计划的实体提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/4551716b0603/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/c31359cd55f5/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/96acb2e486d9/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/76b22cee6159/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/93a537b438fa/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/6f03ddc6cf7f/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/4551716b0603/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/c31359cd55f5/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/96acb2e486d9/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/76b22cee6159/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/93a537b438fa/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/6f03ddc6cf7f/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a34d/9217181/4551716b0603/10-1055-s-0042-1749331-i220009ra-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Standard Document Development for Health Information Exchange in Korea.韩国健康信息交换的标准文件编制。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):592-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749331. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Dual Implementation Guides in FHIR and CDA.FHIR 和 CDA 中的双重实现指南。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Apr 26;313:49-54. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240011.
3
Converting clinical document architecture documents to the common data model for incorporating health information exchange data in observational health studies: CDA to CDM.将临床文档架构文档转换为通用数据模型,以便在观察性健康研究中纳入健康信息交换数据:从临床文档架构(CDA)到通用数据模型(CDM)。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jul;107:103459. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103459. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Data standards for interoperability of care team information to support care coordination of complex pediatric patients.用于支持复杂儿科患者护理协调的护理团队信息互操作性的数据标准。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
5
Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative.符合有意义使用阶段2标准认证的电子健康记录系统是否已做好互操作性准备?来自SMART C-CDA协作项目的研究结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1060-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002883. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
6
A new model for collaboration: building CDA documents in MDHT.一种新的协作模式:在MDHT中构建CDA文档。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:763-9. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
7
Improving the informational continuity of care in diabetes mellitus treatment with a nationwide Shared EHR system: Estimates from Austrian claims data.利用全国共享电子健康记录系统改善糖尿病治疗中的医疗信息连续性:来自奥地利索赔数据的估计
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Aug;92:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 9.
8
Interoperability in the Wild: Comparison of Real-World Electronic C-CDA Documents from Two Sources.真实环境中的互操作性:来自两个来源的真实世界电子 C-CDA 文档的比较。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:43-47. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230924.
9
Development, implementation, and initial evaluation of a foundational open interoperability standard for oncology treatment planning and summarization.开发、实施和初步评估基础开放性肿瘤治疗计划和总结互操作性标准。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May;22(3):577-86. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu015. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Personalized-detailed clinical model for data interoperability among clinical standards.个性化详细临床模型,用于临床标准间的数据互操作性。
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Aug;19(8):632-42. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0189.

本文引用的文献

1
The International Patient Summary Standard and the Extensibility Requirement.国际患者摘要标准与可扩展性要求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Sep 4;273:54-62. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200615.
2
The European cross-border health data exchange roadmap: Case study in the Italian setting.《欧洲跨境卫生数据交换路线图:意大利案例研究》。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103183. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
3
The qualculative dimension of healthcare data interoperability.医疗数据互操作性的定性维度。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):536-548. doi: 10.1177/1460458219833095. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Interoperability Assets for Patient Summary Components: A Gap Analysis.患者摘要组件的互操作性资产:差距分析
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:700-704.
5
Bridging the Gap between HL7 CDA and HL7 FHIR: A JSON Based Mapping.弥合HL7 CDA与HL7 FHIR之间的差距:基于JSON的映射
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;223:100-6.
6
Developing a common health information exchange platform to implement a nationwide health information network in South Korea.在韩国开发一个通用的健康信息交换平台,以实现全国性的健康信息网络。
Healthc Inform Res. 2015 Jan;21(1):21-9. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.1.21. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
7
XDS-I outsourcing proxy: ensuring confidentiality while preserving interoperability.XDS-I 外包代理:在确保互操作性的同时保护机密性。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014 Jul;18(4):1404-12. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2013.2292776.
8
Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative.符合有意义使用阶段2标准认证的电子健康记录系统是否已做好互操作性准备?来自SMART C-CDA协作项目的研究结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1060-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002883. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
Clinical Document Architecture integration system to support patient referral and reply letters.
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):160-70. doi: 10.1177/1460458214537510. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
10
A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.澳大利亚的个人化电子健康记录。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):707-13. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002068. Epub 2014 Mar 20.