Suppr超能文献

“我不知道”我的癌症风险:对健康行为参与的影响。

"I don't know" My Cancer Risk: Implications for Health Behavior Engagement.

作者信息

Waters Erika A, Kiviniemi Marc T, Orom Heather, Hay Jennifer L

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8100, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):784-788. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9789-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people report uncertainty about their cancer risk. We examined whether such uncertainty was related to cancer prevention and detection behaviors.

METHODS

National Health Interview Survey data from 2005 to 2010 were analyzed. Participants reported their perceived risk for colorectal and breast cancers. Responses were coded as "valid" (i.e., less/as/more likely than average) or "don't know."

RESULTS

In bivariate analyses for both cancer sites and survey years, "don't know" responders (DKR) engaged in less physical activity than "valid" responders (p < 0.05). DKR had lower mammography adherence than "valid" responders in 2005 and lower colorectal screening adherence in 2010 (p < 0.05). DKR had marginally lower colorectal screening adherence and fruit/vegetable consumption in 2005 (p < 0.06). Multivariable models indicated that the DKR-behavior relationship could be largely accounted for by education.

CONCLUSION

Interventions that help people understand their cancer risk may provide particular benefit to people with low education and might consequently reduce health disparities.

摘要

背景

许多人表示对自身患癌风险存在不确定性。我们研究了这种不确定性是否与癌症预防和筛查行为有关。

方法

分析了2005年至2010年的国家健康访谈调查数据。参与者报告了他们对结直肠癌和乳腺癌的感知风险。回答被编码为“有效”(即低于/等于/高于平均水平)或“不知道”。

结果

在针对癌症部位和调查年份的双变量分析中,“不知道”的回答者(DKR)比“有效”回答者进行的体育活动更少(p < 0.05)。2005年,DKR的乳房X光检查依从性低于“有效”回答者,2010年其结直肠癌筛查依从性更低(p < 0.05)。2005年,DKR的结直肠癌筛查依从性和水果/蔬菜摄入量略低(p < 0.06)。多变量模型表明,DKR与行为之间的关系在很大程度上可由教育来解释。

结论

帮助人们了解自身癌症风险的干预措施可能对低教育水平人群特别有益,从而可能减少健康差距。

相似文献

9
Measuring risk perceptions: what does the excessive use of 50% mean?衡量风险认知:过度使用 50%意味着什么?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):232-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11404077. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

6
Revisiting Candidacy: What Might It Offer Cancer Prevention?重新审视癌症候选人:它能为癌症预防带来什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;18(19):10157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910157.

本文引用的文献

8
Applying what we know to accelerate cancer prevention.应用我们所知来加速癌症预防。
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Mar 28;4(127):127rv4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003218.
9
Measuring risk perceptions: what does the excessive use of 50% mean?衡量风险认知:过度使用 50%意味着什么?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):232-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11404077. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验