Berlingeri Manuela, Magnani Francesca Giulia, Salvato Gerardo, Rosanova Mario, Bottini Gabriella
Department of Humanistic Studies (DISTUM), University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, Italy.
Center of Clinical Developmental Neuropsychology, ASUR Marche, Area Vasta 1 Pesaro, 61122 Pesaro, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 16;8(4):516. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040516.
Neuroimaging tools could open a window on residual neurofunctional activity in the absence of detectable behavioural responses in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Nevertheless, the literature on this topic is characterised by a large heterogeneity of paradigms and methodological approaches that can undermine the reproducibility of the results. To explicitly test whether task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be used to systematically detect neurofunctional differences between different classes of DOC, and whether these differences are related with a specific category of cognitive tasks (either active or passive), we meta-analyzed 22 neuroimaging studies published between 2005 and 2017 using the Activation Likelihood Estimate method. The results showed that: (1) active and passive tasks rely on well-segregated patterns of activations; (2) both unresponsive wakeful syndrome and patients in minimally conscious state activated a large portion of the dorsal-attentional network; (3) shared activations between patients fell mainly in the passive activation map (7492 voxels), while only 48 voxels fell in a subcortical region of the active-map. Our results suggest that DOCs can be described along a continuum-rather than as separated clinical categories-and characterised by a widespread dysfunction of brain networks rather than by the impairment of a well functionally anatomically defined one.
神经成像工具可以为意识障碍(DOC)患者在没有可检测到的行为反应时的残余神经功能活动打开一扇窗。然而,关于这一主题的文献的特点是范式和方法途径存在很大的异质性,这可能会破坏结果的可重复性。为了明确测试与任务相关的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)是否可用于系统地检测不同类别DOC之间的神经功能差异,以及这些差异是否与特定类别的认知任务(主动或被动)相关,我们使用激活似然估计方法对2005年至2017年间发表的22项神经成像研究进行了荟萃分析。结果表明:(1)主动和被动任务依赖于激活的良好分离模式;(2)无反应觉醒综合征患者和最低意识状态患者均激活了大部分背侧注意网络;(3)患者之间的共享激活主要落在被动激活图中(7492个体素),而只有48个体素落在主动图的皮质下区域。我们的结果表明,DOC可以沿着一个连续体来描述,而不是作为分开的临床类别,其特征是脑网络广泛功能障碍,而不是功能解剖学上明确界定的一个区域受损。