• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依普利酮治疗活动期、未经治疗超过 4 个月的慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(VICI)患者:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2020 Jan 25;395(10220):294-303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32981-2.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32981-2
PMID:31982075
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), fluid accumulates in the subretinal space. CSCR is a common visually disabling condition that develops in individuals up to 60 years of age, and there is no definitive treatment. Previous research suggests the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, is effective for treating CSCR; however, this drug is not licensed for the treatment of patients with CSCR. We aimed to evaluate whether eplerenone was superior to placebo in terms of improving visual acuity in patients with chronic CSCR.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre placebo-controlled trial was done at 22 hospitals in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18-60 years and had had treatment-naive CSCR for 4 months or more. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the eplerenone or the placebo group by a trial statistician through a password-protected system online. Allocation was stratified by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and hospital. Patients were given either oral eplerenone (25 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 50 mg/day for up to 12 months) plus usual care or placebo plus usual care for up to 12 months. All participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was BCVA, measured as letters read, at 12 months. All outcomes apart from safety were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis (participants who withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement were excluded from the primary analysis population and from most secondary analysis populations). The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN92746680, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 11, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 114 patients to receive either eplerenone (n=57) or placebo (n=57). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement and were excluded from the primary outcome analysis population. All patients from the eplerenone group and 54 patients from the placebo group were included in the primary outcome. Modelled mean BCVA at 12 months was 79·5 letters (SD 4·5) in the placebo group and 80·4 letters (4·6) in the eplerenone group, with an adjusted estimated mean difference of 1·73 letters (95% CI -1·12 to 4·57; p=0·24) at 12 months. Hyperkalaemia occurred in eight (14%) patients in each group. No serious adverse events were reported in the eplerenone group and three unrelated serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction [anticipated], diverticulitis [unanticipated], and metabolic surgery [unanticipated]).

INTERPRETATION

Eplerenone was not superior to placebo for improving BCVA in people with chronic CSCR after 12 months of treatment. Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for CSCR should discontinue this practice.

FUNDING

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and National Institute for Health Research and Social Care.

摘要

背景

在慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)中,液体会积聚在视网膜下空间。CSCR 是一种常见的致盲性疾病,发生在 60 岁以下的人群中,目前尚无明确的治疗方法。先前的研究表明,盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂依普利酮对治疗 CSCR 有效;然而,这种药物尚未获得批准用于治疗 CSCR 患者。我们旨在评估依普利酮是否在提高慢性 CSCR 患者的视力方面优于安慰剂。

方法

这项随机、双盲、平行组、多中心安慰剂对照试验在英国的 22 家医院进行。如果患者年龄在 18-60 岁之间,且未经治疗的 CSCR 已持续 4 个月或以上,则有资格参加。通过密码保护的在线系统,由试验统计学家以 1:1 的比例将患者随机分配到依普利酮组或安慰剂组。所有患者均接受依普利酮(每天 25 毫克,持续 1 周,然后增加至每天 50 毫克,持续 12 个月)加常规治疗或安慰剂加常规治疗,持续 12 个月。所有参与者、护理团队、结果评估者、药剂师和试验管理小组的成员均对治疗分配进行了盲法处理。主要结局是 12 个月时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA),以阅读的字母数表示。除安全性外,所有结局均采用改良意向治疗进行分析(未提交随机后 BCVA 测量结果且未退出的参与者从主要分析人群中排除,并从大多数次要分析人群中排除)。该试验在 ISRCTN、ISRCTN92746680 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,并已完成。

结果

2017 年 1 月 11 日至 2018 年 2 月 22 日期间,我们招募并随机分配了 114 名患者,分别接受依普利酮(n=57)或安慰剂(n=57)治疗。安慰剂组中有 3 名患者在未提交随机后 BCVA 测量结果且未退出的情况下撤回了同意,因此从主要结局分析人群中排除。依普利酮组的所有患者和安慰剂组的 54 名患者均纳入主要结局。模型预测,12 个月时安慰剂组的 BCVA 为 79.5 个字母(SD 4.5),依普利酮组为 80.4 个字母(4.6),调整后的估计平均差异为 1.73 个字母(95%CI -1.12 至 4.57;p=0.24)。两组各有 8(14%)名患者出现高钾血症。依普利酮组未报告严重不良事件,安慰剂组报告了 3 例无关的严重不良事件(心肌梗死[预期]、憩室炎[意外]和代谢手术[意外])。

解释

依普利酮治疗 12 个月后,在提高慢性 CSCR 患者的 BCVA 方面并不优于安慰剂。目前为 CSCR 开具依普利酮的眼科医生应停止这种做法。

结论

依普利酮治疗慢性 CSCR 患者 12 个月后,并未提高患者的视力。目前为 CSCR 开具依普利酮的眼科医生应停止这种做法。

资金

疗效和机制评估计划,以及英国国家卫生研究院和社会保健署。

相似文献

1
Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.依普利酮治疗活动期、未经治疗超过 4 个月的慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(VICI)患者:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 25;395(10220):294-303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32981-2.
2
3
Clinical efficacy of eplerenone versus placebo for central serous chorioretinopathy: study protocol for the VICI randomised controlled trial.依普利酮对比安慰剂治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的临床疗效:VICI 随机对照试验研究方案。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Feb;33(2):295-303. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0212-2. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
4
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Feb;3(2):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
5
Should We Stop Treating Patients With Eplerenone for Chronic CSCR? Commentary on the VICI Trial.我们是否应该停止用依普利酮治疗慢性 CSCR 患者?对 VICI 试验的评论。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021 Jun;52(6):308-310. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20210528-02. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy-a randomized controlled prospective study.依普利酮治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变——一项随机对照前瞻性研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;95(7):e610-e618. doi: 10.1111/aos.13491. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
7
Comparison of two mineralcorticosteroids receptor antagonists for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy.两种盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;37(5):1115-1125. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0377-2. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
8
Oral Mineralocorticoid-Receptor Antagonists: Choroidal Parameters Changes Using OCT in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.口服盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂:中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变中使用光学相干断层扫描观察脉络膜参数变化
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 Nov 1;50(11):726-733. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20191031-08.
9
A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROL PILOT STUDY OF EPLERENONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY (ECSELSIOR).依普利酮治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(ECSelsior)的随机双盲安慰剂对照初步研究。
Retina. 2018 May;38(5):962-969. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001649.
10
Predictors of Outcome During Eplerenone Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy:A Prospective, Open-Label Pilot Clinical Study.依普利酮治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的预后预测因素:一项前瞻性、开放标签的试点临床研究。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Jul 1;49(7):479-486. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180628-03.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy: new options for an old disease.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的治疗:一种古老疾病的新选择
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jul 4. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03894-z.
2
Influence of combined eplerenone, aflibercept and nepafenac therapy on central serous chorioretinopathy.依普利酮、阿柏西普和奈帕芬胺联合治疗对中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的影响。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 18;18(6):1064-1070. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.06.12. eCollection 2025.
3
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.
中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
4
Evaluating Photodynamic Therapy vs. Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Retrospective Study.评估光动力疗法与阈下微脉冲激光治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变:一项回顾性研究。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Apr;242(4):405-412. doi: 10.1055/a-2542-4969. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
5
Clinical outcome of eplerenone in the management of acute central serous chorioretinopathy.依普利酮治疗急性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的临床疗效
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 25;18(1):9-15. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_118_23. eCollection 2025 Jan-Apr.
6
Therapeutic interventions for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a comprehensive assessment of systematic reviews.慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的治疗干预措施:系统评价的综合评估
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Mar 23;11(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00660-x.
7
Sleep and mood in central serous chorioretinopathy.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变中的睡眠与情绪
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1615-1623. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03688-3. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
8
[Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy in comparison-Micropulse laser versus photodynamic therapy].[中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的治疗比较——微脉冲激光与光动力疗法]
Ophthalmologie. 2025 Mar;122(3):186-195. doi: 10.1007/s00347-025-02183-0. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
9
[Stress and other risk factors in central serous chorioretinopathy-A myth?].[中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变中的压力及其他风险因素——一种误解?]
Ophthalmologie. 2025 Mar;122(3):162-169. doi: 10.1007/s00347-024-02179-2. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
10
The safe lowest effective power of subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in Chinese patients with acute or chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.阈下微脉冲激光治疗中国急性或慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变患者的安全最低有效功率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 6;11:1494402. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1494402. eCollection 2024.