Suppr超能文献

依普利酮治疗活动期、未经治疗超过 4 个月的慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(VICI)患者:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2020 Jan 25;395(10220):294-303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32981-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), fluid accumulates in the subretinal space. CSCR is a common visually disabling condition that develops in individuals up to 60 years of age, and there is no definitive treatment. Previous research suggests the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, is effective for treating CSCR; however, this drug is not licensed for the treatment of patients with CSCR. We aimed to evaluate whether eplerenone was superior to placebo in terms of improving visual acuity in patients with chronic CSCR.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre placebo-controlled trial was done at 22 hospitals in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18-60 years and had had treatment-naive CSCR for 4 months or more. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the eplerenone or the placebo group by a trial statistician through a password-protected system online. Allocation was stratified by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and hospital. Patients were given either oral eplerenone (25 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 50 mg/day for up to 12 months) plus usual care or placebo plus usual care for up to 12 months. All participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was BCVA, measured as letters read, at 12 months. All outcomes apart from safety were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis (participants who withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement were excluded from the primary analysis population and from most secondary analysis populations). The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN92746680, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 11, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 114 patients to receive either eplerenone (n=57) or placebo (n=57). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement and were excluded from the primary outcome analysis population. All patients from the eplerenone group and 54 patients from the placebo group were included in the primary outcome. Modelled mean BCVA at 12 months was 79·5 letters (SD 4·5) in the placebo group and 80·4 letters (4·6) in the eplerenone group, with an adjusted estimated mean difference of 1·73 letters (95% CI -1·12 to 4·57; p=0·24) at 12 months. Hyperkalaemia occurred in eight (14%) patients in each group. No serious adverse events were reported in the eplerenone group and three unrelated serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction [anticipated], diverticulitis [unanticipated], and metabolic surgery [unanticipated]).

INTERPRETATION

Eplerenone was not superior to placebo for improving BCVA in people with chronic CSCR after 12 months of treatment. Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for CSCR should discontinue this practice.

FUNDING

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and National Institute for Health Research and Social Care.

摘要

背景

在慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)中,液体会积聚在视网膜下空间。CSCR 是一种常见的致盲性疾病,发生在 60 岁以下的人群中,目前尚无明确的治疗方法。先前的研究表明,盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂依普利酮对治疗 CSCR 有效;然而,这种药物尚未获得批准用于治疗 CSCR 患者。我们旨在评估依普利酮是否在提高慢性 CSCR 患者的视力方面优于安慰剂。

方法

这项随机、双盲、平行组、多中心安慰剂对照试验在英国的 22 家医院进行。如果患者年龄在 18-60 岁之间,且未经治疗的 CSCR 已持续 4 个月或以上,则有资格参加。通过密码保护的在线系统,由试验统计学家以 1:1 的比例将患者随机分配到依普利酮组或安慰剂组。所有患者均接受依普利酮(每天 25 毫克,持续 1 周,然后增加至每天 50 毫克,持续 12 个月)加常规治疗或安慰剂加常规治疗,持续 12 个月。所有参与者、护理团队、结果评估者、药剂师和试验管理小组的成员均对治疗分配进行了盲法处理。主要结局是 12 个月时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA),以阅读的字母数表示。除安全性外,所有结局均采用改良意向治疗进行分析(未提交随机后 BCVA 测量结果且未退出的参与者从主要分析人群中排除,并从大多数次要分析人群中排除)。该试验在 ISRCTN、ISRCTN92746680 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,并已完成。

结果

2017 年 1 月 11 日至 2018 年 2 月 22 日期间,我们招募并随机分配了 114 名患者,分别接受依普利酮(n=57)或安慰剂(n=57)治疗。安慰剂组中有 3 名患者在未提交随机后 BCVA 测量结果且未退出的情况下撤回了同意,因此从主要结局分析人群中排除。依普利酮组的所有患者和安慰剂组的 54 名患者均纳入主要结局。模型预测,12 个月时安慰剂组的 BCVA 为 79.5 个字母(SD 4.5),依普利酮组为 80.4 个字母(4.6),调整后的估计平均差异为 1.73 个字母(95%CI -1.12 至 4.57;p=0.24)。两组各有 8(14%)名患者出现高钾血症。依普利酮组未报告严重不良事件,安慰剂组报告了 3 例无关的严重不良事件(心肌梗死[预期]、憩室炎[意外]和代谢手术[意外])。

解释

依普利酮治疗 12 个月后,在提高慢性 CSCR 患者的 BCVA 方面并不优于安慰剂。目前为 CSCR 开具依普利酮的眼科医生应停止这种做法。

结论

依普利酮治疗慢性 CSCR 患者 12 个月后,并未提高患者的视力。目前为 CSCR 开具依普利酮的眼科医生应停止这种做法。

资金

疗效和机制评估计划,以及英国国家卫生研究院和社会保健署。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验