Suppr超能文献

他汀类药物用于心血管疾病一级预防的系统评价概述。

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews.

机构信息

J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):e023085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023085.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise evidence from exclusively primary prevention data on the effectiveness of statins for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including stroke, and outcomes stratified by baseline risk and gender.

DESIGN

Overview of systematic reviews (SRs) using Revised-AMSTAR approach to assess quality.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and PROSPERO to June 2017.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

SRs of randomised control trials (RCTs) or individual patient data (IPD) from RCTs, examining the effectiveness of statins versus placebo or no treatment on all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease, CVD (including stroke) and composite endpoints, with stratification by baseline risk and gender.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

RESULTS

Three SRs were included. Quality of included SRs was mixed, and none reported on the risk of bias of included trials.We found trends towards reduced all-cause mortality in all SRs (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.85 to 0.97]), (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.01]) and (RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.53 to 1.15]) though it was not statistically significant in two SRs. When stratified by baseline risk, the effect on all-cause mortality was no longer statistically significant except in one medium risk category. One review reported significant reductions (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.77 to 0.95]) in vascular deaths and non-significant reductions in non-vascular deaths (RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.88 to 1.07]). There were significant reductions in composite outcomes overall, but mixed results were reported in these when stratified by baseline risk. These reviews included studies with participants considered risk equivalent to those with established CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of statins for primary prevention with mixed findings from studies including participants with widely ranging baseline risks. Decision making for the use of statins should consider individual baseline risk, absolute risk reduction and whether risk reduction justifies potential harms and taking a daily medicine for life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017064761.

摘要

目的

综合仅来自一级预防数据的他汀类药物预防心血管疾病(CVD),包括中风,以及按基线风险和性别分层的结果的证据。

设计

使用修订后的 AMSTAR 方法评估质量的系统评价概述。

数据来源

Cochrane 系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 PROSPERO 至 2017 年 6 月。

研究选择标准

随机对照试验(RCT)或来自 RCT 的个体患者数据(IPD)的系统评价,检查他汀类药物与安慰剂或无治疗相比在全因死亡率、冠心病、CVD(包括中风)和复合终点方面的有效性,按基线风险和性别分层。

数据提取和综合

两名独立评审员提取数据并评估方法学质量。进行了叙述性综合。

结果

纳入了三项系统评价。纳入的系统评价质量参差不齐,没有一项报告纳入试验的偏倚风险。我们发现所有系统评价都有降低全因死亡率的趋势(RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.85 至 0.97]),(RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.83 至 1.01])和(RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.53 至 1.15]),尽管在两项系统评价中这并不具有统计学意义。按基线风险分层后,除了一个中危类别外,全因死亡率的影响不再具有统计学意义。一项综述报告血管死亡显著减少(RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.77 至 0.95]),非血管死亡无显著减少(RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.88 至 1.07])。总体上复合结果有显著减少,但按基线风险分层报告的结果不一致。这些综述包括参与者被认为与已确诊 CVD 风险相当的研究。

结论

对于一级预防,他汀类药物的有效性证据有限,来自包括基线风险差异较大的参与者的研究结果不一致。他汀类药物的使用决策应考虑个体的基线风险、绝对风险降低以及风险降低是否证明潜在危害和终身服用每日药物是合理的。

试验注册号

CRD42017064761。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/670b/6500096/757f55a91bb0/bmjopen-2018-023085f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验