Cyna A M, Przyslo F R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Feb 14;294(6569):416-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6569.416.
Vocational trainees in the West Midlands who were in their general practice year were sent a postal questionnaire to find out whether there were important differences between the criteria for training of the 1986 West Midland postgraduate education committee (based on national recommendations) and the perceptions of the trainees of their current trainers and practices. The response rate was 86.2% (75 out of 87). Sixty four per cent (48) of trainees reported that they received on average less than the recommended minimum of three hours of teaching time a week. They felt that experience was inadequate in paediatric surveillance (62.7%) and preventive medical care (37.3%). Most trainers gave topic teaching (90.7%), and few used role play (5%). Most of the trainees (52%) had not signed a contract, a third did not get help with recommended allowances, and 37% thought that their progress had not been reviewed. Several trainees commented on the excellence of their training practices, and most of the practices appeared to be keeping to the spirit of the recommendations. There are, however, discrepancies between what some trainees feel they receive and what is recommended.
西米德兰兹郡正在进行全科实习年的职业培训学员收到了一份邮寄问卷，以了解1986年西米德兰兹郡研究生教育委员会的培训标准（基于国家建议）与学员对其当前培训师和实习情况的看法之间是否存在重大差异。回复率为86.2%（87人中75人回复）。64%（48人）的学员报告称，他们平均每周接受的教学时间少于建议的最低每周三小时。他们觉得在儿科监测（62.7%）和预防医疗保健（37.3%）方面经验不足。大多数培训师进行专题教学（90.7%），很少有人使用角色扮演（5%）。大多数实习生（52%）没有签订合同，三分之一的人没有得到关于推荐津贴的帮助，37%的人认为他们的进展没有得到评估。一些学员对他们的培训实习情况表示赞赏，大多数实习似乎都遵循了建议的精神。然而，一些学员认为他们所得到的与所建议的之间存在差异。
