Suppr超能文献

产科护理中的角色、风险和责任:实习生的观念及产科实习培训的影响

Roles, risks, and responsibilities in maternity care: trainees' beliefs and the effects of practice obstetric training.

作者信息

Smith L F

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, University of Bristol.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Jun 20;304(6842):1613-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6842.1613.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To document the content of practice obstetric vocational training, the beliefs of general practitioner trainees about the roles of midwives and general practitioners in maternity care, and the risks of providing such care; and to ascertain if undergoing such training affects their beliefs.

DESIGN

Confidential postal questionnaire survey.

SUBJECTS

Random one in four sample of all general practitioner trainees in the United Kingdom on vocational training schemes or in training practices in autumn 1990.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Beliefs scored on seven point Likert scales and characteristics of trainer and training practice.

RESULTS

Of 1019 trainees sent questionnaires, 765 (75.1% response rate) replied; 638 (83.3%) had done some part of their practice year. Of their trainers, 224 (35.1%) provided full obstetric care. 749 (99%) and 364 (48%) trainees believed that midwives and general practitioners respectively have an important role in normal labour; 681 (91.7%) trainees believed that general practice intrapartum care is a high risk "specialty." Those trainees whose trainers provide full obstetric care were significantly more likely to believe that both midwives and general practitioners have an important role in abnormal labour and to see the provision of intrapartum care as an incentive to join a practice.

CONCLUSION

In this series most general practitioner trainees believed that both midwives and general practitioners have important roles in maternity care. Exposure of trainees to the provision of full obstetric care while in their training practice resulted in a more positive attitude towards the provision of such care by general practitioners.

摘要

目的

记录产科实践职业培训的内容、全科医生培训生对助产士和全科医生在孕产妇护理中角色的看法以及提供此类护理的风险;并确定接受此类培训是否会影响他们的看法。

设计

保密邮寄问卷调查。

研究对象

从1990年秋季参加职业培训计划或培训实习的英国所有全科医生培训生中随机抽取四分之一作为样本。

主要观察指标

用七点李克特量表评分得出的看法以及培训师和培训实习的特点。

结果

在1019名收到问卷的培训生中,765人(回复率75.1%)进行了回复;638人(83.3%)完成了部分实习年。在他们的培训师中,224人(35.1%)提供全面的产科护理。749名(99%)和364名(48%)培训生分别认为助产士和全科医生在正常分娩中发挥重要作用;681名(91.7%)培训生认为全科医生的产时护理是高风险“专业”。那些培训师提供全面产科护理的培训生更有可能认为助产士和全科医生在异常分娩中都发挥重要作用,并将提供产时护理视为加入某一实习的诱因。

结论

在本研究系列中,大多数全科医生培训生认为助产士和全科医生在孕产妇护理中都发挥重要作用。培训生在培训实习期间接触到全面的产科护理,会使其对全科医生提供此类护理持更积极的态度。

相似文献

9
Audit: trainers' and trainees' attitudes and experiences.审核:培训师与学员的态度及经历
Med Educ. 1995 Jan;29(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02807.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity of care.连续护理。
J Fam Pract. 1982 Nov;15(5):847-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验