Baker M, Sprackling P D
University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 1994 Mar;70(821):198-202. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.70.821.198.
The aims of this study were to elicit general practitioner (GP) trainee's perceptions of the educational structure of their hospital posts, to compare them with those of consultants who had GP trainees as senior house officers (SHOs) in their departments and to examine the use of educational objectives in the hospital component of vocational training for general practice. A confidential postal questionnaire was sent to all the GP trainees (165 doctors) in the hospital component of their vocational training schemes (VTS) for general practice in Trent Region and all the consultants (161 doctors) in Trent who had GP trainees in their SHO posts on that date. Responses were received from 136 trainees (82%) and 134 consultants (83%). Educational objectives were stated as existing in the SHO post by 31 trainees (23%) and by 62 consultants (46%). Of those doctors who said that objectives existed, 19 of the trainees (61%) and 40 of the consultants (65%) said that the objectives were useful. Only nine (29%) of the trainees who stated that educational objectives existed felt that they were being put into practice by senior staff, compared with 41 (66%) of consultants who had made that statement. Of all respondents, 113 trainees (87%) and 100 consultants (77%) agreed or strongly agreed that the use of educational objectives would be beneficial to the trainees. Only 10 (7%) of trainees said that they received no teaching in their current posts. Forty trainees (32%) and 88 consultants (67%) said that teaching took place in protected time. Both groups cited consultants as the member of staff giving the most teaching. Ninety-six consultants (73%) replied that it was possible for GP trainees to obtain study leave, but 102 trainees (75%) either had experienced difficulties in obtaining study leave or had not attempted to obtain study leave. Trainees and consultants differed appreciably in their perceptions of the amount of assessment and feedback which was provided for GP trainees. The use of educational objectives in the hospital component of vocational training was felt to be beneficial by both consultants and GP trainees. Consultants were more likely than trainees to report the use of educational objectives, protected teaching time, GP-orientated teaching, ability of trainees to attend VTS half-day release and the provision of assessment and feedback to trainees.
本研究的目的是了解全科医生(GP)培训生对其医院岗位教育结构的看法,将他们的看法与那些在其科室中有GP培训生担任高级住院医师(SHO)的顾问的看法进行比较,并研究在全科医学职业培训的医院部分中教育目标的使用情况。向特伦特地区全科医学职业培训计划(VTS)医院部分的所有GP培训生(165名医生)以及当时在特伦特地区其SHO岗位上有GP培训生的所有顾问(161名医生)发送了一份保密的邮政调查问卷。收到了136名培训生(82%)和134名顾问(83%)的回复。31名培训生(23%)和62名顾问(46%)表示SHO岗位存在教育目标。在那些表示存在目标的医生中,19名培训生(61%)和40名顾问(65%)表示这些目标是有用的。在表示存在教育目标的培训生中,只有9名(29%)觉得高级 staff 将目标付诸实践,相比之下,做出此表述的顾问有41名(66%)。在所有受访者中,113名培训生(87%)和100名顾问(77%)同意或强烈同意使用教育目标对培训生有益。只有10名(7%)培训生表示他们在当前岗位没有接受任何教学。40名培训生(32%)和88名顾问(67%)表示教学在受保护的时间进行。两组都提到顾问是授课最多的 staff 成员。96名顾问(73%)回复说GP培训生有可能获得学习假,但102名培训生(75%)要么在获得学习假方面遇到困难,要么没有尝试获得学习假。培训生和顾问对为GP培训生提供的评估和反馈量的看法存在明显差异。顾问和GP培训生都认为在职业培训的医院部分使用教育目标是有益的。顾问比培训生更有可能报告使用教育目标、受保护的教学时间、以GP为导向的教学、培训生参加VTS半天脱产学习的能力以及向培训生提供评估和反馈的情况。