• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种适用于多种反应风格的通用展开IRT模型。

A General Unfolding IRT Model for Multiple Response Styles.

作者信息

Liu Chen-Wei, Wang Wen-Chung

机构信息

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 May;43(3):195-210. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762743. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1177/0146621618762743
PMID:31019356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6463344/
Abstract

It is commonly known that respondents exhibit different response styles when responding to Likert-type items. For example, some respondents tend to select the extreme categories (e.g., strongly disagree and strongly agree), whereas some tend to select the middle categories (e.g., disagree, neutral, and agree). Furthermore, some respondents tend to disagree with every item (e.g., strongly disagree and disagree), whereas others tend to agree with every item (e.g., agree and strongly agree). In such cases, fitting standard unfolding item response theory (IRT) models that assume no response style will yield a poor fit and biased parameter estimates. Although there have been attempts to develop dominance IRT models to accommodate the various response styles, such models are usually restricted to a specific response style and cannot be used for unfolding data. In this study, a general unfolding IRT model is proposed that can be combined with a softmax function to accommodate various response styles via scoring functions. The parameters of the new model can be estimated using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. An empirical data set is used for demonstration purposes, followed by simulation studies to assess the parameter recovery of the new model, as well as the consequences of ignoring the impact of response styles on parameter estimators by fitting standard unfolding IRT models. The results suggest the new model to exhibit good parameter recovery and seriously biased estimates when the response styles are ignored.

摘要

众所周知,在回答李克特式项目时,受访者会表现出不同的回答方式。例如,一些受访者倾向于选择极端类别(如强烈不同意和强烈同意),而一些受访者则倾向于选择中间类别(如不同意、中立和同意)。此外,一些受访者倾向于对每个项目都持否定态度(如强烈不同意和不同意),而另一些受访者则倾向于对每个项目都持肯定态度(如同意和强烈同意)。在这种情况下,拟合假设不存在回答方式的标准展开项目反应理论(IRT)模型将导致拟合效果不佳和参数估计有偏差。尽管已经有人尝试开发优势IRT模型来适应各种回答方式,但这类模型通常局限于特定的回答方式,不能用于展开数据。在本研究中,提出了一种通用的展开IRT模型,该模型可以与softmax函数相结合,通过评分函数来适应各种回答方式。新模型的参数可以使用贝叶斯马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法进行估计。使用一个实证数据集进行演示,随后进行模拟研究,以评估新模型的参数恢复情况,以及通过拟合标准展开IRT模型而忽略回答方式对参数估计量的影响所产生的后果。结果表明,当忽略回答方式时,新模型表现出良好的参数恢复能力,但估计值存在严重偏差。

相似文献

1
A General Unfolding IRT Model for Multiple Response Styles.一种适用于多种反应风格的通用展开IRT模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 May;43(3):195-210. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762743. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Unfolding IRT Models for Likert-Type Items With a Don't Know Option.具有“不知道”选项的李克特式项目的展开IRT模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;40(7):517-533. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664047. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Accounting for Unfolding Item Response Process and Response Styles Using Unfolding Item Response Tree Models.一石二鸟:使用展开式项目反应树模型考量展开式项目反应过程及反应风格
Multivariate Behav Res. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):161-183. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2394607. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
4
Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.应用混合多分类项目反应模型的样本量要求:蒙特卡罗模拟研究结果
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 13;10:2494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02494. eCollection 2019.
5
Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.用于控制量表极端反应风格的混合随机效应项目反应理论模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 2;7:1706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01706. eCollection 2016.
6
Confirmatory Multidimensional IRT Unfolding Models for Graded-Response Items.用于等级反应项目的验证性多维IRT展开模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jan;40(1):56-72. doi: 10.1177/0146621615602855. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
7
Using IRTree Models to Promote Selection Validity in the Presence of Extreme Response Styles.使用IRTree模型在存在极端反应风格的情况下提高选择效度。
J Intell. 2023 Nov 17;11(11):216. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110216.
8
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.具有不同项目反应结构的通用混合项目反应模型:应用于李克特量表的阐述。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2325-2344. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0997-0.
9
Validity of Three IRT Models for Measuring and Controlling Extreme and Midpoint Response Styles.三种用于测量和控制极端与中点反应风格的项目反应理论模型的效度
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;11:271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00271. eCollection 2020.
10
Do Response Styles Affect Estimates of Growth on Social-Emotional Constructs? Evidence from Four Years of Longitudinal Survey Scores.应对风格是否会影响社会情感结构增长的估计?来自四年纵向调查分数的证据。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Nov-Dec;56(6):853-873. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1778440. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dominant Trait Profile Method of Scoring Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires.多维迫选问卷评分的显性特质剖析法
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Aug 14:00131644251360386. doi: 10.1177/00131644251360386.
2
Exploring the Influence of Response Styles on Continuous Scale Assessments: Insights From a Novel Modeling Approach.探索反应方式对连续量表评估的影响:来自一种新型建模方法的见解。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Feb;85(1):178-214. doi: 10.1177/00131644241242789. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
Investigating Directional Invariance in an Item Response Tree Model for Extreme Response Style and Trait-Based Unfolding Responses.探究极端反应风格和基于特质的展开式反应的项目反应树模型中的方向不变性。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Jul;48(4-5):187-207. doi: 10.1177/01466216241261705. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Co-occurring dominance and ideal point processes: A general IRTree framework for multidimensional item responding.共现优势与理想点过程:多维项目反应的一般 IRTree 框架。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7005-7025. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02405-4. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Multidimensional item response theory models for testlet-based doubly bounded data.基于测试单元的双重边界数据的多维项目反应理论模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5309-5353. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02272-5. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
6
The Effects of Aberrant Responding on Model-Fit Assuming Different Underlying Response Processes.假设不同潜在反应过程时异常反应对模型拟合的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Sep;47(5-6):420-437. doi: 10.1177/01466216231201987. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.使用项目反应树测量跨结构的反应风格稳定性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):281-306. doi: 10.1177/00131644211020103. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
From Knowledge Transmission to Knowledge Construction: A Step towards Human-Like Active Learning.从知识传授到知识构建:迈向类人主动学习的一步。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Aug 18;22(8):906. doi: 10.3390/e22080906.
9
Estimation of Response Styles Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model: A Tutorial and Comparison With Sum Scores.使用多维名义反应模型估计反应风格:教程及与总分的比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 6;11:72. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00072. eCollection 2020.
10
Fitting item response unfolding models to Likert-scale data using mirt in R.使用 R 中的 mirt 拟合李克特量表数据的项目反应展开模型。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196292. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Rubric-Related Multidimensionality in Polytomously Scored Test Items.探索多值计分测试项目中与评分标准相关的多维性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):163-177. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677715. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
2
Unfolding IRT Models for Likert-Type Items With a Don't Know Option.具有“不知道”选项的李克特式项目的展开IRT模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;40(7):517-533. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664047. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Confirmatory Multidimensional IRT Unfolding Models for Graded-Response Items.用于等级反应项目的验证性多维IRT展开模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jan;40(1):56-72. doi: 10.1177/0146621615602855. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Measuring response styles in Likert items.测量李克特项目中的反应风格。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):69-83. doi: 10.1037/met0000106. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
5
Item response theory scoring and the detection of curvilinear relationships.项目反应理论评分与曲线关系的检测。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):191-203. doi: 10.1037/met0000101. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
6
A flexible full-information approach to the modeling of response styles.一种灵活的全信息方法来建模反应风格。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):328-47. doi: 10.1037/met0000059. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments.一种用于心理评估的广义项目反应树模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1070-85. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0631-y.
8
Constrained Dual Scaling for Detecting Response Styles in Categorical Data.用于检测分类数据中反应风格的约束对偶标度法
Psychometrika. 2015 Dec;80(4):968-94. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9458-9. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Improving measurement precision of test batteries using multidimensional item response models.使用多维项目反应模型提高测试组合的测量精度。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):116-36. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.116.
10
A Class of Probabilistic Unfolding Models for Polytomous Responses.一类用于多分类响应的概率展开模型。
J Math Psychol. 2001 Apr;45(2):224-248. doi: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1310.