• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用IRTree模型在存在极端反应风格的情况下提高选择效度。

Using IRTree Models to Promote Selection Validity in the Presence of Extreme Response Styles.

作者信息

Quirk Victoria L, Kern Justin L

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Nov 17;11(11):216. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110216.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11110216
PMID:37998715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10672242/
Abstract

The measurement of psychological constructs is frequently based on self-report tests, which often have Likert-type items rated from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree". Recently, a family of item response theory (IRT) models called IRTree models have emerged that can parse out content traits (e.g., personality traits) from noise traits (e.g., response styles). In this study, we compare the selection validity and adverse impact consequences of noise traits on selection when scores are estimated using a generalized partial credit model (GPCM) or an IRTree model. First, we present a simulation which demonstrates that when noise traits do exist, the selection decisions made based on the IRTree model estimated scores have higher accuracy rates and have less instances of adverse impact based on extreme response style group membership when compared to the GPCM. Both models performed similarly when there was no influence of noise traits on the responses. Second, we present an application using data collected from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project Fisher Temperament Inventory dataset. We found that the IRTree model had a better fit, but a high agreement rate between the model decisions resulted in virtually identical impact ratios between the models. We offer considerations for applications of the IRTree model and future directions for research.

摘要

心理构念的测量通常基于自我报告测试,这类测试往往有从“强烈不同意”到“强烈同意”进行评分的李克特式项目。最近,出现了一类称为IRTree模型的项目反应理论(IRT)模型,它可以从噪声特质(如反应风格)中解析出内容特质(如人格特质)。在本研究中,我们比较了使用广义部分计分模型(GPCM)或IRTree模型估计分数时,噪声特质对选拔的选择效度和不利影响后果。首先,我们进行了一项模拟,结果表明当存在噪声特质时,与GPCM相比,基于IRTree模型估计分数做出的选拔决策具有更高的准确率,并且基于极端反应风格组成员身份的不利影响情况更少。当噪声特质对反应没有影响时,两个模型的表现相似。其次,我们展示了一个使用从开源心理测量项目费舍尔气质量表数据集中收集的数据的应用。我们发现IRTree模型拟合得更好,但模型决策之间的高一致率导致模型之间的影响比率几乎相同。我们为IRTree模型的应用提供了考虑因素以及未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/2cf8a54edb13/jintelligence-11-00216-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/e266d7cdb147/jintelligence-11-00216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/791120edbe60/jintelligence-11-00216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/ec3e5d853733/jintelligence-11-00216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/c4e386988dfd/jintelligence-11-00216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/1296be0699bf/jintelligence-11-00216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/201af1a9296a/jintelligence-11-00216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/6429fe3e9808/jintelligence-11-00216-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/65b2d3fb98c5/jintelligence-11-00216-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/d9bbc90e97bf/jintelligence-11-00216-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/a6d05c3c9076/jintelligence-11-00216-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/3331023f9ae9/jintelligence-11-00216-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/7bdb212cd0fa/jintelligence-11-00216-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/7b86c73903fa/jintelligence-11-00216-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/2cf8a54edb13/jintelligence-11-00216-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/e266d7cdb147/jintelligence-11-00216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/791120edbe60/jintelligence-11-00216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/ec3e5d853733/jintelligence-11-00216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/c4e386988dfd/jintelligence-11-00216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/1296be0699bf/jintelligence-11-00216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/201af1a9296a/jintelligence-11-00216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/6429fe3e9808/jintelligence-11-00216-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/65b2d3fb98c5/jintelligence-11-00216-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/d9bbc90e97bf/jintelligence-11-00216-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/a6d05c3c9076/jintelligence-11-00216-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/3331023f9ae9/jintelligence-11-00216-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/7bdb212cd0fa/jintelligence-11-00216-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/7b86c73903fa/jintelligence-11-00216-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337d/10672242/2cf8a54edb13/jintelligence-11-00216-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Using IRTree Models to Promote Selection Validity in the Presence of Extreme Response Styles.使用IRTree模型在存在极端反应风格的情况下提高选择效度。
J Intell. 2023 Nov 17;11(11):216. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110216.
2
Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.用 IRTree 方法研究极端反应偏差的不变性类型评估。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):517-537. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12182. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.用于研究李克特型评分量表中默许和极端反应方式的项目反应树模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):911-930. doi: 10.1177/0013164419829855. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
A Mixture IRTree Model for Extreme Response Style: Accounting for Response Process Uncertainty.一种用于极端反应风格的混合IRT树模型:考虑反应过程的不确定性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):131-154. doi: 10.1177/0013164420913915. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
Separation of Traits and Extreme Response Style in IRTree Models: The Role of Mimicry Effects for the Meaningful Interpretation of Estimates.IRTree模型中特质与极端反应风格的分离:模仿效应在估计值有意义解释中的作用。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):927-956. doi: 10.1177/00131644231213319. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
6
A Monte Carlo study of IRTree models' ability to recover item parameters.IRTree模型恢复项目参数能力的蒙特卡罗研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1003756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1003756. eCollection 2023.
7
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.具有不同项目反应结构的通用混合项目反应模型:应用于李克特量表的阐述。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2325-2344. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0997-0.
8
Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles.结合混合分布和多维 IRTree 模型测量极端反应风格。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):538-559. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12179. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
Investigating Heterogeneity in Response Strategies: A Mixture Multidimensional IRTree Approach.探究反应策略中的异质性:一种混合多维IRT树方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):957-993. doi: 10.1177/00131644231206765. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
10
Correcting for Extreme Response Style: Model Choice Matters.校正极端反应风格:模型选择很重要。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Feb;84(1):145-170. doi: 10.1177/00131644231155838. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling individual differences in cognitive response mechanisms for rating scale items: A flexible-mixture multidimensional IRTree approach.剖析评定量表项目认知反应机制中的个体差异:一种灵活混合的多维IRT树方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 13;57(9):256. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02778-0.
2
Internal consistency of the Mental Health Professional Culture Inventory: A pilot study in Romanian population.心理健康专业文化量表的内部一致性:罗马尼亚人群的一项初步研究。
Transl Neurosci. 2024 Dec 5;15(1):20220350. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0350. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact and Detection of Uniform Differential Item Functioning for Continuous Item Response Models.连续项目反应模型中均匀差异项目功能的影响与检测
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Oct;83(5):929-952. doi: 10.1177/00131644221111993. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
2
A Mixture IRTree Model for Extreme Response Style: Accounting for Response Process Uncertainty.一种用于极端反应风格的混合IRT树模型:考虑反应过程的不确定性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):131-154. doi: 10.1177/0013164420913915. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.
用于研究李克特型评分量表中默许和极端反应方式的项目反应树模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):911-930. doi: 10.1177/0013164419829855. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles.结合混合分布和多维 IRTree 模型测量极端反应风格。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):538-559. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12179. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
5
Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.用 IRTree 方法研究极端反应偏差的不变性类型评估。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):517-537. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12182. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
6
Extreme Response Style: A Simulation Study Comparison of Three Multidimensional Item Response Models.极端反应风格:三种多维项目反应模型的模拟研究比较
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jun;43(4):322-335. doi: 10.1177/0146621618789392. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
7
IRTree models with ordinal and multidimensional decision nodes for response styles and trait-based rating responses.用于响应风格和基于特质的评分响应的有序和多维决策节点的 IRTree 模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):501-516. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12158. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Mountain or Molehill? A Simulation Study on the Impact of Response Styles.小题大做还是大惊小怪?关于反应方式影响的模拟研究
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):32-53. doi: 10.1177/0013164416636655. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
9
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.具有不同项目反应结构的通用混合项目反应模型:应用于李克特量表的阐述。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2325-2344. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0997-0.
10
Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.基于阈值和多过程IRT模型的反应风格分析:综述与教程
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Feb;70(1):159-181. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12086.