• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Eelgrass ( L.) Restoration in Puget Sound: Development of a Site Suitability Assessment Process.普吉特海湾鳗草(L.)恢复:场地适宜性评估流程的制定
Restor Ecol. 2018;26(6):1066-1074. doi: 10.1111/rec.12702.
2
Ensemble habitat suitability modeling for predicting optimal sites for eelgrass (Zostera marina) in the tidal lagoon ecosystem: Implications for restoration and conservation.用于预测潮汐泻湖生态系统中鳗草(大叶藻)最佳生长地点的综合栖息地适宜性建模:对恢复和保护的启示
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117108. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
A network analysis of connected biophysical pathways to advice eelgrass (Zostera marina) restoration.连通生物物理途径网络分析以提供建议用于海草(Zostera marina)恢复。
Mar Environ Res. 2022 Jul;179:105690. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105690. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Site-specific success of three transplanting methods and the effect of planting time on the establishment of Zostera marina transplants.三种移植方法的特定地点成功率以及种植时间对大叶藻移植成活的影响。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007 Aug;54(8):1238-48. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.03.020. Epub 2007 May 21.
5
Impact of eelgrass bed recovery and expansion on phytoplankton growth through nutrient competition.通过营养竞争影响鳗草床的恢复和扩张对浮游植物生长的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:109898. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109898. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
6
Restoring eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) habitats using a simple and effective transplanting technique.利用简单有效的移植技术恢复鳗草(Zostera marina L.)栖息地。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e92982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092982. eCollection 2014.
7
An effective seed protection method for planting Zostera marina (eelgrass) seeds: Implications for their large-scale restoration.一种用于种植大叶藻种子的有效种子保护方法:对其大规模恢复的意义。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2015 Jun 15;95(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Responses of the Eelgrass L. to Water Depth and Light Availability in the Context of Increasing Coastal Water Turbidity: Implications for Conservation and Restoration.在沿海水体浊度增加背景下,鳗草对水深和光照可利用性的响应:对保护和恢复的启示
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 15;11:582557. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.582557. eCollection 2020.
9
Sonar and in situ surveys of eelgrass distribution, reproductive effort, and sexual recruitment contribution in a eutrophic bay with intensive human activities: Implication for seagrass conservation.在一个人类活动密集的富营养化海湾中,使用声纳和原位调查来研究鳗草的分布、繁殖努力和性繁殖贡献:对海草保护的启示。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Dec;161(Pt A):111706. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111706. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Salinity and temperature significantly influence seed germination, seedling establishment, and seedling growth of eelgrass L.盐度和温度显著影响鳗草的种子萌发、幼苗定植和幼苗生长。
PeerJ. 2016 Nov 15;4:e2697. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2697. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Nature-based solutions could offset coastal squeeze of tidal wetlands from sea-level rise on the U.S. Pacific coast.基于自然的解决方案可以抵消美国太平洋沿岸海平面上升对潮汐湿地造成的海岸挤压。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93437-z.
2
Rapid enhancement of multiple ecosystem services following the restoration of a coastal foundation species.沿海基础物种恢复后,多种生态系统服务迅速增强。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jan;32(1):e02466. doi: 10.1002/eap.2466. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Recovery and Community Succession of the Rhizobiome after Transplantation.根瘤菌移植后的恢复和群落演替。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 15;87(3). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02326-20.

本文引用的文献

1
A spatial model to improve site selection for seagrass restoration in shallow boating environments.一种用于改善浅滩划船环境中海草恢复选址的空间模型。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jan 15;186(Pt 1):42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems.全球海草加速消失,威胁着沿海生态系统。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 28;106(30):12377-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905620106. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

普吉特海湾鳗草(L.)恢复:场地适宜性评估流程的制定

Eelgrass ( L.) Restoration in Puget Sound: Development of a Site Suitability Assessment Process.

作者信息

Thom Ronald, Gaeckle Jeffrey, Buenau Kate, Borde Amy, Vavrinec John, Aston Lara, Woodruff Dana, Khangaonkar Tarang, Kaldy James

机构信息

Coastal Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, Washington 98382, USA.

Address correspondence to R. Thom,

出版信息

Restor Ecol. 2018;26(6):1066-1074. doi: 10.1111/rec.12702.

DOI:10.1111/rec.12702
PMID:31019361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6475914/
Abstract

The restoration of eelgrass ( L.) is a high priority in Puget Sound, Washington, United States. In 2011, the state set a restoration target to increase eelgrass area by 4,200 ha by 2020, a 20% increase over the 21,500 ha then present. In a region as large, dynamic and complex as Puget Sound, locating areas to restore eelgrass effectively and efficiently is challenging. To identify potential restoration sites we used simulation modeling, a geodatabase for spatial screening, and test planting. The simulation model of eelgrass biomass used time series of water properties (depth, temperature, and salinity) output from a regional hydrodynamic model and empirical water clarity data to indicate growth potential. The GIS-based analysis incorporated results from the simulation model, historical and current eelgrass area, substrate, stressors, and shoreline manager input into a geodatabase to screen sites for field reconnaissance. Finally, we planted eelgrass at test sites and monitored survival. We screened 2,630 sites and identified 6,292 ha of highly to very highly suitable conditions for eelgrass-ample area for meeting the 20% target. Test plantings indicated fine-scale data needs to improve predictive capability. We summarized the results of our analysis for the majority of the ~3,220 km of shoreline in Puget Sound on maps to support restoration site selection and planning. Our approach provides a process for identifying and testing potential restoration sites and highlights information needs and management actions to reduce stressors and increase eelgrass area to meet restoration objectives.

摘要

在美国华盛顿州普吉特海湾,大叶藻(L.)的恢复是一项高度优先的任务。2011年,该州设定了一个恢复目标,到2020年将大叶藻面积增加4200公顷,比当时的21500公顷增加20%。在像普吉特海湾这样广阔、动态且复杂的区域,有效且高效地确定大叶藻恢复区域具有挑战性。为了确定潜在的恢复地点,我们使用了模拟建模、用于空间筛选的地理数据库以及试种。大叶藻生物量模拟模型利用区域水动力模型输出的水属性(深度、温度和盐度)时间序列以及经验性的水体透明度数据来指示生长潜力。基于地理信息系统(GIS)的分析将模拟模型的结果、历史和当前的大叶藻面积、基质、压力源以及海岸线管理者的输入整合到一个地理数据库中,以筛选实地勘察的地点。最后,我们在试验地点种植大叶藻并监测其成活率。我们筛选了2630个地点,确定了6292公顷非常适合到极其适合大叶藻生长的区域——有足够的面积来实现20%的目标。试种表明需要精细尺度的数据来提高预测能力。我们将对普吉特海湾约3220千米海岸线大部分区域的分析结果汇总到地图上,以支持恢复地点的选择和规划。我们的方法提供了一个确定和测试潜在恢复地点的过程,并突出了信息需求以及减少压力源和增加大叶藻面积以实现恢复目标的管理行动。