Suppr超能文献

美国本土火烧面积估计的不确定性对模拟野火细颗粒物和臭氧污染的影响

Influence of uncertainties in burned area estimates on modeled wildland fire PM and ozone pollution in the contiguous U.S.

作者信息

Koplitz Shannon N, Nolte Christopher G, Pouliot George A, Vukovich Jeffrey M, Beidler James

机构信息

US EPA Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

US EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Atmos Environ (1994). 2018;191:328-339. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.020.

Abstract

Wildland fires are a major source of fine particulate matter (PM), one of the most harmful ambient pollutants for human health globally. To represent the influence of wildland fire emissions on atmospheric composition, regional and global chemical transport models rely on emission inventories developed from estimates of burned area (i.e. fire size and location). While different methods of estimating annual burned area agree reasonably well in the western U.S. (within 20-30% for most years during 2002-2014), estimates for the southern U.S. can vary by more than a factor of 5. These differences in burned area lead to significant variability in the spatial and temporal allocation of emissions across fire emission inventory platforms. In this work, we implement wildland fire emission estimates for 2011 from three different products - the USEPA National Emission Inventory (NEI), the Fire Inventory of NCAR (FINN), and the Global Fire Emission Database (GFED4s) - into the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to quantify and characterize differences in simulated PM and ozone concentrations across the contiguous U.S. (CONUS) due to the fire emission inventory used. The NEI is developed specifically for the U.S., while both FINN and GFED4s are available globally. We find that NEI emissions lead to the largest increases in modeled annual average PM (0.85 μg m) and April-September maximum daily 8-h ozone (0.28 ppb) nationally compared to a "no fire" baseline, followed by FINN (0.33 μg m and 0.22 ppb) and GFED4s (0.12 μg m and 0.17 ppb). Annual mean enhancements in wildland fire pollution are highest in the southern U.S. across all three inventories (over 4 μg m and 2 ppb in some areas), but show considerable spatial variability within these regions. We also examine the representation of five individual fire events during 2011 and find that of the two global inventories, FINN reproduces more of the acute changes in pollutant concentrations modeled with NEI and shown in surface observations during each of the episodes investigated compared to GFED4s. Understanding the sensitivity of modeling fire-related PM and ozone in the U.S. to burned area estimation approaches will inform future efforts to assess the implications of present and future fire activity for air quality and human health at national and global scales.

摘要

野火是细颗粒物(PM)的主要来源之一,细颗粒物是全球对人类健康危害最大的环境污染物之一。为了体现野火排放对大气成分的影响,区域和全球化学传输模型依赖于根据燃烧面积(即火灾规模和位置)估算得出的排放清单。虽然估算美国西部年度燃烧面积的不同方法在结果上相当吻合(2002 - 2014年的大多数年份误差在20% - 30%以内),但美国南部的估算结果差异可能超过5倍。燃烧面积的这些差异导致火灾排放清单平台间排放的时空分配存在显著差异。在这项工作中,我们将2011年来自三种不同产品——美国环境保护局国家排放清单(NEI)、美国国家大气研究中心火灾清单(FINN)和全球火灾排放数据库(GFED4s)——的野火排放估算结果应用于社区多尺度空气质量(CMAQ)模型,以量化和描述因使用的火灾排放清单不同而导致的美国本土(CONUS)模拟PM和臭氧浓度的差异。NEI是专门为美国开发的,而FINN和GFED4s在全球范围内均可获取。我们发现,与“无火灾”基线相比,NEI排放导致全国范围内模拟的年平均PM增加最多(0.85 μg/m³),4月至9月的每日最大8小时臭氧增加(0.28 ppb),其次是FINN(0.33 μg/m³和0.22 ppb)和GFED4s(0.12 μg/m³和0.17 ppb)。在所有三种清单中,美国南部的野火污染年平均增强幅度最高(某些地区超过4 μg/m³和2 ppb),但在这些区域内显示出相当大的空间变异性。我们还研究了2011年五个单独火灾事件的表现,发现与GFED4s相比,在两种全球清单中,FINN在每个调查事件中更能再现NEI模拟的且在地面观测中显示的污染物浓度的急剧变化。了解美国模拟与火灾相关的PM和臭氧对燃烧面积估算方法的敏感性,将为未来在国家和全球尺度上评估当前和未来火灾活动对空气质量和人类健康影响的工作提供参考。

相似文献

8
Modeling Wildland Fire-Specific PM Concentrations for Uncertainty-Aware Health Impact Assessments.
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 15;53(20):11828-11839. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02660. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
Using wildland fire smoke modeling data in gerontological health research (California, 2007-2018).
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 3):156403. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156403. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
A SPATIAL CAUSAL ANALYSIS OF WILDLAND FIRE-CONTRIBUTED PM USING NUMERICAL MODEL OUTPUT.
Ann Appl Stat. 2022 Dec;16(4):2714-2731. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1610. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A State of the Science Review of Wildfire-Specific Fine Particulate Matter Data Sources, Methods, and Models.
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):66001. doi: 10.1289/EHP15672. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
Wildfire Impacts on O in the Continental United States Using PM and a Generalized Additive Model (2018-2023).
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 20;58(33):14764-14774. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c05870. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
5
Mortality attributable to PM from wildland fires in California from 2008 to 2018.
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 7;10(23):eadl1252. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl1252.
6
Quantifying fire-specific smoke exposure and health impacts.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 19;120(51):e2309325120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309325120. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
7
Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke Exposure.
Annu Rev Med. 2024 Jan 29;75:277-292. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-052422-020909. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
10
The changing risk and burden of wildfire in the United States.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011048118.

本文引用的文献

1
Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.
Geosci Model Dev. 2017;10(4):1703-1732. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017.
2
Dynamic Evaluation of Two Decades of WRF-CMAQ Ozone Simulations over the Contiguous United States.
Atmos Environ (1994). 2017;164:102-116. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.020.
3
Biomass Burning Smoke Climatology of the United States: Implications for Particulate Matter Air Quality.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 17;51(20):11731-11741. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03292. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
4
The health impacts and economic value of wildland fire episodes in the U.S.: 2008-2012.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:802-809. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
5
Particulate Air Pollution from Wildfires in the Western US under Climate Change.
Clim Change. 2016 Oct;138(3):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1762-6. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
Temporal comparison of global inventories of CO emissions from biomass burning during 2002-2011 derived from remotely sensed data.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jul;24(20):16905-16916. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9141-z. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 14;114(11):2946-2951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617394114. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Climate change and the eco-hydrology of fire: Will area burned increase in a warming western USA?
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jan;27(1):26-36. doi: 10.1002/eap.1420. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
Development of the crop residue and rangeland burning in the 2014 National Emissions Inventory using information from multiple sources.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):613-622. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1268982. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
10
Wildfire-specific Fine Particulate Matter and Risk of Hospital Admissions in Urban and Rural Counties.
Epidemiology. 2017 Jan;28(1):77-85. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000556.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验