Suppr超能文献

炎症性肠病中从英夫利昔单抗转换为生物类似药:文献综述与展望

Switching from infliximab to biosimilar in inflammatory bowel disease: overview of the literature and perspective.

作者信息

Milassin Ágnes, Fábián Anna, Molnár Tamás

机构信息

First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Hungary.

First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Korányi fasor 8-10, Hungary.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 15;12:1756284819842748. doi: 10.1177/1756284819842748. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biological therapy has revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). After the expiration of patents for biological innovator products, development of biosimilars increased. CT-P13 was the first biosimilar approved for the same indications as the reference product; however, the approval was based on extrapolated data from rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Our aim was to review clinical studies about switching from originator infliximab (IFX-O) to biosimilar infliximab (IXF-B) in IBD, focusing on recently published data and the future of biosimilars.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for original articles published up to 1 December 2018 reporting data on IFX-B in IBD.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies assessing switching from IFX-O to IFX-B, 14 assessing induction therapy with IFX-B were found. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were discussed. Studies confirm that CT-P13 is safe and equally efficient as the reference product for both induction and maintenance therapy; and that switching from the reference product to biosimilar is non-inferior to continuous biosimilar use. However, efficacy and safety data on Flixabi (SB2) in IBD patients is lacking.

CONCLUSION

Switching from the originator to a biosimilar in patients with IBD is acceptable, although scientific and clinical evidence is lacking regarding reverse switching, multiple switching and cross-switching among biosimilars in IBD patients.

摘要

背景

生物疗法彻底改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗方式。生物创新产品专利到期后,生物类似药的研发有所增加。CT-P13是首个获批用于与参比产品相同适应症的生物类似药;然而,其获批是基于类风湿关节炎和强直性脊柱炎的外推数据。我们的目的是回顾关于IBD患者从原研英夫利昔单抗(IFX-O)转换为生物类似药英夫利昔单抗(IXF-B)的临床研究,重点关注近期发表的数据以及生物类似药的未来。

方法

在PubMed数据库中检索截至2018年12月1日发表的关于IBD中IXF-B数据的原始文章。

结果

共发现29项评估从IFX-O转换为IFX-B的研究,14项评估IFX-B诱导治疗的研究。对疗效、安全性和免疫原性进行了讨论。研究证实,CT-P13在诱导和维持治疗中均安全且与参比产品疗效相当;从参比产品转换为生物类似药不劣于持续使用生物类似药。然而,IBD患者中Flixabi(SB2)的疗效和安全性数据尚缺乏。

结论

IBD患者从原研药转换为生物类似药是可接受的,尽管IBD患者在反向转换、多次转换以及生物类似药之间的交叉转换方面缺乏科学和临床证据。

相似文献

10
Biosimilars in ulcerative colitis: When and for who?生物类似药在溃疡性结肠炎中的应用:何时及针对哪些患者?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb-Apr;32-33:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 26.

引用本文的文献

7
The Law and Ethics of Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar in Canada.加拿大生物药转换为生物类似药的法律与伦理
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;3(5):228-233. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz043. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验