Suppr超能文献

一项促进使用患者报告结局测量指标的实施干预措施对临床医生基于证据的实践认知、实施领导力和团队运作的影响。

Effects of an Implementation Intervention to Promote Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Clinicians' Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice, Implementation Leadership, and Team Functioning.

作者信息

Heinemann Allen W, Nitsch Kristian P, Ehrlich-Jones Linda, Malamut Leah, Semik Patrick, Srdanovic Nina, Kocherginsky Masha, Hobbs Sara

机构信息

Mr. Heinemann: professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, and Director Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Nitsch: postdoctoral fellow, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Ms. Ehrlich-Jones: Research associate professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, and assistant director, Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois. Ms. Malamut: project coordinator, Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Semik: data analyst, Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois. Ms. Srdanovic: Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Dr. Kocherginsky: Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Ms. Hobbs: therapy manager, Spinal Cord Innovation Center, Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2019 Spring;39(2):103-111. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000249.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are administered rarely during rehabilitation hospitalizations because clinicians are unfamiliar with their use and the technology to integrate PROMs into electronic medical records is nascent. This study evaluated an implementation intervention that targeted teams' perceptions of evidence-based practice (EBP), implementation leadership, and team functioning that might facilitate PROM use.

METHODS

We compared clinicians' perceptions on three inpatient rehabilitation units, with sequential implementation across units. Clinicians completed the EBP Attitudes Scale, Implementation Leadership Scale, and the Team Functioning Survey before, shortly after, and 1 month after training.

RESULTS

Forty-seven clinicians participated, including nurses (27.7%), occupational (21.3%) and physical therapists (21.3%), and two physicians. They worked on spinal cord injury (46.8%), neurologic (40.4%), or pediatric (12.8%) units. EBP Attitude Scale scores improved from preintervention to postintervention and remained above baseline levels at follow-up. The interaction between time and unit was statistically significant for the Divergence subscale such that Pediatric Unit scores increased from preintervention to postintervention and follow-up, while on the spinal cord injury, unit scores increased from preintervention to postintervention, and on the Neurologic Unit scores declined from preintervention to postintervention and follow-up. The EBP Attitudes Requirements score increased at postintervention and follow-up. The Implementation Leadership Scale Proactive score and team functioning survey scores decreased slightly.

DISCUSSION

Implementing PROMs had varied effects on EBP attitudes and perceptions of leadership and team functioning. Perceptions across units were distinctive on the Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale Divergence subscale. Introduction of PROMs should consider clinician attitudes regarding EBP as well as implementation leadership and team functioning.

摘要

引言

患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在康复住院期间很少使用,因为临床医生不熟悉其用法,且将PROMs整合到电子病历中的技术尚不成熟。本研究评估了一项实施干预措施,该措施针对团队对循证实践(EBP)、实施领导力和可能促进PROMs使用的团队功能的认知。

方法

我们比较了三个住院康复单元的临床医生的认知情况,并在各单元依次实施。临床医生在培训前、培训后不久以及培训后1个月完成了循证实践态度量表、实施领导力量表和团队功能调查。

结果

47名临床医生参与,包括护士(27.7%)、职业治疗师(21.3%)和物理治疗师(21.3%)以及两名医生。他们在脊髓损伤(46.8%)、神经科(40.4%)或儿科(12.8%)单元工作。循证实践态度量表得分从干预前到干预后有所提高,且在随访时保持在基线水平以上。对于“分歧”子量表,时间与单元之间的交互作用具有统计学意义,因此儿科单元得分从干预前到干预后及随访时有所增加,而脊髓损伤单元得分从干预前到干预后增加,神经科单元得分从干预前到干预后及随访时下降。循证实践态度需求得分在干预后和随访时增加。实施领导力量表的主动得分和团队功能调查得分略有下降。

讨论

实施PROMs对循证实践态度以及对领导力和团队功能的认知有不同影响。在循证实践态度量表“分歧”子量表上,各单元的认知存在差异。引入PROMs应考虑临床医生对循证实践的态度以及实施领导力和团队功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验