Suppr超能文献

日本版护士长及护士实施领导力量表的信效度:一项横断面研究

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Implementation Leadership Scale for Nurse Managers and Staff Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Saiki Masatoshi, Tomotaki Ai, Fukahori Hiroki, Yamamoto Takeshi, Nishigaki Masakazu, Matsuoka Chiyo, Yasuda Emi, Sakai Ikuko

机构信息

Department of Advanced Clinical Nursing, Frontier Clinical Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Faculty of Nursing, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2023 Oct 23;2023:4080434. doi: 10.1155/2023/4080434. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strategic leadership is key to implementing evidence-based practice (EBP). Evaluating the readiness and processes necessary to implement EBP using the Japanese version of the implementation leadership scale (ILS) may be useful to systematically promote the implementation of EBP in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ILS for nurse managers and staff nurses.

METHODS

Data were collected in a cross-sectional study. The original ILS was translated into Japanese and back-translated into English. Clinical nurses reviewed it and confirmed its face validity. We distributed a web questionnaire to 119 nurse managers and 2,858 staff nurses working at three university hospitals in Japan's metropolitan areas. Construct validity was assessed for nursing managers and staff nurses, respectively, using confirmatory factor analysis. Known-group validity for nurse managers was assessed by verifying differences in ILS scores by educational background and experience of learning EBP and working on EBP. We evaluated reliability using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

The response rates for nurse managers and staff nurses were 56.3% and 16.9%, respectively. Data from 67 nursing managers and 484 staff nurses were analyzed, excluding duplicate responses. Confirmatory factor analyses of both samples supported the four-factor structure of ILS. The ILS total score of nurse managers with experience learning EBP or experience working on EBP was statistically significantly higher than that of those with no experience, and known-group validity was supported. Across both samples, internal consistency reliability was strong (Cronbach's alpha: 0.91-0.97) and test-retest reliability was moderate.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrated the reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the ILS for both nurse managers and staff nurses. This study enabled international comparisons of the leadership required for EBP implementation and may support the development of intervention programs and strategies to promote EBP's implementation in different countries. . UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR). This trail is registered with UMIN000045782.

摘要

背景

战略领导力是实施循证实践(EBP)的关键。使用日语版实施领导力量表(ILS)评估实施EBP所需的准备情况和流程,可能有助于在日本系统地推动EBP的实施。本研究旨在评估日语版ILS对护士长和护士的信效度。

方法

在一项横断面研究中收集数据。将原始ILS翻译成日语,然后再回译成英语。临床护士对其进行审核并确认其表面效度。我们向日本大都市地区三家大学医院的119名护士长和2858名护士发放了网络问卷。分别使用验证性因素分析对护士长和护士的结构效度进行评估。通过验证不同教育背景以及学习EBP和开展EBP经验的护士长在ILS得分上的差异,评估护士长的已知群体效度。我们使用Cronbach's α系数和重测信度来评估信度。

结果

护士长和护士的回复率分别为56.3%和16.9%。排除重复回复后,对67名护士长和484名护士的数据进行了分析。两个样本的验证性因素分析均支持ILS的四因素结构。有学习EBP经验或开展EBP经验的护士长的ILS总分在统计学上显著高于无经验者,已知群体效度得到支持。在两个样本中,内部一致性信度较强(Cronbach's α系数:0.91 - 0.97),重测信度中等。

结论

本研究证明了日语版ILS对护士长和护士的信效度。本研究能够对实施EBP所需的领导力进行国际比较,并可能支持制定干预计划和策略,以促进EBP在不同国家的实施。. 日本大学医学信息网络临床试验注册中心(UMIN - CTR)。本试验已在UMIN000045782注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a4c/11918985/deed4726c79f/JONM2023-4080434.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验