Emergency Department, Cochin University Hospital (APHP) and Paris Descartes University.
Sudden Death Expertise Center, INSERM U970 (Team 4), PARCC, Paris.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Jun;25(3):204-210. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000613.
There is a need for an early assessment of outcome in patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest. During the last decade, several models were developed in order to identify predictive factors that may facilitate prognostication and stratification of outcome.
In addition to prognostication tools that are used in intensive care, at least five scores were recently developed using large datasets, based on simple and immediately available parameters, such as circumstances of arrest and early in-hospital indicators. Regarding neurological outcome, predictive performance of these models is good and even excellent for some of them. These scores perform very well for identifying patients at high-risk of unfavorable outcome. The most important limitation of these scores remains the lack of replication in different communities. In addition, these scores were not developed for individual decision- making, but they could instead be useful for the description and comparison of different cohorts, and also to design trials targeting specific categories of patients regarding outcome. Finally, the recent development of big data allows extension of research in epidemiology of cardiac arrest, including the identification of new prognostic factors and the improvement of prediction according to the profile of populations.
In addition to the development of artificial intelligence, the prediction approach based on adequate scores will further increase the knowledge in prognostication after cardiac arrest. This strategy may help to develop treatment strategies according to the predicted severity of the outcome.
心脏骤停后自主循环恢复患者需要进行早期预后评估。在过去十年中,为了确定可能有助于预后判断和结局分层的预测因素,已经开发了几种模型。
除了在重症监护中使用的预后工具外,最近还使用大型数据集基于简单且可立即获得的参数(如骤停情况和早期院内指标)开发了至少五个评分系统。关于神经功能结局,这些模型的预测性能很好,有些模型甚至非常出色。这些评分系统非常适合识别预后不良风险较高的患者。这些评分系统的最重要局限性仍然是缺乏在不同人群中的复制。此外,这些评分系统不是为个体决策制定的,但它们可以用于描述和比较不同队列,也可以用于根据患者的结局特征设计针对特定类别的患者的试验。最后,大数据的最新发展允许扩展心脏骤停流行病学的研究,包括识别新的预后因素,并根据人群特征提高预测准确性。
除了人工智能的发展之外,基于适当评分的预测方法将进一步提高心脏骤停后预后判断的知识水平。这种策略可能有助于根据预测的结局严重程度制定治疗策略。