Suppr超能文献

水平旋转和平移过程中的前庭眼反射及动态视敏度

Vestibulo-Ocular Responses and Dynamic Visual Acuity During Horizontal Rotation and Translation.

作者信息

Ramaioli Cecilia, Cuturi Luigi F, Ramat Stefano, Lehnen Nadine, MacNeilage Paul R

机构信息

German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.

Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 9;10:321. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00321. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) provides an overall functional measure of visual stabilization performance that depends on the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), but also on other processes, including catch-up saccades and likely visual motion processing. Capturing the efficiency of gaze stabilization against head movement as a whole, it is potentially valuable in the clinical context where assessment of overall patient performance provides an important indication of factors impacting patient participation and quality of life. DVA during head rotation (rDVA) has been assessed previously, but to our knowledge, DVA during horizontal translation (tDVA) has not been measured. tDVA can provide a valuable measure of how otolith, rather than canal, function impacts visual acuity. In addition, comparison of DVA during rotation and translation can shed light on whether common factors are limiting DVA performance in both cases. We therefore measured and compared DVA during both passive head rotations (head impulse test) and translations in the same set of healthy subjects ( = 7). In addition to DVA, we computed average VOR gain and retinal slip within and across subjects. We observed that during translation, VOR gain was reduced (VOR during rotation, mean ± SD: position gain = 1.05 ± 0.04, velocity gain = 0.97 ± 0.07; VOR during translation, mean ± SD: position gain = 0.21 ± 0.08, velocity gain = 0.51 ± 0.16), retinal slip was increased, and tDVA was worse than during rotation (average rDVA = 0.32 ± 0.15 logMAR; average tDVA = 0.56 ± 0.09 logMAR, = 0.02). This suggests that reduced VOR gain leads to worse tDVA, as expected. We conclude with speculation about non-oculomotor factors that could vary across individuals and affect performance similarly during both rotation and translation.

摘要

动态视敏度(DVA)提供了一种视觉稳定性能的整体功能测量方法,它不仅依赖于前庭眼反射(VOR),还依赖于其他过程,包括追赶性扫视以及可能的视觉运动处理。作为对头部运动时注视稳定效率的整体衡量,它在临床环境中具有潜在价值,因为对患者整体表现的评估能为影响患者参与度和生活质量的因素提供重要指标。此前已对头部旋转时的DVA(rDVA)进行过评估,但据我们所知,水平平移时的DVA(tDVA)尚未被测量。tDVA可以提供一个有价值的指标,用于衡量耳石而非半规管功能对视敏度的影响。此外,比较旋转和平移过程中的DVA可以揭示在这两种情况下,是否存在共同因素限制了DVA表现。因此,我们在同一组健康受试者(n = 7)中测量并比较了被动头部旋转(头部脉冲试验)和平移过程中的DVA。除了DVA,我们还计算了受试者内部和受试者之间的平均VOR增益以及视网膜滑移。我们观察到,在平移过程中,VOR增益降低(旋转时的VOR,平均值±标准差:位置增益 = 1.05 ± 0.04,速度增益 = 0.97 ± 0.07;平移时的VOR,平均值±标准差:位置增益 = 0.21 ± 0.08,速度增益 = 0.51 ± 0.16),视网膜滑移增加,并且tDVA比旋转时更差(平均rDVA = 0.32 ± 0.15 logMAR;平均tDVA = 0.56 ± 0.09 logMAR,p = 0.02)。这表明,正如预期的那样,VOR增益降低会导致tDVA变差。我们最后推测了可能因人而异且在旋转和平移过程中对表现产生类似影响的非眼动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd5/6467074/8b597951162f/fneur-10-00321-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验