Bubici Giovanni, Kaushal Manoj, Prigigallo Maria Isabella, Gómez-Lama Cabanás Carmen, Mercado-Blanco Jesús
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante (IPSP), Bari, Italy.
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 5;10:616. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00616. eCollection 2019.
In the last century, the banana crop and industry experienced dramatic losses due to an epidemic of Fusarium wilt of banana (FWB), caused by f.sp. () race 1. An even more dramatic menace is now feared due to the spread of tropical race 4. Plant genetic resistance is generally considered as the most plausible strategy for controlling effectively such a devastating disease, as occurred for the first round of FWB epidemic. Nevertheless, with at least 182 articles published since 1970, biological control represents a large body of knowledge on FWB. Remarkably, many studies deal with biological control agents (BCAs) that reached the field-testing stage and even refer to high effectiveness. Some selected BCAs have been repeatedly assayed in independent trials, suggesting their promising value. Overall under field conditions, FWB has been controlled up to 79% by using spp. strains, and up to 70% by several endophytes and spp. strains. Lower biocontrol efficacy (42-55%) has been obtained with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, spp., and non-pathogenic strains. Studies on spp. have been mostly limited to conditions so far, with very few pot-experiments, and none conducted in the field. The BCAs have been applied with diverse procedures (e.g., spore suspension, organic amendments, bioformulations, etc.) and at different stages of plant development (i.e., , nursery, at transplanting, post-transplanting), but there has been no evidence for a protocol better than another. Nonetheless, new bioformulation technologies (e.g., nanotechnology, formulation of microbial consortia and/or their metabolites, etc.) and tailor-made consortia of microbial strains should be encouraged. In conclusion, the literature offers many examples of promising BCAs, suggesting that biocontrol can greatly contribute to limit the damage caused by FWB. More efforts should be done to further validate the currently available outcomes, to deepen the knowledge on the most valuable BCAs, and to improve their efficacy by setting up effective formulations, application protocols, and integrated strategies.
在上个世纪,香蕉作物和产业因由尖孢镰刀菌古巴专化型(Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense)1号生理小种引起的香蕉枯萎病(FWB)流行而遭受了巨大损失。由于热带4号生理小种的传播,现在人们担心会出现更严重的威胁。与第一轮香蕉枯萎病疫情的情况一样,植物遗传抗性通常被认为是有效控制这种毁灭性疾病的最可行策略。然而,自1970年以来至少发表了182篇文章,生物防治代表了关于香蕉枯萎病的大量知识。值得注意的是,许多研究涉及已进入田间试验阶段的生物防治剂(BCAs),甚至提到了其高效性。一些选定的生物防治剂已在独立试验中反复进行了测定,表明它们具有可观的价值。总体而言,在田间条件下,使用芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)菌株可将香蕉枯萎病控制在79%以内,使用几种内生菌和芽孢杆菌属菌株可控制在70%以内。丛枝菌根真菌、木霉属(Trichoderma)和非致病尖孢镰刀菌菌株的生物防治效果较低(42 - 55%)。迄今为止,关于木霉属的研究大多局限于实验室条件,盆栽试验很少,且没有田间试验。生物防治剂已通过多种方法(如孢子悬浮液、有机改良剂、生物制剂等)并在植物发育的不同阶段(即育苗期、移栽时、移栽后)进行了应用,但没有证据表明一种方案比另一种更好。尽管如此,应鼓励采用新的生物制剂技术(如纳米技术、微生物群落和/或其代谢产物的制剂等)以及定制的微生物菌株组合。总之,文献提供了许多有前景的生物防治剂的例子,表明生物防治可极大地有助于减少香蕉枯萎病造成的损害。应做出更多努力,以进一步验证目前已有的成果,加深对最有价值的生物防治剂的了解,并通过建立有效的制剂、应用方案和综合策略来提高其功效。