Suppr超能文献

兽医手术中单纯连续腹壁缝合的缝线长度与伤口长度比:一项实验性体外研究。

Suture length to wound length ratio for simple continuous abdominal closures in veterinary surgery: An experimental in vitro study.

机构信息

Clinical Unit of Small Animal Surgery, Department for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 26;14(4):e0215641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215641. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the suture length to wound length ratio (SL:WL) in an in vitro model of abdominal wall closure. Effects of the surgeon's experience level on the SL:WL ratio were evaluated, hypothesizing that small animal surgeons do not spontaneously apply SL:WL ratios equal to or larger than 4:1.

PROCEDURES

Three groups of surgeons with varying levels of experience performed 4 simple continuous sutures before (3 sutures) and after (1 suture) being educated on principles of the SL:WL ratio. All sutures were evaluated for their gaping, number of stitches, stitch intervals, tissue bite size and suture length.

RESULTS

No significant differences in suture parameters or SL:WL ratios were found among the 3 groups, and 60.5% of control sutures and 77.0% of test sutures had SL:WL ratios above 4:1. There was a significant improvement in the mean ratio after the information was provided (p = 0.003). Overall, the SL:WL ratios ranged from 1.54:1 to 6.81:1, with 36.3% falling between 4:1 and 5:1 (5.17 mm mean stitch interval, 5.52 mm mean tissue bite size). A significant negative correlation was observed between the SL:WL ratio and the stitch interval to tissue bite ratio (r = -0.886). Forty-nine of 120 sutures fulfilled the current recommendations for abdominal wall closure with a mean SL:WL ratio of 4.1:1.

CONCLUSION

A SL:WL ratio larger than 4:1 was achieved in 60% of the control sutures and in 77% of test sutures. Additional animal studies are necessary to evaluate the SL/WL ratio in small animal surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨腹壁缝合的体外模型中的缝合线长度与伤口长度比(SL:WL)。评估外科医生经验水平对 SL:WL 比值的影响,假设小动物外科医生不会自发应用等于或大于 4:1 的 SL:WL 比值。

手术过程

三组经验水平不同的外科医生在接受 SL:WL 比值原则教育之前(3 个缝线)和之后(1 个缝线)进行了 4 个简单连续缝线。所有缝线均评估其开裂、缝线数量、缝线间隔、组织咬合力和缝线长度。

结果

三组缝线参数或 SL:WL 比值均无显著差异,60.5%的对照缝线和 77.0%的试验缝线的 SL:WL 比值大于 4:1。提供信息后,平均比值显著改善(p = 0.003)。总体而言,SL:WL 比值范围为 1.54:1 至 6.81:1,其中 36.3%在 4:1 和 5:1 之间(平均缝线间隔 5.17mm,平均组织咬合力 5.52mm)。SL:WL 比值与缝线间隔与组织咬合力的比值呈显著负相关(r = -0.886)。120 个缝线中有 49 个符合当前腹壁缝合的建议,平均 SL:WL 比值为 4.1:1。

结论

在 60%的对照缝线和 77%的试验缝线中实现了大于 4:1 的 SL:WL 比值。需要进一步的动物研究来评估小动物外科中的 SL/WL 比值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a562/6485905/add7f4626c1f/pone.0215641.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验