Hassan Karen A, Galuppo Larry D, van Hoogmoed Linda M
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Vet Surg. 2006 Apr;35(3):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00149.x.
To compare bursting strength and failure modes of ventral median abdominal incisions closed with loop suture in a simple continuous pattern using two different suture-bite intervals.
In vitro experiment.
Equine cadavers (n=14; weighing >318 kg; postmortem interval <2 hours).
A template was used to make a 25 cm incision with suture interval and bite size of either 1.0 cm x 1.5 cm or 1.5 cm x 1.5 cm. A 200 L polyurethane bladder was inserted within the abdomen and insufflated to create abdominal wall tension. Celiotomies were closed with a #2 braided lactomer 9-1 continuous pattern with a loop suture. Deviation from the linea, closure time (minutes), total suture length (cm), suture length to wound ratio (SL:WL), bursting pressure (mm Hg), and failure modes (fascial or suture) were compared between groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Significance was set at P<.05.
No significant differences were identified between closing time, total suture length used, SL:WL, bursting pressure, or failure mode. Fascial failure was the main failure mode for both techniques; suture failure occurred rarely and knot failure did not occur.
Based on the overall bursting pressure and failure mode, #2 braided lactomer loop suture placed in a continuous pattern should provide sufficient security for closure of the equine linea alba during recovery and the immediate postoperative period.
Although there were no significant differences in the 2 patterns evaluated, the 1.5 cm x 1.5 cm pattern may have potential advantages for closure time, less total suture remaining in the wound, and strength.
比较采用两种不同缝线间距的简单连续缝合法,以环形缝合法闭合腹正中切口的抗破裂强度和失败模式。
体外实验。
马尸体(n = 14;体重>318千克;死后间隔<2小时)。
使用模板制作一个25厘米的切口,缝线间距和咬边大小分别为1.0厘米×1.5厘米或1.5厘米×1.5厘米。将一个200升的聚氨酯膀胱插入腹腔并充气以产生腹壁张力。剖腹术采用2号编织聚乙醇酸9-1连续缝合法并以环形缝合法闭合。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组之间的偏离白线情况、闭合时间(分钟)、总缝线长度(厘米)、缝线长度与伤口长度之比(SL:WL)、破裂压力(毫米汞柱)和失败模式(筋膜或缝线)。显著性设定为P<0.05。
在闭合时间、使用的总缝线长度、SL:WL、破裂压力或失败模式方面未发现显著差异。筋膜破裂是两种技术的主要失败模式;缝线破裂很少发生,结破裂未发生。
基于总体破裂压力和失败模式,以连续缝合法放置的2号编织聚乙醇酸环形缝线在恢复期间和术后即刻应为马白线的闭合提供足够的安全性。
尽管在评估的两种模式中没有显著差异,但1.5厘米×1.5厘米的模式在闭合时间、伤口中剩余的总缝线较少以及强度方面可能具有潜在优势。