• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物福利法规应该更加严格吗?以八个欧盟国家为例的案例研究。

Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries.

作者信息

Pejman Niloofar, Kallas Zein, Dalmau Antoni, Velarde Antonio

机构信息

Institute for Research in Sustainability Science and Technology (IS-UPC), Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.

Centre for Agro-food Economy and Development, CREDA-UPC-IRTA, 08860 Castelldefels, Spain.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 25;9(4):195. doi: 10.3390/ani9040195.

DOI:10.3390/ani9040195
PMID:31027232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6523126/
Abstract

Increasingly, intensive livestock production systems have increased societal concern regarding the current animal welfare standards. We investigated whether individuals in their roles as consumers and citizens believe that the current European regulations regarding animal welfare should be more restrictive. Factors affecting this decision were assessed by analyzing respondents' understanding of animal welfare-related issues, their subjective and objective knowledge levels, the credibility they assign to different information sources, their perceptions toward the current restrictiveness of animal welfare standards, and their socioeconomic characteristics. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed in eight European Union (EU) countries (Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Italy, and Sweden) with 3860 total responses. The results showed that consumers are more reluctant to adopt more restrictive regulations than respondents in the role of citizens. Respondents from northern European countries (Poland and Sweden) are more likely to support regulations that are more restrictive than the current minimum requirements than respondents from southern countries (Spain and Italy). Women were found to be more concerned with the welfare of pigs and laying hens-lending credibility to the Internet as an information source-and were more likely to support more restrictive animal welfare legislation.

摘要

集约化畜牧生产系统日益引发了社会对当前动物福利标准的关注。我们调查了作为消费者和公民的个人是否认为当前欧洲有关动物福利的法规应更加严格。通过分析受访者对动物福利相关问题的理解、他们的主观和客观知识水平、他们赋予不同信息来源的可信度、他们对当前动物福利标准严格程度的看法以及他们的社会经济特征,评估了影响这一决定的因素。使用在八个欧盟国家(西班牙、英国、波兰、希腊、立陶宛、罗马尼亚、意大利和瑞典)分发的半结构化问卷收集数据,共收到3860份回复。结果表明,与作为公民的受访者相比,消费者更不愿意采用更严格的法规。来自北欧国家(波兰和瑞典)的受访者比来自南方国家(西班牙和意大利)的受访者更有可能支持比当前最低要求更严格的法规。研究发现,女性更关注猪和蛋鸡的福利——这使互联网作为信息来源具有可信度——并且更有可能支持更严格的动物福利立法。

相似文献

1
Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries.动物福利法规应该更加严格吗?以八个欧盟国家为例的案例研究。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 25;9(4):195. doi: 10.3390/ani9040195.
2
Should Animal Welfare be Included in Educational Programs? Attitudes of Secondary and University Students from Eight EU Countries.动物福利应纳入教育计划吗?来自 8 个欧盟国家的中学生和大学生的态度。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;26(3):341-360. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1969931. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Dairy cattle welfare - the relative effect of legislation, industry standards and labelled niche production in five European countries.奶牛福利——立法、行业标准和五个欧洲国家的标签利基生产的相对影响。
Animal. 2023 Dec;17(12):101009. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101009. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
4
The implementation of animal welfare standards by Member Countries of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE): analysis of an OIE questionnaire.世界动物卫生组织(OIE)成员国实施动物福利标准情况:对一份OIE调查问卷的分析
Rev Sci Tech. 2009 Dec;28(3):1143-64. doi: 10.20506/rst.28.3.1959.
5
The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare.欧盟促进提高农场动物福利措施的效果。社会公众与动物科学家对动物福利的认知
Animals (Basel). 2013 Aug 14;3(3):786-807. doi: 10.3390/ani3030786.
6
Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfare.东欧消费者对动物福利的态度与信念
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;10(7):1220. doi: 10.3390/ani10071220.
7
Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.人口因素和信息来源对美国消费者动物福利认知的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):3161-73. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874.
8
Review: Livestock transport of animals in a consumer society geared towards efficiency: efficiency, animal welfare or both?综述:以效率为导向的消费型社会中动物的家畜运输:是效率、动物福利还是两者兼顾?
Animal. 2023 Aug;17 Suppl 4:100919. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100919.
9
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
10
Animal Protection in Filming in the Context of Spain.西班牙背景下电影拍摄中的动物保护
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;13(7):1144. doi: 10.3390/ani13071144.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in Quail Welfare: Integrating Environmental Enrichment, Nutrition and Genetic Advances for Improved Health and Productivity.鹌鹑福利的创新:整合环境富集、营养和遗传进展以改善健康和提高生产力。
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jul;11(4):e70424. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70424.
2
Effect of artificial insemination, ruminal incubation, and esophageal tubing on cortisol concentration in blood of lactating dairy cows.人工授精、瘤胃内培养和食管插管对泌乳奶牛血液中皮质醇浓度的影响。
JDS Commun. 2024 Nov 5;6(2):241-244. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0676. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Socio-economic analysis of the EU citizens' attitudes toward farmed animal welfare from the 2023 Eurobarometer polling survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment.消费者对现代养猪生产环境影响、安全、健康和动物福利方面的关注:一项跨国选择实验的结果。
Meat Sci. 2018 Mar;137:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
2
Perceived importance and responsibility for market-driven pig welfare: Literature review.市场驱动的生猪福利的感知重要性与责任:文献综述
Meat Sci. 2017 Mar;125:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
What We Know about the Public's Level of Concern for Farm Animal Welfare in Food Production in Developed Countries.
基于2023年欧洲晴雨表民意调查对欧盟公民对养殖动物福利态度的社会经济分析。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 14;12:1505668. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1505668. eCollection 2025.
4
Consumer animal welfare and healthy perception of fresh sausages' fiber fat replaced and elaborated with meat from non-castrated male pigs.消费者对用未阉割公猪肉替代并制作的新鲜香肠的动物福利和健康认知。
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Jul 4;12(9):6720-6734. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4278. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Combined Injection for Control of Iron-Deficiency Anemia and Coccidiosis in Piglets Decreases Stress at Management Time.用于控制仔猪缺铁性贫血和球虫病的复合注射液可降低管理期间的应激。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;14(15):2241. doi: 10.3390/ani14152241.
6
Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.为采用动物友好型饲养技术获得的猪肉支付更高价格的意愿:一项消费者意见调查。
Foods. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):4201. doi: 10.3390/foods12234201.
7
Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig.消费者对源自本土黑斯拉夫尼亚猪的腌制肉制品的偏好。
Foods. 2023 Oct 5;12(19):3666. doi: 10.3390/foods12193666.
8
Did the COVID-19 lockdown affect consumers' sustainable behaviour in food purchasing and consumption in China?新冠疫情封锁措施是否影响了中国消费者在食品购买和消费方面的可持续行为?
Food Control. 2022 Feb;132:108352. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108352. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
A survey on the use of mice, pigs, dogs and monkeys as animal models in biomedical research in Spain.西班牙关于将小鼠、猪、狗和猴子用作生物医学研究动物模型的使用情况调查。
Lab Anim Res. 2022 Jun 2;38(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s42826-022-00124-5.
10
Professional Quality of Life in Research Involving Laboratory Animals.涉及实验动物研究中的职业生活质量。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 8;11(9):2639. doi: 10.3390/ani11092639.
我们对发达国家公众对食品生产中农场动物福利关注程度的了解。
Animals (Basel). 2016 Nov 16;6(11):74. doi: 10.3390/ani6110074.
4
Outdoor stocking density in free-range laying hens: effects on behaviour and welfare.散养蛋鸡的室外饲养密度:对行为和福利的影响。
Animal. 2017 Jun;11(6):1036-1045. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002342. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
5
The Prospect of Market-Driven Improvements in Animal Welfare: Lessons from the Case of Grass Milk in Denmark.市场驱动的动物福利改善前景:丹麦鲜草奶案例的经验教训。
Animals (Basel). 2013 Jun 4;3(2):499-512. doi: 10.3390/ani3020499.
6
Prevalence of boar taint in commercial pigs from Spanish farms.西班牙农场商业猪群中公猪膻味的发生率
Meat Sci. 2016 Jan;111:177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Effect of tasting and information on consumer opinion about pig castration.品尝和信息对消费者对猪去势看法的影响。
Meat Sci. 2013 Oct;95(2):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets.在大数据集中标准化 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验的功效。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):67-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.5525. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
9
Perceptions of the importance of different welfare issues in livestock production.对家畜生产中不同福利问题重要性的认识。
Animal. 2009 Aug;3(8):1152-66. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109004479.
10
The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming.畜牧业的社会文化可持续性:对奶牛养殖社会认知的探究。
Animal. 2011 Aug;5(9):1458-66. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111000371.