• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新泽西州医院对诊断相关分组(DRG)预定价机制的短期反应

Short-term responses of hospitals to the DRG prospective pricing mechanism in New Jersey.

作者信息

Rosko M D, Broyles R W

出版信息

Med Care. 1987 Feb;25(2):88-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198702000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198702000-00002
PMID:3102862
Abstract

Short-term responses of hospitals to the New Jersey prospective payment system, which uses Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) to establish rates of compensation for all payers, were examined in this study. The sample consisted of 84 New Jersey hospitals that were subject to prospective payment and a comparison group of 76 hospitals. Hospitals comprising the comparison group located in eastern Pennsylvania, were reimbursed retrospectively. Regression equations, which included independent variables to control for market supply and demand conditions, were estimated for the cost per admission, cost per day, length of stay; and cases treated. The results indicate that increases in the cost per admission and cost per day were lower (P less than 0.05) in hospitals subject to the all payer DRG system than in those institutions that were reimbursed retrospectively. In addition, the results suggest that most of the cost savings attributed to the New Jersey DRG system are due to a reduction in the average length of stay. The paper concludes with policy implications.

摘要

本研究考察了医院对新泽西州预期支付系统的短期反应,该系统使用诊断相关分组(DRGs)来确定所有支付方的补偿率。样本包括84家接受预期支付的新泽西州医院和76家医院组成的对照组。对照组的医院位于宾夕法尼亚州东部,采用回顾性报销。针对每次住院费用、每日费用、住院时间和治疗病例数,估计了包含控制市场供需条件的自变量的回归方程。结果表明,与采用回顾性报销的机构相比,采用全支付方DRG系统的医院每次住院费用和每日费用的增幅更低(P小于0.05)。此外,结果表明,新泽西州DRG系统带来的大部分成本节约归因于平均住院时间的缩短。本文最后得出了政策含义。

相似文献

1
Short-term responses of hospitals to the DRG prospective pricing mechanism in New Jersey.新泽西州医院对诊断相关分组(DRG)预定价机制的短期反应
Med Care. 1987 Feb;25(2):88-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198702000-00002.
2
The impact of the New Jersey all-payer DRG system.新泽西州全付费者诊断相关组系统的影响。
Inquiry. 1986 Spring;23(1):67-75.
3
The impact of DRG payment on New Jersey hospitals.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费对新泽西州医院的影响。
Inquiry. 1987 Fall;24(3):212-20.
4
Economic incentives and organizational realities: managing hospitals under DRGs.经济激励与组织现实:按疾病诊断相关分组管理医院
Milbank Q. 1987;65(4):463-87.
5
Evaluating financial viability of clinical programs under prospective pricing.评估前瞻性定价下临床项目的财务可行性。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1985 Mar;11(3):81-6.
6
Efficiency, costs, and quality: the New Jersey experience revisited.效率、成本与质量:重温新泽西州的经验
Inquiry. 1990 Spring;27(1):86-96.
7
Impact of the New Jersey all-payer rate-setting system: an analysis of financial ratios.新泽西州全支付方费率设定系统的影响:财务比率分析
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1989 Spring;34(1):53-69.
8
Case-mix reimbursement and clinical management in New Jersey. The Overlook experience.新泽西州的病例组合报销与临床管理。俯瞰医院的经验。
Ind Health Care (Cambridge Ma). 1985;2:117-30.
9
How DRGs hurt academic health systems.诊断相关组(DRGs)如何损害学术医疗系统。
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Jul;193(1):1-8; discussion 8-11. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00870-5.
10
DRG prospective, "all payor systems," financial risk, and hospital cost in pulmonary medicine non CC stratified DRGs.肺科非复杂并发症分层诊断相关分组中的诊断相关分组前瞻性、“所有支付方系统”、财务风险和医院成本
Chest. 1988 Oct;94(4):855-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.855.

引用本文的文献

1
Current trends in stroke events, mortality, and case fatality in Switzerland: an epidemiologic update.瑞士中风事件、死亡率和病死率的当前趋势:流行病学最新情况
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 11;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf087.
2
Effects of a Diagnosis-Related Group Payment Reform on Length and Costs of Hospitalization in Sichuan, China: A Synthetic Control Study.中国四川按疾病诊断相关分组付费改革对住院时长和费用的影响:一项合成对照研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 14;17:1623-1637. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S463276. eCollection 2024.
3
The impact of DRG on resource consumption of inpatient with ischemic stroke.
DRG 对缺血性脑卒中患者住院资源消耗的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 7;11:1213931. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213931. eCollection 2023.
4
Do discontinuities in marginal reimbursement affect inpatient psychiatric care in Germany?边缘报销中断是否会影响德国的住院精神科护理?
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Feb;22(1):101-114. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01241-5. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Payment schemes and cost efficiency: evidence from Swiss public hospitals.支付方案与成本效益:来自瑞士公立医院的证据
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar;15(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s10754-014-9159-4. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
6
All-payer ratesetting: Down but not out.全支付方费率设定:虽受挫折但未出局。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):35-41.
7
The history of reimbursements in neurology.神经病学报销的历史。
Front Neurol. 2013 Nov 6;4:171. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00171.
8
The challenge of corporatisation: the experience of Portuguese public hospitals.企业化的挑战:葡萄牙公立医院的经验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Aug;11(4):367-81. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0198-6. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
9
DRG-based cost minimization models: applications in a hospital environment.基于疾病诊断相关分组的成本最小化模型:在医院环境中的应用
Health Care Manag Sci. 2004 Aug;7(3):197-205. doi: 10.1023/b:hcms.0000039382.05904.c3.
10
Has DRG payment influenced the technical efficiency and productivity of diagnostic technologies in Portuguese public hospitals? An empirical analysis using parametric and non-parametric methods.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付方式对葡萄牙公立医院诊断技术的技术效率和生产率有影响吗?一项使用参数和非参数方法的实证分析。
Health Care Manag Sci. 1999 May;2(2):107-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1019027509833.