Bullington Brooke W, Sata Asha, Arora Kavita Shah
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Open Access J Contracept. 2022 Aug 25;13:121-129. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S360833. eCollection 2022.
There are multi-level barriers that impact uptake of postpartum contraception and result in disparities, including clinical barriers such as provider bias. Fortunately, clinicians have direct control over their contraceptive counseling practices, and thus reducing structural barriers is actionable through high quality contraceptive counseling that equips patients with the knowledge and guidance they need to fulfill their reproductive desires. Yet, many commonly employed contraceptive counseling strategies, like One Key Question and WHO tiered contraceptive counseling, are not patient-driven, do not account for the important nuances of contraceptive choices, and are not focused specifically on the postpartum period. Given the history of eugenics and reproductive coercion in the US, supporting patient through their contraceptive decision-making process is especially vital. Additionally, contraceptive preferences vary based on patient-level factors and fluctuate over time and counseling should account for such differences. Shared contraceptive decision-making occurs when patients provide input on their values, desires, and preferences and clinicians share medical knowledge and evidence-based information without judgement. This approach is considered the most ethically sound form of counseling, as it maximizes patient autonomy. Shared decision-making also has clinical benefits, including increased patient satisfaction. In sum, shared contraceptive decision-making should be universally adopted to promote ethical, high-quality care and reproductive autonomy.
存在多种影响产后避孕措施采用并导致差异的多层次障碍,包括临床障碍,如提供者偏见。幸运的是,临床医生可以直接控制他们的避孕咨询做法,因此通过高质量的避孕咨询来减少结构性障碍是可行的,这种咨询能让患者获得实现其生殖愿望所需的知识和指导。然而,许多常用的避孕咨询策略,如“一个关键问题”和世界卫生组织分级避孕咨询,并非以患者为导向,没有考虑到避孕选择的重要细微差别,也没有特别关注产后时期。鉴于美国的优生学和生殖强制历史,在患者的避孕决策过程中给予支持尤为重要。此外,避孕偏好因患者层面的因素而异,并随时间波动,咨询应考虑到这些差异。当患者就其价值观、愿望和偏好提供意见,临床医生在不评判的情况下分享医学知识和循证信息时,就会出现共同避孕决策。这种方法被认为是最符合伦理道德的咨询形式,因为它最大限度地提高了患者的自主权。共同决策也有临床益处,包括提高患者满意度。总之,应普遍采用共同避孕决策,以促进符合伦理道德的高质量护理和生殖自主权。