• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.共同决策:产后避孕咨询的前进方向。
Open Access J Contracept. 2022 Aug 25;13:121-129. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S360833. eCollection 2022.
2
Contraceptive counseling: Shared decision on contraceptive choices.避孕咨询:关于避孕选择的共同决策。
Andrology. 2024 Oct;12(7):1525-1528. doi: 10.1111/andr.13688. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Novel Shared Decision-Making Tool Improves Contraceptive Screening and Right Care during Pregnancy in a Military Hospital: A Quality Improvement Report.新型共享决策工具提高了军医院妊娠避孕筛查和正确护理水平:一项质量改进报告。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Jan;68(1):125-134. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13403. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
4
Clinicians' Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning.临床医生对改善美国避孕咨询的看法及建议解决方案:对计划生育协会临床医生的定性半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 21;7:e47298. doi: 10.2196/47298.
5
Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.探索面向青少年的美国临床医生对其避孕咨询及共同决策使用情况的看法:一项定性研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):337-346. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12283. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
6
The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care.节育有效性分级咨询的历史和以患者为中心的计划生育护理的重要性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S873-S877. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1271. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
7
An in-depth analysis of the use of shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.深入分析在避孕咨询中使用共享决策的情况。
Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
9
Perception of coercion during contraceptive counseling among individuals with HIV.HIV 感染者在避孕咨询过程中的被强制感。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Dec;34:100791. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100791. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
10
Committee Opinion No. 419: Coercion Free Contraceptive Care.委员会意见第 419 号:非强制性避孕护理。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Sep;43(9):1107-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Arabic speaking women's experience of postpartum contraceptive counselling in Sweden.瑞典讲阿拉伯语女性的产后避孕咨询经历。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 12;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02074-2.
2
Coverage Gaps and Contraceptive Use Among Medicare Enrollees With Disabilities.医疗保险参保残疾人群体中的保险覆盖缺口与避孕措施使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517718. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17718.
3
Exploration of the Intersection between Infant Feeding and Postpartum Contraception in Western North Carolina: Perspectives of Postpartum Individuals and Providers.北卡罗来纳州西部婴儿喂养与产后避孕交叉领域的探索:产后个体及提供者的观点
South Med J. 2025 Mar;118(3):189-195. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001798.
4
Proposed changes to framework to assess contraceptive autonomy based on phased in-depth interviews in northwest Tanzania.基于在坦桑尼亚西北部进行的分阶段深入访谈,对评估避孕自主权框架提出的修改建议。
Reprod Health. 2025 Feb 15;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-01963-w.
5
Association Between Preterm Birth and Fulfillment of Desired Permanent Contraception.早产与期望的永久性避孕措施达成之间的关联
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Mar;29(3):396-404. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04063-0. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
6
Patient and obstetrician-gynecologist perspectives on considering long-acting reversible contraception for postpartum patients who desire permanent contraception.患者与妇产科医生对于为有永久性避孕需求的产后患者考虑长效可逆避孕方法的观点。
Contraception. 2025 Mar;143:110781. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110781. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
7
Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.探索面向青少年的美国临床医生对其避孕咨询及共同决策使用情况的看法:一项定性研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):337-346. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12283. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
8
"It Means Being Safe, Having Power over One's Body": Black Female Adolescent Experiences with Reproductive Health Counseling in Primary Care.“这意味着安全,意味着拥有对自身身体的掌控权”:初级保健中黑人女性青少年的生殖健康咨询经历。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2024 Aug;37(4):389-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2024.01.165. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
Prevalence of non-preferred family planning methods among reproductive-aged women in Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional, population-based study.布基纳法索育龄妇女中不首选计划生育方法的流行情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2174244. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2174244.

本文引用的文献

1
Fulfillment of Desired Postpartum Permanent Contraception: a Health Disparities Issue.实现理想的产后永久性避孕:一个健康不平等问题。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Sep;29(9):2620-2624. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00912-3. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
2
Balancing enhanced contraceptive access with risk of reproductive injustice: A United States comparative case study.平衡增加避孕措施可及性与生殖不公正风险:一项美国比较案例研究。
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
3
Facilitators of and Barriers to Successful Implementation of the One Key Question Pregnancy Intention Screening Tool.成功实施“一个关键问题妊娠意愿筛查工具”的促进因素和障碍
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Mar 8;3(1):326-334. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0100. eCollection 2022.
4
Association of the affordable care act Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and early postpartum pregnancy.平价医疗法案医疗补助扩大计划与产后避孕措施使用和产后早期妊娠的关联。
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
5
Addressing fluidity in contraceptive decision-making: a key component of patient-centered contraceptive counseling.应对避孕决策中的灵活性:以患者为中心的避孕咨询的关键组成部分。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):99-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.031. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Quantitative and qualitative impact of One Key Question on primary care providers' contraceptive counseling at routine preventive health visits.“一个关键问题”对基层医疗服务提供者在常规预防性健康检查中进行避孕咨询的定量和定性影响。
Contraception. 2022 May;109:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
7
Examining the association between short interpregnancy interval births and the type and timing of postpartum long acting reversible contraception.探讨短孕期生育间隔与产后长效可逆避孕措施的类型和时机之间的关联。
Contraception. 2022 Aug;112:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Postpartum Contraceptive Decision-Making of Parous Teens-A Qualitative Study.产后青少年避孕决策——一项定性研究。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022 Jun;35(3):329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
9
Changing lives, dynamic plans: Prospective assessment of 12-month changes in pregnancy timing intentions and personal circumstances using data from HER Salt Lake.改变生活,充满活力的计划:利用 HER Salt Lake 数据对怀孕时间意向和个人情况进行 12 个月变化的前瞻性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257411. eCollection 2021.
10
Changes in pregnancy desire after a pregnancy scare in a random sample of young adult women in a Michigan county.密歇根县随机抽样的年轻成年女性在经历一次妊娠恐慌后妊娠愿望的变化。
Contraception. 2021 Oct;104(4):388-393. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

共同决策:产后避孕咨询的前进方向。

Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.

作者信息

Bullington Brooke W, Sata Asha, Arora Kavita Shah

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.

出版信息

Open Access J Contracept. 2022 Aug 25;13:121-129. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S360833. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S360833
PMID:36046227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9423116/
Abstract

There are multi-level barriers that impact uptake of postpartum contraception and result in disparities, including clinical barriers such as provider bias. Fortunately, clinicians have direct control over their contraceptive counseling practices, and thus reducing structural barriers is actionable through high quality contraceptive counseling that equips patients with the knowledge and guidance they need to fulfill their reproductive desires. Yet, many commonly employed contraceptive counseling strategies, like One Key Question and WHO tiered contraceptive counseling, are not patient-driven, do not account for the important nuances of contraceptive choices, and are not focused specifically on the postpartum period. Given the history of eugenics and reproductive coercion in the US, supporting patient through their contraceptive decision-making process is especially vital. Additionally, contraceptive preferences vary based on patient-level factors and fluctuate over time and counseling should account for such differences. Shared contraceptive decision-making occurs when patients provide input on their values, desires, and preferences and clinicians share medical knowledge and evidence-based information without judgement. This approach is considered the most ethically sound form of counseling, as it maximizes patient autonomy. Shared decision-making also has clinical benefits, including increased patient satisfaction. In sum, shared contraceptive decision-making should be universally adopted to promote ethical, high-quality care and reproductive autonomy.

摘要

存在多种影响产后避孕措施采用并导致差异的多层次障碍,包括临床障碍,如提供者偏见。幸运的是,临床医生可以直接控制他们的避孕咨询做法,因此通过高质量的避孕咨询来减少结构性障碍是可行的,这种咨询能让患者获得实现其生殖愿望所需的知识和指导。然而,许多常用的避孕咨询策略,如“一个关键问题”和世界卫生组织分级避孕咨询,并非以患者为导向,没有考虑到避孕选择的重要细微差别,也没有特别关注产后时期。鉴于美国的优生学和生殖强制历史,在患者的避孕决策过程中给予支持尤为重要。此外,避孕偏好因患者层面的因素而异,并随时间波动,咨询应考虑到这些差异。当患者就其价值观、愿望和偏好提供意见,临床医生在不评判的情况下分享医学知识和循证信息时,就会出现共同避孕决策。这种方法被认为是最符合伦理道德的咨询形式,因为它最大限度地提高了患者的自主权。共同决策也有临床益处,包括提高患者满意度。总之,应普遍采用共同避孕决策,以促进符合伦理道德的高质量护理和生殖自主权。