Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jul;123(1):57-63.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
In 2004, the landmark Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) study demonstrated that most patients can achieve asthma control through sustained treatment and that adding a long-acting β-adrenoreceptor agonist to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is more effective than ICS alone in this regard. Definitions of asthma control have since evolved, and the consequent implications for the GOAL study findings are unclear.
To evaluate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol and fluticasone propionate alone in achieving and maintaining asthma control, as derived from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2016 report.
In total, 3416 patients were stratified by prior medication (ICS-naive [stratum 1], low-dose ICS [stratum 2], or medium-dose ICS [stratum 3]) and randomized to receive fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone propionate. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving well-controlled or partly controlled asthma; secondary end points included the proportion of patients achieving well-controlled asthma. Control was evaluated during the last 4 weeks of each dose titration.
In all strata, more patients achieved well-controlled or partly controlled asthma with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol vs fluticasone propionate alone (stratum 1: 91% vs 85%; P = .003; stratum 2: 86% vs 82%; P = .07; and stratum 3: 76% vs 66%; P < .001), as well as patients with well-controlled asthma (stratum 1: 64% vs 56%; P = .005; stratum 2: 59% vs 41%; P < .001; and stratum 3: 40% vs 22%; P < .001).
A markedly higher proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma in each stratum achieved control according to GINA 2016 criteria compared with the original study criteria. The proportion of patients achieving control remained greater with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol than with fluticasone propionate alone.
2004 年,具有里程碑意义的“获得最佳哮喘控制(GOAL)”研究表明,大多数患者通过持续治疗可以实现哮喘控制,并且在这方面,将长效β-肾上腺素能受体激动剂添加到吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)中比单独使用 ICS 更有效。此后,哮喘控制的定义不断发展,GOAL 研究结果的相应影响尚不清楚。
根据全球哮喘倡议(GINA)2016 年报告,评估丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗以及丙酸氟替卡松单独治疗在实现和维持哮喘控制方面的疗效。
共有 3416 名患者根据既往用药情况(ICS 初治[第 1 层]、低剂量 ICS[第 2 层]或中剂量 ICS[第 3 层])分层,并随机接受丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗或丙酸氟替卡松治疗。主要终点是达到良好控制或部分控制哮喘的患者比例;次要终点包括达到良好控制哮喘的患者比例。在每个剂量滴定的最后 4 周内评估控制情况。
在所有分层中,与单独使用丙酸氟替卡松相比,使用丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗的患者达到良好控制或部分控制哮喘的比例更高(第 1 层:91%比 85%;P=.003;第 2 层:86%比 82%;P=.07;第 3 层:76%比 66%;P <.001),达到良好控制哮喘的患者比例也更高(第 1 层:64%比 56%;P=.005;第 2 层:59%比 41%;P <.001;第 3 层:40%比 22%;P <.001)。
与原始研究标准相比,根据 GINA 2016 标准,每个分层中未经控制的哮喘患者中有明显更高比例的患者达到控制。与单独使用丙酸氟替卡松相比,使用丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗的患者达到控制的比例仍然更高。