Suppr超能文献

因子分析区分特发性和干扰素-α诱导性抑郁的临床表型。

Factor analyses differentiate clinical phenotypes of idiopathic and interferon-alpha-induced depression.

机构信息

Immunopsychiatry Research Clinic, Sussex Education Centre, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton BN3 7HZ, United Kingdom; Department of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton BN1 9RR, United Kingdom.

Immunopsychiatry Research Clinic, Sussex Education Centre, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton BN3 7HZ, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Brain Behav Immun. 2019 Aug;80:519-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.035. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

The discovery that prolonged administration of interferon-alpha (a pro-inflammatory cytokine) readily precipitates depressive symptoms has played a key role in development of the inflammation theory of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, it remains unclear whether the clinical phenotype of patients with inflammation-associated depression significantly overlaps with, or can be distinguished from that of patients with 'idiopathic' depression. Here we explored the Hamilton depression scale factor structure of 172 patients undergoing interferon-alpha treatment for hepatitis-C at the point of transition to a depressive episode of DSM IV defined major depression severity. The resulting factor structure was first compared with a model derived from 6 previous studies of 'idiopathic' MDD (Cole et al., 2004). This confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the factor structure of HAMD scores in our interferon-alpha treated cohort did not plausibly fit that previously described for 'idiopathic' MDD. Instead, subsequent exploratory factor analysis revealed a distinct four factor model with a novel primary factor grouping cognitive symptoms of depression and anxiety (HAMD items 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 15). The second sleep disorder factor (items 4, 5, 6) replicated previous findings in 'idiopathic' depression. A third and unique factor grouped somatic symptoms and function (items 7, 12, 13, 14 and item 1). The final factor (also common in idiopathic depression studies), grouped gastrointestinal symptoms and weight loss (items 12 and 16). Severe depression items (3, 8, and 17) were excluded from analysis due to very low variance. At transition, interferon-alpha induced major depressive episodes therefore appears to have more associated anxiety features that covary with depressed mood than classical or 'idiopathic' MDD and a low likelihood of severe features such as suicidal ideation. Identification of this clinical phenotype may help identify patients with an inflammatory depression etiology and support the development of more effective and personalized therapies.

摘要

干扰素-α(一种促炎细胞因子)长期给药极易引发抑郁症状的发现,在重度抑郁症(MDD)的炎症理论发展中发挥了关键作用。然而,目前尚不清楚炎症相关抑郁症患者的临床表型是否与“特发性”抑郁症患者的表型显著重叠或可以区分。在这里,我们在患有丙型肝炎的患者开始出现 DSM-IV 定义的重度抑郁症发作时,研究了 172 名接受干扰素-α治疗的患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)因子结构。首先将该因子结构与来自 6 项先前的“特发性”MDD 研究(Cole 等人,2004)的模型进行比较。这种验证性因子分析表明,我们的干扰素-α治疗队列中 HAMD 评分的因子结构不太可能与之前描述的“特发性”MDD 相符。相反,随后的探索性因子分析揭示了一个具有独特的四因子模型,该模型具有新颖的主要因子分组,将抑郁和焦虑的认知症状(HAMD 项目 1、2、9、10、11、15)分组。第二个睡眠障碍因子(项目 4、5、6)复制了“特发性”抑郁症中的先前发现。第三个独特的因子分组了躯体症状和功能(项目 7、12、13、14 和项目 1)。最后一个因子(在“特发性”抑郁症研究中也很常见)分组了胃肠道症状和体重减轻(项目 12 和 16)。由于方差非常低,严重抑郁项目(3、8 和 17)未纳入分析。因此,干扰素-α诱导的重度抑郁症发作在发病时可能具有更多与抑郁情绪相关的焦虑特征,与经典或“特发性”MDD 相比,其严重特征(如自杀意念)的可能性较低。识别这种临床表型可能有助于识别具有炎症性抑郁病因的患者,并支持开发更有效和个性化的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验