Foley Éimear M, Parkinson Joel T, Kappelmann Nils, Khandaker Golam M
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021 Aug 5;8:100079. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100079. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Whether depressed patients with evidence of inflammation are more appropriate candidates for immunotherapies is being tested in several clinical trials, which are selecting patients based on elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and inflammation-related symptoms. However, studies of the clinical and phenotypic profile of depressed patients with elevated CRP are relatively scarce. We have investigated detailed clinical characteristics of 84 depressed patients, grouped as those with (CRP≥3 mg/L) and without (CRP<3 mg/L) inflammation. All patients met the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision criteria for current depressive episode and had somatic symptoms of depression. We report that depressed patients with inflammation are more likely to be older (=0.04), have higher body mass index (<0.01), and be on non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants (=0.04). After adjusting for potential confounders, the inflammation group had higher depression severity (adjusted mean difference, 8.82; 95% CI, 3.91-13.72), somatic symptoms (adjusted mean difference, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.58-4.92), state anxiety (adjusted mean difference, 9.25; 95% CI, 3.82-14.67), perceived stress (adjusted mean difference, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.98-7.18), and fatigue (adjusted mean difference, 9.71; 95% CI, 3.09-6.33), but not anhedonia. The inflamed group also had poorer quality of life (adjusted mean difference, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.32-0.05). At individual depressive symptom level, the inflammation group had increased guilty feelings (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.28; 95% CI, 2.09-31.17), pessimism (adjusted OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.53-22.73), concentration difficulties (adjusted OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.32-19.02), and indecisiveness (adjusted OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.15-18.54). Our findings highlight the clinical features associated with inflammation in depressed patients with somatic symptoms, including poor quality of life, supporting the need for intervention targeting this group. These results could also aid patient and outcome selection in future clinical trials testing immunotherapies in depression. Replication of these findings in larger samples is required.
炎症证据的抑郁症患者是否更适合接受免疫治疗正在多项临床试验中进行测试,这些试验根据C反应蛋白(CRP)升高和炎症相关症状来选择患者。然而,关于CRP升高的抑郁症患者的临床和表型特征的研究相对较少。我们调查了84名抑郁症患者的详细临床特征,将其分为有炎症(CRP≥3mg/L)和无炎症(CRP<3mg/L)两组。所有患者均符合国际疾病分类第10版当前抑郁发作标准且有抑郁的躯体症状。我们报告,有炎症的抑郁症患者更可能年龄较大(P=0.04)、体重指数较高(P<0.01)且正在服用非选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂类抗抑郁药(P=0.04)。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,炎症组的抑郁严重程度更高(调整后平均差异为8.82;95%置信区间为3.91-13.72)、躯体症状更严重(调整后平均差异为3.25;95%置信区间为1.58-4.92)、状态焦虑更严重(调整后平均差异为9.25;95%置信区间为3.82-14.67)、感知压力更大(调整后平均差异为4.58;95%置信区间为1.98-7.18)以及疲劳更严重(调整后平均差异为9.71;95%置信区间为3.09-6.33),但快感缺失不明显。炎症组的生活质量也较差(调整后平均差异为-0.18;95%置信区间为-0.32至-0.05)。在个体抑郁症状水平上,炎症组的内疚感增加(调整后比值比[OR]为7.28;95%置信区间为2.09-31.17)、悲观情绪增加(调整后OR为5.38;95%置信区间为1.53-22.7;注意力难以集中(调整后OR为4.56;95%置信区间为1.32-19.02)以及优柔寡断(调整后OR为4.21;95%置信区间为1.15-18.54)。我们的研究结果突出了有躯体症状的抑郁症患者中与炎症相关的临床特征,包括生活质量差,这支持了针对该群体进行干预的必要性。这些结果也有助于未来抑郁症免疫治疗临床试验中的患者和结果选择。需要在更大样本中重复这些研究结果。