GRADE guidelines for environmental and occupational health: A new series of articles in Environment International.
作者信息
Morgan Rebecca L, Beverly Brandy, Ghersi Davina, Schünemann Holger J, Rooney Andrew A, Whaley Paul, Zhu Yong-Guan, Thayer Kristina A
机构信息
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C14, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop K2-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
出版信息
Environ Int. 2019 Jul;128:11-12. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
GRADE guidelines for environmental and occupational health: A new series of articles in Environment International.《环境与职业健康的GRADE指南》：《国际环境》杂志的一系列新文章
Environ Int. 2019 Jul;128:11-12. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
2
Occupational therapist led environmental assessment and modification to prevent falls: Review of current practice in an Australian rural health service.职业治疗师主导的环境评估与改造以预防跌倒：澳大利亚农村卫生服务机构的当前实践综述
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Jun;66(3):347-361. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12560. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Public, environmental, and occupational health research activity in Arab countries: bibliometric, citation, and collaboration analysis.阿拉伯国家的公共、环境和职业卫生研究活动：文献计量学、引文和合作分析。
Arch Public Health. 2015 Jan 5;73(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-73-1. eCollection 2015.
4
[Japan Environment Health and Children's Study Publications from the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan].[日本职业与环境卫生大学的日本环境健康与儿童研究出版物]
J UOEH. 2020;42(3):275-279. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.42.275.
5
Occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics: a systematic review.职业接触挥发性麻醉剂：系统评价。
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Apr;66(3):202-7. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv193. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
Development of an ISO 9000-compatible occupational health standard--II: defining the potential benefits and open issues.制定与ISO 9000兼容的职业健康标准——II：界定潜在益处和未决问题。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Apr;57(4):387-91. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014945.
9
GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.GRADE指南40：环境与职业健康的GRADE证据到决策框架
Environ Int. 2025 Mar;197:109314. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109314. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
10
Towards a framework for systematic reviews of the prevalence of exposure to environmental and occupational risk factors.针对环境和职业风险因素暴露的普遍性进行系统综述的框架。
Environ Health. 2022 Jul 6;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00878-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Nutrition users' guides: systematic reviews part 1 -structured guide for methodological assessment, interpretation and application of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of non-randomised nutritional epidemiology studies.营养用户指南：系统评价 第1部分——非随机营养流行病学研究系统评价和荟萃分析方法学评估、解读及应用的结构化指南
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Aug 28;7(2):e000835. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000835. eCollection 2024.
2
Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children's health: a methodological survey.系统评价空气污染暴露与生殖和儿童健康的证据体评价系统：方法学调查。
Environ Health. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01069-z.
3
Association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全氟和多氟烷基物质与高血压风险的关联：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;11:1173101. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1173101. eCollection 2023.
4
Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper.环境卫生系统评价中的生物学合理性：一份GRADE概念文件。
Environ Int. 2022 Apr;162:107109. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107109. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Assessing the Risk of Respiratory-Related Healthcare Visits Associated with Wildfire Smoke Exposure in Children 0-18 Years Old: A Systematic Review.评估 0-18 岁儿童暴露于野火烟雾与呼吸相关的医疗保健就诊风险：系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;18(16):8799. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168799.
6
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A protocol for a systematic review of human observational studies.射频场暴露对普通人群和职业人群癌症风险的影响：一项关于人类观察性研究的系统评价方案
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106828. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106828. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
7
Association of working conditions including digital technology use and systemic inflammation among employees: study protocol for a systematic review.工作条件（包括数字技术的使用）与员工系统性炎症之间的关联：一项系统综述的研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 28;9(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01463-x.
本文引用的文献
1
GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations.GRADE 指南：22. 从测试准确性到患者重要结局和推荐的测试和策略的 GRADE 方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE.暴露非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具：GRADE 背景下应用的用户指南。
Environ Int. 2019 Jan;122:168-184. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes.确定PECO：一个用于提出好问题以探究环境及其他暴露因素与健康结果之间关联的框架。
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):1027-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
4
Evaluation of the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and the 'target experiment' concept in studies of exposures: Rationale and preliminary instrument development.干预措施的非随机研究中偏倚风险评估（ROBINS-I）和暴露研究中的“目标试验”概念：原理和初步工具开发。
Environ Int. 2018 Nov;120:382-387. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
5
WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis.世卫组织/国际劳工组织与工作相关的疾病和伤害负担：系统性综述职业暴露于粉尘和/或纤维以及职业暴露于粉尘和/或纤维对尘肺病影响的议定书。
Environ Int. 2018 Oct;119:174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies.通过评估临床前动物研究证据的确定性来辅助医疗决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0187271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187271. eCollection 2018.
7
A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals.一种针对内分泌干扰化学物质的系统评价与综合评估（SYRINA）的提议框架。
Environ Health. 2016 Jul 14;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6.
8
Application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to the evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity of triclosan.将导航指南系统评价方法应用于三氯生发育和生殖毒性证据的研究。
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:716-28. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 May 5.
9
Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency.使用 GRADE 对不同紧急程度的健康问题进行回应。
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:585-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.027. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?解读GRADE证据的确定性水平或质量：面向统计学家的GRADE，是考虑综述信息规模还是较少强调不精确性？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
Zotero 插件