Suppr超能文献

肠外营养(PN)与肠内营养(EN)在成年危重症患者中的获益比较:有何证据?文献复习。

The Benefits of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Versus Enteral Nutrition (EN) Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: What is the Evidence? A Literature Review.

机构信息

Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):615-626. doi: 10.1177/0885066619843782. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

Abstract

Malnutrition is frequently seen among patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence shows that optimal nutritional support can lead to better clinical outcomes. Recent clinical trials debate over the efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) over parenteral nutrition (PN). Multiple trials have studied the impact of EN versus PN in terms of health-care cost and clinical outcomes (including functional status, cost, infectious complications, mortality risk, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and mechanical ventilation duration). The aim of this review is to address the question: In critically ill adult patients requiring nutrition support, does EN compared to PN favorably impact clinical outcomes and health-care costs?

摘要

营养不良在重症监护病房的患者中很常见。有证据表明,最佳的营养支持可以带来更好的临床结局。最近的临床试验就肠内营养(EN)与肠外营养(PN)的疗效展开了争论。多项试验研究了 EN 与 PN 在医疗保健成本和临床结局(包括功能状态、成本、感染并发症、死亡率风险、住院和重症监护病房停留时间以及机械通气持续时间)方面的影响。本综述的目的是解决以下问题:在需要营养支持的重症成年患者中,与 PN 相比,EN 是否对临床结局和医疗保健成本有有利影响?

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验