• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践培训对人口统计学因素与旁观者实施心肺复苏术自我效能感之间关系的中介分析。

A mediation analysis of the effect of practical training on the relationship between demographic factors, and bystanders' self-efficacy in CPR performance.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0215432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215432. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215432
PMID:31034486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6488056/
Abstract

This study examined the mediation effect of practical training on the relationship of demographic characteristics with bystander self-efficacy in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance. We used nationwide, cross-sectional data from the Korea Community Health Survey and analyzed 25,082 Korean adults who participated in CPR training within the last 2 years. A mediation model was applied to explore the pathway from demographic characteristics via CPR practical training to self-efficacy in CPR performance. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to examine each path in the mediation model. Of the 25,082 respondents recently trained, 19,168 (76.8%) practiced on a manikin. In the unadjusted CPR practical training model, the demographic characteristics associated with high self-efficacy in CPR performance were male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 2.54); 50s age group (OR = 1.30); college or more (OR = 1.39) and high school education (OR = 1.32); white collar (OR = 1.24) and soldier (OR = 2.98) occupational statuses. The characteristics associated with low self-efficacy were 30s age group (OR = 0.69) and capital (OR = 0.79) and metropolitan (OR = 0.84) areas of residence (p < 0.05). In the adjusted CPR practical training model, the significance of the relationship between demographics and self-efficacy in CPR performance decreased in male gender, 30s age group, college or more and high school education, and soldier occupational status (i.e., partial mediation), and disappeared in metropolitan residents (i.e., complete mediation). The degree of the mediating effect of CPR practical training on self-efficacy differed for each demographic characteristic. Thus, individualized educational strategies considering recipient demographics are needed for effective practice-based CPR training and improving bystander CPR performance.

摘要

本研究考察了实践培训对心肺复苏术(CPR)表现中旁观者自我效能与人口统计学特征之间关系的中介效应。我们使用了全国性的横断面数据,即韩国社区健康调查,并分析了在过去 2 年内参加过 CPR 培训的 25082 名韩国成年人。采用中介模型探讨了从人口统计学特征到 CPR 实践培训再到 CPR 表现自我效能的途径。采用多元逻辑回归分析检验了中介模型中的每条路径。在最近接受培训的 25082 名受访者中,有 19168 人(76.8%)在模型上进行了实践。在未调整的 CPR 实践培训模型中,与 CPR 表现自我效能较高相关的人口统计学特征是男性(优势比[OR] = 2.54);50 多岁年龄组(OR = 1.30);大学及以上学历(OR = 1.39)和高中学历(OR = 1.32);白领(OR = 1.24)和军人(OR = 2.98)职业状态。与自我效能较低相关的特征是 30 多岁年龄组(OR = 0.69)和首都(OR = 0.79)以及大都市(OR = 0.84)地区的居住者(p < 0.05)。在调整后的 CPR 实践培训模型中,人口统计学特征与 CPR 表现自我效能之间的关系在男性、30 多岁年龄组、大学及以上学历和高中学历以及军人职业状态方面的重要性降低(即部分中介),而在大都市居民方面则消失(即完全中介)。CPR 实践培训对自我效能的中介效应程度因人口统计学特征而异。因此,需要根据接受者的人口统计学特征制定个性化的教育策略,以实现有效的基于实践的 CPR 培训和提高旁观者的 CPR 表现。

相似文献

1
A mediation analysis of the effect of practical training on the relationship between demographic factors, and bystanders' self-efficacy in CPR performance.实践培训对人口统计学因素与旁观者实施心肺复苏术自我效能感之间关系的中介分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0215432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215432. eCollection 2019.
2
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation training experience and self-efficacy of age and gender group: a nationwide community survey.旁观者心肺复苏培训经历及不同年龄和性别组的自我效能:一项全国性社区调查
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
3
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Disparities in the United States.美国心肺复苏培训的差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 17;6(5):e006124. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006124.
4
Public awareness and self-efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-level analysis.社区心肺复苏的公众意识和自我效能与院外心脏骤停的结局:一项多层次分析。
Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
CPR training and CPR performance: do CPR-trained bystanders perform CPR?心肺复苏培训与心肺复苏操作:接受过心肺复苏培训的旁观者会实施心肺复苏吗?
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;13(6):596-601. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.021. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
6
Australia's awareness of cardiac arrest and rates of CPR training: results from the Heart Foundation's HeartWatch survey.澳大利亚对心脏骤停的认知和心肺复苏培训率:心脏基金会“心脏观察”调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e033722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033722.
7
Influence of nationwide policy on citizens' awareness and willingness to perform bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.全国性政策对公民意识和实施旁观者心肺复苏意愿的影响。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):889-94. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
8
Public knowledge, attitudes and willingness regarding bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A nationwide survey in Taiwan.公众对旁观者心肺复苏术的认知、态度和意愿:台湾的一项全国性调查。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Feb;118(2):572-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
Regions With Low Rates of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Have Lower Rates of CPR Training in Victoria, Australia.在澳大利亚维多利亚州,旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)实施率较低的地区,CPR培训率也较低。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 5;6(6):e005972. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005972.
10
Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls and public awareness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities: A multilevel analysis.院外心脏骤停的识别和社区公众对心肺复苏的认知:一项多层次分析。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
First aid self-efficacy: a scale adaptation and psychometric properties.急救自我效能感:量表改编及心理测量特性
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22486-w.
2
The effect of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative compliance on the association between mode of birth and breastfeeding initiation in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡爱婴医院倡议的合规性对分娩方式与母乳喂养开始之间关联的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07135-9.
3
Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals' stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes towards bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Results from a cross-sectional general population survey.旁观者心肺复苏态度:来自横断面一般人群调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193391. eCollection 2018.
2
Influence of Gender on the Performance of Cardiopulmonary Rescue Teams: A Randomized, Prospective Simulator Study.性别对心肺复苏团队表现的影响:一项随机、前瞻性模拟研究
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):1184-1191. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002375.
3
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Clustered and Associated With Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics: A Geospatial Analysis of Kent County, Michigan.
美国福音派在新冠疫情期间反对强制戴口罩立场背后的政治与教育动态
Soc Sci Res. 2025 Jan;125:103100. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103100. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
旁观者心肺复苏存在聚集现象且与邻里社会经济特征相关:密歇根州肯特县的地理空间分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;24(8):930-939. doi: 10.1111/acem.13222. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Evaluating Barriers to Bystander CPR among Laypersons before and after Compression-only CPR Training.评估仅进行胸外按压心肺复苏培训前后非专业人员实施旁观者心肺复苏的障碍
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):662-669. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308605. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
5
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Civic Duty.旁观者心肺复苏:一项公民义务。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Feb;17(2):51-53. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1265173.
6
Are sociodemographic characteristics associated with spatial variation in the incidence of OHCA and bystander CPR rates? A population-based observational study in Victoria, Australia.社会人口学特征是否与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)发病率及旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)率的空间差异相关?澳大利亚维多利亚州一项基于人群的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 7;6(11):e012434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012434.
7
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation training experience and self-efficacy of age and gender group: a nationwide community survey.旁观者心肺复苏培训经历及不同年龄和性别组的自我效能:一项全国性社区调查
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
8
Public awareness and self-efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-level analysis.社区心肺复苏的公众意识和自我效能与院外心脏骤停的结局:一项多层次分析。
Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Part 14: Education: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第14部分:教育:2015年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S561-73. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000268.
10
Korea Community Health Survey Data Profiles.韩国社区健康调查数据概况。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2015 Jun;6(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.phrp.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 10.