Leiria Tiago Luiz Luz, Branchi Mauricio, Sant'anna Roberto Tofani, Almeida Eduardo Dytz, Pires Leonardo Martins, Kruse Marcelo Lapa, Essebag Vidal, Saffi Marco Aurélio Lumertz, de Lima Gustavo Glotz
Electrophysiology Department of the Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Electrophysiology Department of the Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019 Sep-Oct;19(5):178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
Common clinical teaching, for invasive electrophysiology, is that if the first year fellow cannulates the coronary sinus (CS) in his first attempt, the arrhythmia is more likely to be atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). This general perception has not yet been clinically tested. We evaluated this theory in prospective patients undergoing an electrophysiological study (EPS) for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).
Cohort study. CS ease of cannulation (CSCS) was graded as: 1) 1st year fellow cannulates in first attempt; 2) 1st year fellow needs more than one attempt or maneuver to cannulate the CS; 3) staff physician cannulates in first attempt after the fellow was unsuccessful; 4) staff physician requires more than one maneuver to cannulate the CS; 5) staff physician judges that the cannulation process was extremely difficult.
Of the 1361 patients undergoing EPS in our institution, 165 were selected. Age was 49 ± 15 years. AVNRT occurred in 77.6%, atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) in 15.1% and atrial tachycardia (AT) in 7.3% of cases. The CSCS = 1 was more prevalent in AVNRT, 89% versus 68% AVRT and 58.3% of AT (P = 0.0005). Patients with CSCS = 1 have a higher chance of the PSVT being AVNRT (odds ratio: 4.41; 95CI: 1.84-10.56; P = 0.0009).
The CSCS predicts the likelihood of the induced PSVT being AVNRT as compared to AVRT and AT. More studies are required to try to associate this finding to clinical patient characteristics to create a score for PSVT mechanism prediction.
对于侵入性电生理学的常见临床教学观点是,如果第一年的住院医师首次尝试就能成功插入冠状窦(CS),则心律失常更可能是房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)。这种普遍认知尚未经过临床验证。我们在因阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)接受电生理研究(EPS)的前瞻性患者中对这一理论进行了评估。
队列研究。冠状窦插管难易程度(CSCS)分为:1)第一年住院医师首次尝试即成功插管;2)第一年住院医师需要多次尝试或采取其他操作才能插入冠状窦;3)住院医师插管失败后,主治医师首次尝试成功;4)主治医师需要多次操作才能插入冠状窦;5)主治医师判断插管过程极其困难。
在我们机构接受EPS的1361例患者中,选取了165例。年龄为49±15岁。77.6%的病例为AVNRT,15.1%为房室折返性心动过速(AVRT),7.3%为房性心动过速(AT)。CSCS = 1在AVNRT中更为常见,分别为89%、AVRT为68%、AT为58.3%(P = 0.0005)。CSCS = 1的患者PSVT为AVNRT的可能性更高(优势比:4.41;95%置信区间:1.84 - 10.56;P = 0.0009)。
与AVRT和AT相比,CSCS可预测诱发的PSVT为AVNRT的可能性。需要更多研究将这一发现与临床患者特征相关联,以创建一个用于预测PSVT机制的评分系统。