Ezhumalai Babu, Satheesh Santhosh, Anantha Ajith, Pakkirisamy Gobu, Balachander Jayaraman, Selvaraj Raja J
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research.
Cardiol J. 2014;21(3):273-8. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0088. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
Coronary sinus (CS) has been shown to be larger in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We sought to determine if echocardiographically measured CS diameter can help identify the mechanism of tachycardia in patients with narrow complex tachycardia without preexcitation before the invasive electrophysiology study.
Forty four patients with documented narrow complex, short RP tachycardia who were scheduled for an electrophysiology study were included. Based on the electrophysiology study, patients were divided into those with AVNRT and those with a concealed accessory pathway and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). Proximal CS diameter (CSp) measured at the ostium and mid CS diameter (CSm) 1 cm distal to the ostium using transthoracic echocardiography.
CSp was significantly larger in patients with AVNRT than AVRT (14.1 ± 5 vs. 9.9 ± 2 mm, p < 0.0001). CSm diameter was not significantly different between the two groups. A cut-off of CSp > 11.2 mm identified AVNRT with a sensitivity of 92.6% and specificity of 76.9%. CSp was a better discriminant (AUC 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-0.97) compared to age (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.87) or tachycardia rate (AUC 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.76).
Echocardiographic measurement of the diameter of CS ostium can help in identifying the mechanism of the tachycardia before the invasive electrophysiology study.
已证实房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者的冠状静脉窦(CS)更大。我们试图确定经超声心动图测量的CS直径是否有助于在进行有创电生理研究之前识别无预激的窄QRS波心动过速患者的心动过速机制。
纳入44例记录有窄QRS波、短RP心动过速且计划进行电生理研究的患者。根据电生理研究,将患者分为AVNRT组和隐匿性旁路及房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)组。使用经胸超声心动图测量CS开口处的近端CS直径(CSp)和开口处远端1 cm处的CS中间直径(CSm)。
AVNRT患者的CSp显著大于AVRT患者(14.1±5 vs. 9.9±2 mm,p<0.0001)。两组之间的CSm直径无显著差异。CSp>11.2 mm的截断值可识别AVNRT,敏感性为92.6%,特异性为76.9%。与年龄(曲线下面积[AUC]0.74,95%可信区间[CI]0.58 - 0.87)或心动过速心率(AUC 0.60,95%CI 0.44 - 0.76)相比,CSp是更好的判别指标(AUC 0.89,95%CI 0.75 - 0.97)。
经超声心动图测量CS开口直径有助于在进行有创电生理研究之前识别心动过速机制。