Werner Reichardt Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany.
Elife. 2019 Apr 30;8:e42512. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42512.
We subjectively perceive our visual field with high fidelity, yet peripheral distortions can go unnoticed and peripheral objects can be difficult to identify (crowding). Prior work showed that humans could not discriminate images synthesised to match the responses of a mid-level ventral visual stream model when information was averaged in receptive fields with a scaling of about half their retinal eccentricity. This result implicated ventral visual area V2, approximated 'Bouma's Law' of crowding, and has subsequently been interpreted as a link between crowding zones, receptive field scaling, and our perceptual experience. However, this experiment never assessed natural images. We find that humans can easily discriminate real and model-generated images at V2 scaling, requiring scales at least as small as V1 receptive fields to generate metamers. We speculate that explaining why scenes look as they do may require incorporating segmentation and global organisational constraints in addition to local pooling.
我们主观地以高保真度感知我们的视野,但周边扭曲可能会被忽略,周边物体可能难以识别(拥挤)。先前的工作表明,当信息在约为其视网膜偏心度一半的感受野中平均时,人类无法区分与中等级别腹侧视觉流模型的响应匹配的合成图像。该结果暗示了腹侧视觉区域 V2,接近“Bouma 定律”的拥挤,并且随后被解释为拥挤区域、感受野缩放和我们的感知体验之间的联系。然而,该实验从未评估过自然图像。我们发现,人类可以轻松地区分 V2 缩放的真实和模型生成的图像,需要至少与 V1 感受野一样小的比例来生成同色异谱。我们推测,要解释为什么场景看起来如此,可能需要除了局部池化之外,还将分割和全局组织约束纳入其中。