• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者特征和心理需求对1型或2型糖尿病成人患者糖尿病移动应用可用性的影响:交叉随机试验

Influence of Patient Characteristics and Psychological Needs on Diabetes Mobile App Usability in Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes: Crossover Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Fu Helen Nc, Adam Terrence J, Konstan Joseph A, Wolfson Julian A, Clancy Thomas R, Wyman Jean F

机构信息

Center for Aging Science and Care Innovation, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Department of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, MInneapolis, MN, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Apr 30;4(2):e11462. doi: 10.2196/11462.

DOI:10.2196/11462
PMID:31038468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6660121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than 1100 diabetes mobile apps are available, but app usage by patients is low. App usability may be influenced by patient factors such as age, sex, and psychological needs.

OBJECTIVE

Guided by Self-Determination Theory, the purposes of this study were to (1) assess the effect of patient characteristics on app usability, and (2) determine whether patient characteristics and psychological needs (competence, autonomy, and connectivity)-important for motivation in diabetes care-are associated with app usability.

METHODS

Using a crossover randomized design, 92 adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes tested two Android apps (mySugr and OnTrack) for seven tasks including data entry, blood glucose (BG) reporting, and data sharing. We used multivariable linear regression models to examine associations between patient characteristics, psychological needs, user satisfaction, and user performance (task time, success, and accuracy).

RESULTS

Participants had a mean age of 54 (range 19-74) years, and were predominantly white (62%, 57/92), female (59%, 54/92), with type 2 diabetes (70%, 64/92), and had education beyond high school (67%, 61/92). Participants rated an overall user satisfaction score of 62 (SD 18), which is considered marginally acceptable. The satisfaction mean score for each app was 55 (SD 18) for mySugr and 68 (SD 15) for OnTrack. The mean task completion time for all seven tasks was 7 minutes, with a mean task success of 82% and an accuracy rate of 68%. Higher user satisfaction was observed for patients with less education (P=.04) and those reporting more competence (P=.02), autonomy (P=.006), or connectivity with a health care provider (P=.03). User performance was associated with age, sex, education, diabetes duration, and autonomy. Older patients required more time (95% CI 1.1-3.2) and had less successful task completion (95% CI 3.5-14.3%). Men needed more time (P=.01) and more technical support than women (P=.04). High school education or less was associated with lower task success (P=.003). Diabetes duration of ≥10 years was associated with lower task accuracy (P=.02). Patients who desired greater autonomy and were interested in learning their patterns of BG and carbohydrates had greater task success (P=.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes app usability was associated with psychological needs that are important for motivation. To enhance patient motivation to use diabetes apps for self-management, clinicians should address competence, autonomy, and connectivity by teaching BG pattern recognition and lifestyle planning, customizing BG targets, and reviewing home-monitored data via email. App usability could be improved for older male users and those with less education and greater diabetes duration by tailoring app training and providing ongoing technical support.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e11/6660121/d237f5612281/diabetes_v4i2e11462_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e11/6660121/d237f5612281/diabetes_v4i2e11462_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e11/6660121/d237f5612281/diabetes_v4i2e11462_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

市面上有超过1100款糖尿病移动应用程序,但患者对应用程序的使用率较低。应用程序的可用性可能会受到患者年龄、性别和心理需求等因素的影响。

目的

以自我决定理论为指导,本研究的目的是:(1)评估患者特征对应用程序可用性的影响;(2)确定对糖尿病护理动机至关重要的患者特征和心理需求(能力、自主性和联系性)是否与应用程序可用性相关。

方法

采用交叉随机设计,92名1型或2型糖尿病成年人对两款安卓应用程序(mySugr和OnTrack)进行了七项任务的测试,包括数据录入、血糖(BG)报告和数据共享。我们使用多变量线性回归模型来检验患者特征、心理需求、用户满意度和用户表现(任务时间、成功率和准确性)之间的关联。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为54岁(范围19 - 74岁),主要为白人(62%,57/92),女性(59%,54/92),患有2型糖尿病(70%,64/92),且高中以上学历(67%,61/92)。参与者对用户满意度的总体评分平均为62分(标准差18),这被认为勉强可以接受。mySugr应用程序的满意度平均得分为55分(标准差18),OnTrack应用程序为68分(标准差15)。所有七项任务的平均完成时间为7分钟,平均任务成功率为82%,准确率为68%。受教育程度较低的患者(P = 0.04)以及报告能力更强(P = 0.02)、自主性更强(P = 0.006)或与医疗保健提供者联系更多(P = 0.03)的患者,其用户满意度更高。用户表现与年龄、性别、教育程度、糖尿病病程和自主性相关。老年患者需要更多时间(95%置信区间1.1 - 3.2),任务完成成功率较低(95%置信区间3.5 - 14.3%)。男性比女性需要更多时间(P = 0.01)和更多技术支持(P = 0.04)。高中及以下学历与较低的任务成功率相关(P = 0.003)。糖尿病病程≥10年与较低的任务准确率相关(P = 0.02)。渴望更大自主性且对了解自己的血糖和碳水化合物模式感兴趣有患者,其任务成功率更高(P = 0.049)。

结论

糖尿病应用程序的可用性与对动机至关重要的心理需求相关。为提高患者使用糖尿病应用程序进行自我管理的动机,临床医生应通过教授血糖模式识别和生活方式规划、定制血糖目标以及通过电子邮件审查家庭监测数据来解决能力、自主性和联系性问题。通过定制应用程序培训并提供持续的技术支持,可以提高老年男性用户以及教育程度较低、糖尿病病程较长用户的应用程序可用性。

相似文献

1
Influence of Patient Characteristics and Psychological Needs on Diabetes Mobile App Usability in Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes: Crossover Randomized Trial.患者特征和心理需求对1型或2型糖尿病成人患者糖尿病移动应用可用性的影响:交叉随机试验
JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Apr 30;4(2):e11462. doi: 10.2196/11462.
2
App Design Features Important for Diabetes Self-management as Determined by the Self-Determination Theory on Motivation: Content Analysis of Survey Responses From Adults Requiring Insulin Therapy.基于自我决定动机理论确定的对糖尿病自我管理重要的应用程序设计特征:对需要胰岛素治疗的成年人调查回复的内容分析
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Feb 24;8:e38592. doi: 10.2196/38592.
3
Usability Evaluation of Four Top-Rated Commercially Available Diabetes Apps for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.四款顶级商用2型糖尿病成人应用程序的可用性评估
Comput Inform Nurs. 2020 Jun;38(6):274-280. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000596.
4
Designing and Developing a Mobile App for Management and Treatment of Gestational Diabetes in Nepal: User-Centered Design Study.为尼泊尔妊娠期糖尿病管理与治疗设计和开发一款移动应用程序:以用户为中心的设计研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 17;8:e50823. doi: 10.2196/50823.
5
Comparing Two Commercially Available Diabetes Apps to Explore Challenges in User Engagement: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study.比较两款商用糖尿病应用程序以探索用户参与度方面的挑战:随机对照可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 16;5(6):e25151. doi: 10.2196/25151.
6
Associations Between Psychosocial Needs, Carbohydrate-Counting Behavior, and App Satisfaction: A Randomized Crossover App Trial on 92 Adults With Diabetes.心理社会需求、碳水化合物计数行为与应用程序满意度之间的关联:一项针对 92 名糖尿病成人的随机交叉应用程序试验。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1026-1036. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001073.
7
Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older.适用于糖尿病患者的移动应用程序:一项系统评价及基于专家的可用性评估,该评估考虑了50岁及以上糖尿病患者的特殊需求。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 9;16(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2968.
8
Mobile-Based and Cloud-Based System for Self-management of People With Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Usability Evaluation.基于移动设备和云的 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理系统:开发和可用性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e18167. doi: 10.2196/18167.
9
Design, Development, and Evaluation of an mHealth App for Reporting of Side Effects During Cytostatic Treatment: Usability Test and Interview Study.用于报告细胞毒性治疗期间副作用的移动健康应用程序的设计、开发与评估:可用性测试和访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 19;7:e47374. doi: 10.2196/47374.
10
User-Dependent Usability and Feasibility of a Swallowing Training mHealth App for Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.用户依赖性与吞咽训练移动健康应用于老年人的可行性:混合方法初步研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):e19585. doi: 10.2196/19585.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of StepAdd, a Personalized mHealth Intervention Based on Social Cognitive Theory to Increase Physical Activity Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于社会认知理论的个性化移动健康干预措施StepAdd对2型糖尿病患者增加身体活动的疗效:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 23;13:e53514. doi: 10.2196/53514.
2
Associations Between Psychosocial Needs, Carbohydrate-Counting Behavior, and App Satisfaction: A Randomized Crossover App Trial on 92 Adults With Diabetes.心理社会需求、碳水化合物计数行为与应用程序满意度之间的关联:一项针对 92 名糖尿病成人的随机交叉应用程序试验。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1026-1036. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001073.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Youth With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.1型和2型糖尿病青年患者糖尿病周围神经病变的患病率及危险因素:青少年糖尿病研究(SEARCH)
Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1226-1232. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0179. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
2
Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients.面向不同患者的市售移动应用程序的可用性
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1417-1426. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Health Mobile Apps for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Living in Rural Communities.
Concept of older person autonomy: phenomenological study of the opinion of specialist nurses.
老年人自主性概念:专科护士观点的现象学研究
Porto Biomed J. 2022 Dec 1;7(6):e178. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000178. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
4
App Design Features Important for Diabetes Self-management as Determined by the Self-Determination Theory on Motivation: Content Analysis of Survey Responses From Adults Requiring Insulin Therapy.基于自我决定动机理论确定的对糖尿病自我管理重要的应用程序设计特征:对需要胰岛素治疗的成年人调查回复的内容分析
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Feb 24;8:e38592. doi: 10.2196/38592.
5
From the challenge of assessing autonomy to the instruments used in practice: A scoping review.从评估自主性的挑战到实践中使用的工具:一项范围综述。
Porto Biomed J. 2022 Sep 9;7(4):e153. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000153. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
6
A Web-Based Health Application to Translate Nutrition Therapy for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Primary Care (PortfolioDiet.app): Quality Improvement and Usability Testing Study.一种用于在初级保健中翻译降低心血管风险营养疗法的基于网络的健康应用程序(PortfolioDiet.app):质量改进与可用性测试研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 21;9(2):e34704. doi: 10.2196/34704.
7
The My Diabetes Care Patient Portal Intervention: Usability and Pre-Post Assessment.《我的糖尿病护理患者门户干预:可用性和预-后评估》。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):539-550. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730324. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
Feeling better on hemodialysis: user-centered design requirements for promoting patient involvement in the prevention of treatment complications.血液透析中的舒适感:以用户为中心的设计要求,以促进患者参与预防治疗并发症。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 30;28(8):1612-1631. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab033.
9
Content Analysis: First-Time Patient User Challenges with Top-Rated Commercial Diabetes Apps.内容分析:最受欢迎的商业糖尿病应用程序中首次患者用户面临的挑战。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Jun;27(6):663-669. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0128. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Current Developments in Digital Quantitative Volume Estimation for the Optimisation of Dietary Assessment.数字定量容积估计在膳食评估优化中的最新进展。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 22;12(4):1167. doi: 10.3390/nu12041167.
探索健康移动应用给生活在农村社区的2型糖尿病患者带来的挑战与机遇。
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Sep;22(9):733-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0180. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
The Motivating Function of Healthcare Professional in eHealth and mHealth Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Patients and the Mediating Role of Patient Engagement.医疗保健专业人员在2型糖尿病患者电子健康和移动健康干预中的激励作用以及患者参与的中介作用。
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2974521. doi: 10.1155/2016/2974521. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
5
Pattern of active and inactive sequences of diabetes self-monitoring in mobile phone and paper diary users.手机和纸质日记使用者的糖尿病自我监测活动与非活动序列模式。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:7630-3. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320159.
6
10. Older Adults.10. 老年人。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S81-5. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S013.
7
Introduction.引言。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S1-2. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S001.
8
mHealth applications for diabetes: User preference and implications for app development.糖尿病的移动健康应用:用户偏好及对应用开发的启示
Health Informatics J. 2016 Dec;22(4):1111-1120. doi: 10.1177/1460458215616265. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
9
Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics.量化可用性:对一个糖尿病移动健康系统在有效性、效率和满意度指标以及相关用户特征方面的评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):5-11. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv099. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Trends in health care expenditure in U.S. adults with diabetes: 2002-2011.2002 - 2011年美国成年糖尿病患者的医疗保健支出趋势
Diabetes Care. 2015 Oct;38(10):1844-51. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0369. Epub 2015 Jul 22.