Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated With The Hebrew University Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated With The Hebrew University Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.032. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
Adherent and invasive placenta, termed Placenta Creta Spectrum (PCS), is associated with increased maternal morbidity and mortality. Incidence and risk factors for Placenta Creta are on the rise and call to optimize the obstetric care for this condition.
We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between a ProActive Peripartum Multidisciplinary Approach (PAMA) as compared to the urgent management of the Placenta Creta Spectrum patients.
We conducted a single-center prospective observational study between 2005-2016. PCS patients registered with the implementation of a PAMA protocol 2014-2016 epoch(E2) were compared with the pre-PAMA 2005-2013 epoch(E1), managed by urgent team recruitment. The PAMA protocol is grounded on a continuum of care; A. Antenatal: PCS risk assessment based on clinical history and imaging, surgical, anesthesia, urological consults and designation of a dedicated team to be present at planned surgery; B. Delivery: planned at 34-35 weeks, massive transfusion protocol activation, insertion of ureteral catheters, vertical uterine incision, placement of vessel loops on the iliac vessels, avoidance of active placenta delivery, followed by the decision of hysterectomy or uterine repair; C. Post-operative care: intensive care admission. We evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes.
During the study period 158,438 deliveries were registered in our institution; we identified a total of 72 PCS cases (0.05%): 50(69.4%) in E1 and 22 (30.6%) in E2. Patient characteristics were comparable among epochs. Significantly, patients in E2 vs. E1 had fewer events of massive blood transfusion 36.0% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.05; were transfused less RBC units: median 4 vs. 1.5, p = 0.012, had no transfusion-related respiratory complications and hemorrhage control re-laparotomies. Hysterectomy and hollow visceral injury rates were comparable (72% vs. 63.7%, 26% vs. 22%; respectively). The hysterectomy pathology assessment was available for the majority of the cases in both epochs; percreta diagnosis rate significantly increased in E2. The neonatal outcome was similar among the epochs.
Institution of a PAMA protocol for PCS resulted in eliminating the urgent deliveries and in reducing the associated significant hemorrhagic related maternal morbidity, with no increase in the rate of hysterectomy or adverse neonatal outcome.
粘连性和侵入性胎盘,称为胎盘 Creta 谱(PCS),与产妇发病率和死亡率增加有关。胎盘 Creta 的发病率和危险因素呈上升趋势,因此需要优化这种病症的产科护理。
我们旨在比较 ProActive 围产期多学科方法(PAMA)与胎盘 Creta 谱患者紧急管理之间的产妇和新生儿结局。
我们进行了一项 2005-2016 年期间的单中心前瞻性观察性研究。2014-2016 年实施 PAMA 方案时登记的 PCS 患者(E2)与 2005-2013 年的前 PAMA 时期(E1)进行比较,E1 时期通过紧急团队招聘进行管理。PAMA 方案基于连续护理原则:A. 产前:根据临床病史和影像学检查、手术、麻醉、泌尿科咨询进行 PCS 风险评估,并指定专门的团队在计划手术时到场;B. 分娩:计划在 34-35 周进行,启动大量输血方案,插入输尿管导管,垂直子宫切口,在髂血管上放置血管环,避免主动胎盘分娩,然后决定进行子宫切除术或子宫修复;C. 术后护理:入住重症监护病房。我们评估了产妇和新生儿结局。
在研究期间,我们机构共登记了 158438 例分娩;我们共发现了 72 例 PCS 病例(0.05%):E1 中有 50 例(69.4%),E2 中有 22 例(30.6%)。两个时期的患者特征无明显差异。值得注意的是,E2 组与 E1 组相比,大量输血事件明显减少(36.0%比 13.6%,p=0.05);E2 组输注的 RBC 单位也较少:中位数 4 比 1.5,p=0.012;E2 组没有输血相关的呼吸并发症和出血控制再剖腹手术。子宫切除术和空心内脏损伤率在两组之间相似(72%比 63.7%,26%比 22%)。E2 组的子宫切除术病理评估结果可用于大多数病例。E2 组的 percreta 诊断率显著增加。两个时期的新生儿结局相似。
实施 PCS 的 PAMA 方案可消除紧急分娩,并减少相关显著出血相关的产妇发病率,而不会增加子宫切除术或不良新生儿结局的发生率。