Suppr超能文献

用镥177-前列腺特异性膜抗原进行全身放疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的反应评估:实体瘤反应评估标准、实体瘤正电子发射断层扫描反应标准、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织以及通过镓68-前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描评估的MDA标准之间的比较。

Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography.

作者信息

Gupta Manoj, Choudhury Partha Sarathi, Rawal Sudhir, Goel Harish Chandra, Rao Shriram Avinash

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India.

Department of Uro-Gynae Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2019 Apr-Jun;11(2):155-162. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_111_18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated various morphological and molecular response criteria in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) patient undergoing peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) with Lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) by using Gallium 68-PSMA positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (Ga68-PSMA PET-CT).

METHODS

A total of 46 pre- and 8-12 weeks' post-PRLT Ga68-PSMA PET-CT studies were reanalyzed (23 comparisons). Prostate-specific antigen drop of ≥50% and ≥25% increase was considered as partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD), respectively, for biochemical response (BR) while change in-between was considered as stable disease (SD). Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and MD Anderson (MDA) criteria for morphological response while PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0 (PERCIST 1.0) and European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) criteria for molecular response were used. Kappa coefficient was derived to see the level of agreement.

RESULTS

The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by BR and RECIST criteria was 9 (39.13%), 3 (13.04%), and 11 (47.83%) and 5 (21.74%), 2 (8.70%), and 16 (69.57%), respectively. The proportion of PD, PR, and SD was same by PERCIST and EORTC criteria and which were 8 (34.78%), 5 (21.74%), and 10 (43.48%). The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by MDA criteria was 1 (4.35%), 1 (4.35%), and 21 (91.30%), respectively. Poor agreement between BR and both morphological criteria while a statistically significant agreement with both molecular criteria seen.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that molecular criteria performed better than morphological criteria in response assessment by Ga68-PSMA PET-CT in metastatic castration resistant PCa patients undergoing PRLT.

摘要

引言

我们通过使用镓68 - 前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描 - 计算机断层扫描(Ga68 - PSMA PET - CT),评估了接受镥177 - PSMA肽受体放射性配体疗法(PRLT)的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(PCa)患者的各种形态学和分子反应标准。

方法

对46例PRLT前和PRLT后8 - 12周的Ga68 - PSMA PET - CT研究进行重新分析(23次比较)。前列腺特异性抗原下降≥50%和升高≥25%分别被视为生化反应(BR)的部分缓解(PR)和疾病进展(PD),而介于两者之间的变化被视为疾病稳定(SD)。使用实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1(RECIST 1.1)和MD安德森(MDA)标准评估形态学反应,同时使用实体瘤PET反应标准1.0(PERCIST 1.0)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)标准评估分子反应。计算kappa系数以查看一致性水平。

结果

根据BR和RECIST标准,PD、PR和SD的比例分别为9例(39.13%)、3例(13.04%)和11例(47.83%),以及5例(21.74%)、2例(8.70%)和16例(69.57%)。根据PERCIST和EORTC标准,PD、PR和SD的比例相同,分别为8例(34.78%)、5例(21.74%)和10例(43.48%)。根据MDA标准,PD、PR和SD的比例分别为1例(4.35%)、1例(4.35%)和21例(91.30%)。BR与两种形态学标准之间的一致性较差,而与两种分子标准之间存在统计学上的显著一致性。

结论

我们得出结论,在接受PRLT的转移性去势抵抗性PCa患者中,通过Ga68 - PSMA PET - CT进行反应评估时,分子标准比形态学标准表现更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验