• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被忽视的领导潜力:男性与女性求职者在领导潜力方面的偏好。

Overlooked Leadership Potential: The Preference for Leadership Potential in Job Candidates Who Are Men vs. Women.

作者信息

Player Abigail, Randsley de Moura Georgina, Leite Ana C, Abrams Dominic, Tresh Fatima

机构信息

Centre for the Study of Group Processes, School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00755. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00755
PMID:31040804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6476968/
Abstract

Two experiments tested the value people attach to the leadership potential and leadership performance of female and male candidates for leadership positions in an organizational hiring simulation. In both experiments, participants ( = 297) valued leadership potential more highly than leadership performance, but only for male candidates. By contrast, female candidates were preferred when they demonstrated leadership performance over leadership potential. The findings reveal an that exclusively benefits men and hinders women who pursue leadership positions that require leadership potential. Implications for the representation of women in leadership positions and directions for future research are discussed.

摘要

两项实验在一个组织招聘模拟中测试了人们对担任领导职位的女性和男性候选人的领导潜力和领导表现所赋予的价值。在这两项实验中,参与者(N = 297)更看重领导潜力而非领导表现,但仅针对男性候选人而言。相比之下,当女性候选人展现出领导表现而非领导潜力时,她们更受青睐。研究结果揭示了一种仅对男性有利而阻碍追求需要领导潜力的领导职位的女性的现象。文中讨论了这些发现对女性担任领导职位的影响以及未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
Overlooked Leadership Potential: The Preference for Leadership Potential in Job Candidates Who Are Men vs. Women.被忽视的领导潜力:男性与女性求职者在领导潜力方面的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00755. eCollection 2019.
2
Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language.聘请女性进入高级领导职位与减少组织语言中的性别刻板印象有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026443119.
3
Reducing gender bias in the evaluation and selection of future leaders: The role of decision-makers' mindsets about the universality of leadership potential.减少未来领导者评估和选拔中的性别偏见:决策者关于领导力潜力普遍性的思维模式的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Dec;108(12):1924-1951. doi: 10.1037/apl0001112. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Endorsing and Reinforcing Gender and Age Stereotypes: The Negative Effect on Self-Rated Leadership Potential for Women and Older Workers.认可并强化性别和年龄刻板印象:对女性和年长员工自我评定的领导潜力的负面影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 18;10:688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00688. eCollection 2019.
5
Gender Diversity in General Surgery Residency Leadership.普通外科住院医师领导力中的性别多样性。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):e68-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
6
Through a Gender Lens: A View of Gender and Leadership Positions in a Department of Medicine.透过性别视角:对医学系中性别与领导职位的审视
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;24(10):837-42. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5054. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
7
Survey of health-system pharmacy leadership pathways.卫生系统药学领导途径调查。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 May 15;66(10):947-52. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080186.
8
National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track.全国性招聘实验表明,在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)终身教职岗位上,教员对女性的偏好比例为2比1。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 28;112(17):5360-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418878112. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
9
Policy and organizational implications of gender imbalance in the NHS.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中性别失衡的政策与组织影响
J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(4-5):432-47. doi: 10.1108/14777260710778952.
10
Influences for Gender Disparity in the Radiology Societies in North America.北美放射学会中的性别差异影响因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):831-838. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19741. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The phenotype of academic pathology chairs.学术病理学系主任的表型。
Acad Pathol. 2023 Feb 1;10(1):100061. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100061. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Gender stereotypes in leadership: Analyzing the content and evaluation of stereotypes about typical, male, and female leaders.领导力中的性别刻板印象:分析关于典型领导者、男性领导者和女性领导者的刻板印象的内容与评价。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 27;14:1034258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1034258. eCollection 2023.
3
Paternalistic Leadership and Job Embeddedness With Relation to Innovative Work Behaviors and Employee Job Performance: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism.家长式领导与工作嵌入性对创新工作行为和员工工作绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:759088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.759088. eCollection 2022.
4
Gender Disparity in Evaluation of Internal Medicine Clerkship Performance.内科实习表现评估中的性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115661. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15661.
5
The preference for potential in competence, not in morality: Asymmetric biases regarding a group's potential for moral improvement and decline.偏好能力而非道德:关于群体道德改善和堕落潜力的不对称偏见。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 4;15(8):e0236748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236748. eCollection 2020.
6
Endorsing and Reinforcing Gender and Age Stereotypes: The Negative Effect on Self-Rated Leadership Potential for Women and Older Workers.认可并强化性别和年龄刻板印象:对女性和年长员工自我评定的领导潜力的负面影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 18;10:688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00688. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women's implicit and explicit dominance behavior.微妙的反弹性暂停:对女性内隐和外显支配行为的惩罚的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Feb;142(2):165-97. doi: 10.1037/bul0000039. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
2
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
3
A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.元分析性别刻板印象和在雇佣决策实验模拟中的偏见。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):128-61. doi: 10.1037/a0036734. Epub 2014 May 26.
4
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators.性别与领导效能感知:情境调节变量的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1129-45. doi: 10.1037/a0036751. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
5
Potential: the valuation of imagined future achievement.潜力:对想象中未来成就的评估。
Cognition. 2014 Jan;130(1):134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
6
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
7
The preference for potential.偏好潜力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):567-83. doi: 10.1037/a0029227. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
8
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.领导者刻板印象是否具有男性气质?三个研究范式的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):616-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023557.
9
Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.自主的女性和共有的领导力:角色期望如何赋予女性高层领导者优势。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):221-35. doi: 10.1037/a0018204.
10
Women and the vision thing.
Harv Bus Rev. 2009 Jan;87(1):62-70, 117.